Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.

As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.

The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.

Performance

We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

The Ryzen 9 9950X is a very, very powerful desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 16 Zen 5 cores (32 threads), PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start in August.

The 9950X shares some of the specifications with the mighty Zen 4-powered Ryzen 9 7950X, including (but not limited to) the 16 MB L2 cache, the 64 MB L3 cache, the 5.7 GHz top clock speed and the 170 W long-term TDP.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9950X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9950X has an impressive 64 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5,600 MT/s (up to 8,000 MT/s if overclocked).

The 9950X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

According to early July leaks, its multi-thread performance is about as good as that of the 24-core Core i9-14900K Intel CPU. We'll definitely update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9950X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with TSMC's N4P process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 9's long-term TDP is 170 W. It'll probably consume up to 250 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DAMD Ryzen 7 8745HSAMD Ryzen 9 9950X
CodenameGranite RidgeHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Granite Ridge
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)
Series: Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Granite Ridge
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X « 4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4700 - 5200 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz4300 - 5700 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB16 MB
L3 Cache96 MB16 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP120 Watt35 Watt170 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm & 6 nm
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)FP7r2/FP8AM5
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$479 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8745HS
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 9 9950X
51.5 pt (86%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
132 Points (74%)
min: 96     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 101 Points
136 Points (76%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1358 Points (25%)
min: 696     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 869 Points
2254 Points (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23230 Points (22%)
min: 13928     avg: 15082     median: 15082 (14%)     max: 16236 Points
40924 Points (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2080 Points (88%)
min: 1598     avg: 1650     median: 1649.5 (69%)     max: 1701 Points
2202 Points (93%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
818 Points (89%)
min: 623     avg: 641     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 658 Points
871 Points (95%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9057 Points (22%)
min: 5546     avg: 5949     median: 5948.5 (15%)     max: 6351 Points
15788 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3647 Points (23%)
min: 2120     avg: 2349     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2578 Points
6335 Points (40%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
328 Points (91%)
min: 254     avg: 258.5     median: 258.5 (72%)     max: 263 Points
344 Points (95%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.7 Points (54%)
min: 26.63     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 30.54 Points
72.3 Points (94%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
min: 3.01     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.18 Points
min: 4.03     avg: 4     median: 4 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8933 Points (54%)
min: 6919     avg: 7109     median: 7109 (43%)     max: 7299 Points
9402 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60825 Points (44%)
min: 42597     avg: 44583     median: 44583 (32%)     max: 46569 Points
71611 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
119288 Points (76%)
min: 73346     avg: 80094     median: 80094 (51%)     max: 86842 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16618 Points (20%)
min: 13252     avg: 13560     median: 13559.5 (17%)     max: 13867 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
54.3 s (1%)
min: 70.237     avg: 78.5     median: 78.5 (1%)     max: 86.762 s
29.3 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
min: 2.895     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.168 s
2.1 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15574 Points (25%)
min: 6655     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (11%)     max: 6832 Points
13778 Points (22%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90226     avg: 90604     median: 90354 (52%)     max: 91233 MIPS
min: 61021     avg: 62467     median: 62466.5 (36%)     max: 63912 MIPS
160423 MIPS (92%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 8346     avg: 8407     median: 8392 (99%)     max: 8484 MIPS
min: 6058     avg: 6196     median: 6196 (73%)     max: 6334 MIPS
7852 MIPS (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
203 fps (68%)
min: 116.3     avg: 132     median: 132 (44%)     max: 147.6 fps
271 fps (91%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
375.5 fps (87%)
min: 253.5     avg: 259.5     median: 259.5 (60%)     max: 265.5 fps
392 fps (90%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.6 fps (54%)
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
45.1 fps (79%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (37%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
3.4 GB/s (100%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
5.6 GB/s (97%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.8 GB/s (46%)
min: 11     avg: 12     median: 12 (31%)     max: 12.9 GB/s
32.4 GB/s (84%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
204 Seconds (3%)
min: 308     avg: 360     median: 360 (5%)     max: 412 Seconds
