Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945H
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.6     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
103.3 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1060     median: 1135 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
960 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 17423     avg: 17604     median: 17604 (16%)     max: 17785 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 1812     avg: 1813     median: 1813 (76%)     max: 1814 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 638     avg: 654     median: 654 (71%)     max: 670 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 6859     avg: 6908     median: 6907.5 (17%)     max: 6956 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 2605     avg: 2734     median: 2777 (18%)     max: 2819 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 283     avg: 283.5     median: 283.5 (79%)     max: 284 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
64 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
7339 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
min: 72851     avg: 73037     median: 73036.5 (42%)     max: 73222 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 6615     avg: 6640     median: 6639.5 (78%)     max: 6664 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
158.9 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
284.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 21.9     avg: 22.2     median: 22.2 (39%)     max: 22.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
15.7 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 286     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (4%)     max: 293 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.5     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 180     median: 180 (1%)     max: 182 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.4298     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4346 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
15945 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
621 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20239     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
min: 20449     avg: 22111     median: 22111 (54%)     max: 23773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29844     median: 30184.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 27032     avg: 27721     median: 27721 (49%)     max: 28410 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10400     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 11800     avg: 11812     median: 11811.5 (50%)     max: 11823 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2692     avg: 2702     median: 2701.5 (67%)     max: 2711 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
min: 12638     avg: 12650     median: 12650 (49%)     max: 12662 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
min: 1991     avg: 1993     median: 1993 (78%)     max: 1995 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
min: 11949     avg: 11989     median: 11988.5 (21%)     max: 12028 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
1927 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
11903 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
505 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (79%)     max: 124105 Points
96399 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
263 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
308 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
1800 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
107.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
19.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
11.7 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945H → 95% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 23. 16:19:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755958760s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.031s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 17942 +0.005s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.118s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)