NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The professional GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. The Max-Q variants are lower clocked versions that are running more efficient and can be used in smaller chassis than the regular versions. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 (mobile) but offers fewer shaders (2,560) and is therefore positioned between the GeForce RTX 2080 (2,944) and 2070 (2,304). Currently we know of three different Max-Q variants with a power consumption (TGP) of 90, 85 and 80 Watt and different clock speeds.
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 2560 110 1350 1770 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 90 960 1485 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 85 900 1440 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 80 780 1380 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
For professional applications, the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q should be only slightly above the mobile Quadro RTX 3000 (depending on the version). Compared to consumer cards, the mobile RTX 2070 will offer a similar performance (or slightly lower).
The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX4000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops although we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 for laptops is a professional high-end graphics card for big and powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU106 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2070 (mobile) but with reduced shaders, clock speeds and memory bandwidth.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Variante Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 1920 80 945 1380 Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 70 870 1380 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 65 765 1305 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 60 600 1215 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 3000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM.
The high power consumption of the RTX3000 makes the card most suited for big and heavy laptops. The slower Max-Q variant is intended for thinner laptops.
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) Quadro Turing Series Codename TU117 N19E-Q3 MAX-Q N19E-Q1 Architecture Turing Turing Turing Pipelines 1024 - unified 2560 - unified 1920 - unified Core Speed 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz Theoretical Performance 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Memory Speed 12000 effective = 1500 MHz 14000 MHz 14000 MHz Memory Bus Width 64 Bit 256 Bit 192 Bit Memory Type GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 8 GB 6 GB Shared Memory no no no Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s API DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) 80 - 90 Watt 80 Watt technology 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm Notebook Size medium sized large large Date of Announcement 27.05.2022 27.05.2019 27.05.2019 Information Optimus only Link to Manufacturer Page nvdam.widen.net Transistors 10.8 Billion 10.8 Billion Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.8 pt (23%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6.8 pt (20%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
6724 Points (19%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 30% 37% 100%
min: 5566 avg: 5856 median: 5923 (17%) max: 6080 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 87% 30% 37% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
6764 Points (18%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 28% 33% 100%
min: 5503 avg: 5702 median: 5589 (15%) max: 6014 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 84% 28% 33% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
140064 Points (18%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 16%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (19%) max: 17829 Points
23809 Points (25%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 74% 100%
min: 32163 avg: 35433 median: 36407 (39%) max: 37729 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 50% 67%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (9%) max: 33694 Points
35167 Points (9%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 94% 100%
min: 62730 avg: 86865 median: 91394 (24%) max: 106470 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 38% 40%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 100%
15010 Points (26%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 30% 35% 100%
min: 12693 avg: 13568 median: 13570 (24%) max: 14442 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 90% 30% 35% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
17049 Points (19%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 28% 33% 100%
min: 13802 avg: 14842 median: 14841.5 (17%) max: 15881 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 87% 28% 33% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
35402 Points (4%)
123598 Points (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 29%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
min: 19079 avg: 19888 median: 19888 (28%) max: 20697 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 36% 43% 92%
min: 15944 avg: 17495 median: 17864 (25%) max: 18307 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 95% 39% 47% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 23464 avg: 23574 median: 23574 (20%) max: 23684 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 99% 31% 37% 100%
min: 17569 avg: 19467 median: 19878.5 (17%) max: 20542 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 86% 31% 37% 100%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
50309 Points (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 50%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
54830 Points (31%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 45%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
37304 Points (49%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 83%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
58.3 fps (19%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
199.4 fps (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 650%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
116 fps (29%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 107 avg: 112.1 median: 110.6 (27%) max: 120.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
128 fps (19%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 112.7 median: 113.5 (17%) max: 124.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
96.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 76.9 avg: 81 median: 82 (18%) max: 83.2 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 72.4 avg: 78.2 median: 73.8 (20%) max: 92.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
131 fps (52%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 113.6 avg: 118.2 median: 119.1 (48%) max: 121 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
122 fps (20%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 108.8 avg: 117.5 median: 115.5 (19%) max: 130 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
175 fps (31%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 151 avg: 157.3 median: 158 (28%) max: 163 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.01 avg: 46 median: 46 (12%) max: 49 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 11.54 avg: 11.8 median: 11.8 (11%) max: 12.13 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 112.1 avg: 121.1 median: 121.1 (32%) max: 130 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 73% 81% 86%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 109.6 avg: 120.2 median: 121.6 (33%) max: 128 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 78% 87% 92%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 225.4 avg: 245.2 median: 245.2 (27%) max: 265 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 37% 41% 85%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 160.6 avg: 204.3 median: 215.5 (24%) max: 225.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 96% 43% 49% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 89.3 avg: 93 median: 93 (20%) max: 96.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 26% 29% 92%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 73.3 avg: 79.3 median: 80.8 (18%) max: 82.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 93% 28% 31% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
81.9 fps (17%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 43% 50% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 53.9 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (12%) max: 65.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 73% 43% 50% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162 avg: 185 median: 185 (21%) max: 208 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 38% 42% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 155.4 avg: 182.3 median: 189.5 (22%) max: 194.7 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 42% 47% 86%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.3 fps (11%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 34% 38% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 25.76 avg: 28.2 median: 28.2 (9%) max: 30.55 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 80% 34% 38% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162.1 avg: 186.1 median: 186.1 (27%) max: 210 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 40% 43% 77%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 160.6 avg: 182.5 median: 186.5 (27%) max: 196.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 45% 48% 86%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 181.6 avg: 204.8 median: 204.8 (23%) max: 228 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 47% 52% 80%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 185.8 avg: 199 median: 202.5 (23%) max: 205.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 52% 58% 89%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 94% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 129.5 avg: 150.8 median: 150.8 (26%) max: 172 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 36% 39% 75%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 149.4 avg: 156.7 median: 157.5 (27%) max: 162.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 39% 42% 81%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