118 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
137 Seconds (1%)
min: 197     avg: 223     median: 223 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
77 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
min: 0.4716     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4824 sec
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17855     avg: 18319     median: 18341.5 (39%)     max: 18804 Points
min: 12566     avg: 13889     median: 14260 (30%)     max: 14842 Points
21838 Points (46%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
min: 7.327     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.767 s
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
min: 18.261     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (1%)     max: 19.501 s
15.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
724 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108581     median: 108660 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
min: 60822     avg: 75015     median: 81786 (63%)     max: 82438 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 34973     avg: 38174     median: 38568 (95%)     max: 40357 Points
min: 18094     avg: 18883     median: 18786 (46%)     max: 19770 Points
38269 Points (94%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105635     median: 105729 (86%)     max: 107334 Points
min: 75153     avg: 80190     median: 80377 (65%)     max: 85041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105578     median: 105670 (86%)     max: 107578 Points
min: 74475     avg: 79731     median: 80119 (65%)     max: 84598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 109007     median: 108655 (87%)     max: 112948 Points
min: 82213     avg: 83020     median: 83423 (67%)     max: 83423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29255     median: 29271.5 (74%)     max: 29952 Points
min: 17585     avg: 19129     median: 19399 (49%)     max: 20403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 38742     avg: 39187     median: 39248 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
min: 22958     avg: 25619     median: 25815 (46%)     max: 28084 Points
49522 Points (88%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14848     avg: 15759     median: 15803 (67%)     max: 16218 Points
min: 8644     avg: 9841     median: 9408 (40%)     max: 11471 Points
16112 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3213     avg: 3278     median: 3285 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
min: 2439     avg: 2504     median: 2522 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
3408 Points (85%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 17704     avg: 18164     median: 18202 (71%)     max: 18579 Points
min: 9801     avg: 10477     median: 9956 (39%)     max: 11675 Points
21383 Points (83%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2382     avg: 2425     median: 2428.5 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
min: 1802     avg: 1847     median: 1865 (73%)     max: 1875 Points
2559 Points (100%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15973     avg: 16469     median: 16531 (30%)     max: 16726 Points
min: 9645     avg: 10037     median: 9864 (18%)     max: 10601 Points
23982 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2176     avg: 2275     median: 2282 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1769     median: 1761 (8%)     max: 1813 Points
2445 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15903     avg: 16448     median: 16524.5 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
min: 9697     avg: 10014     median: 9815 (31%)     max: 10531 Points
23387 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9107     avg: 9442     median: 9444 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
min: 7336     avg: 7475     median: 7430 (74%)     max: 7659 Points
10016 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 64532     avg: 68545     median: 68717 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
min: 40481     avg: 41166     median: 40493 (40%)     max: 42524 Points
100326 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
401 ms (0%)
min: 537     avg: 563     median: 563 (1%)     max: 589 ms
377 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
337 Points (93%)
min: 233     avg: 242     median: 242 (66%)     max: 251 Points
357 Points (98%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
min: 282     avg: 286     median: 286 (51%)     max: 290 Points
409 Points (73%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
min: 1599     avg: 1619     median: 1618.5 (61%)     max: 1638 Points
2451 Points (92%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
272 Watt (47%)
min: 50.9     avg: 71.7     median: 71.7 (12%)     max: 92.5 Watt
319 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
238 Watt (43%)
min: 50.5     avg: 76     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101.4 Watt
313 Watt (57%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 87.4     avg: 105.4     median: 104.1 (69%)     max: 137.9 Watt
1309%
1 R7 8745HS +
min: 7.44     avg: 8     median: 8 (5%)     max: 8.46 Watt
100 Watt (66%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 25.4     avg: 33.7     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 42 Points per Watt
20.2 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS → 70% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9950X → 131% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 24. 12:50:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17637 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756032628s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.01s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.059s ... 0.087s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.006s ... 0.093s

#11 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.008s ... 0.102s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17637 +0.006s ... 0.107s

#13 got single benchmarks 17637 +0.006s ... 0.113s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.145s ... 0.258s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.258s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)