114.4 fps (22%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 44% 54% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
181 fps (30%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 51% 63% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (11%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
38.3 fps (27%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 38% 47% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (14%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
159.9 fps (23%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 58% 69% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (10%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.7 fps (29%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 32% 38% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
88.3 fps (43%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 53% 52% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (16%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
60.5 fps (39%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 39% 49% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (13%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
64.1 fps (29%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 45% 50% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111.4 fps (11%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (9%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (28%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (24%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6821 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.2 fps (45%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 191 avg: 210.5 median: 210.5 (12%) max: 230 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 81% 89% 83%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 192.4 avg: 203.6 median: 204 (12%) max: 214 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 90% 98% 91%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 99.8 median: 99.8 (100%) max: 100 %
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
257.8 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 46%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
384.8 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 45%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
407.8 fps (24%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
1010 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 45%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2754 Samples/s (12%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5769 Samples/s (10%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
8716 Points (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 60%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
149.2 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 121% 100%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
152.8 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 120% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
168.4 Watt (37%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 143% 100%
min: 135.5 avg: 143.8 median: 143 (31%) max: 153 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 109% 143% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (44%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
0.4 fps per Watt (37%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 83%
min: 0.3523 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (39%) max: 0.4354 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 88% 100% 83%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 86%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
48 dB(A) (77%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 82% 89% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 30.7 avg: 38.9 median: 41.2 (66%) max: 44.7 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 81% 82% 89% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 100% n=19 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 236% n=19 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 225% n=19
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
59.9 62 63 ~ 62 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
92 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
84 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
73 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
226.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
107.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
69.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
46 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
91 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
62 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
39 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
135 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
100 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
79 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
47.7 51 56 ~ 52 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
38.7 42 44 ~ 42 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
33.2 36 38 ~ 36 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
75 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
41 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
38 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
35 fps
133%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3 fps
163%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114 fps
125%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8 fps
162%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102 fps
116%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2 fps
151%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3 fps
190%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118 fps
279%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5 fps
310%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
219.1 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
213.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
174.6 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
99.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
83 fps
112%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps
121%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
142 fps
110%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps
124%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
130 fps
113%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps
139%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
132 fps
115%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps
138%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88 fps
173%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221 fps
226%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
274.9 303.2 ~ 289 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
237%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178 fps
257%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
182.7 202.8 ~ 193 fps
100%
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
280%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115 fps
266%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
101.3 117 ~ 109 fps
298%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps
267%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
53.9 59 ~ 56 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 185% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 242%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 183% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 267%
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2019 102 92 84 73 Total War: Three Kingdoms 226.5 107.7 69.2 46 Far Cry New Dawn 114 91 86 77 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 96 77 62 39 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135 100 88 79 X-Plane 11.11 114 102 86 Rocket League 219.1 Rise of the Tomb Raider 213.9 174.6 99.4 83 Dota 2 Reborn 142 130 132 121 88 The Witcher 3 289 193 109 56 BioShock Infinite 338 291 271 144 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 6 6 4 8 3 3 4 2 1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K X-Plane 11.11 93.3 78.8 66.2 45.3 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 118 86.5 68.3 46.3 29.7 Dota 2 Reborn 131 116 107 101 65 The Witcher 3 221 178 115 62.6 36 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 16. 19:36:42
#0 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9854 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0.036s ... 0.17s
#9 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.015s ... 0.185s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.016s ... 0.2s
#11 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.008s ... 0.208s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9854 +0.013s ... 0.221s
#13 got single benchmarks 9854 +0.019s ... 0.24s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.24s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.421s ... 0.661s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.661s
#17 Got 162 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.687s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.687s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.7s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.037s ... 0.736s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.736s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.738s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)