Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Krackan Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT866 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
min: 113.5     avg: 115.7     median: 115.2 (65%)     max: 119 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 720     avg: 893     median: 905 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 12647     avg: 15682     median: 15971.5 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1916     avg: 1958     median: 1953.5 (82%)     max: 2006 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 768.5 (84%)     max: 784 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 4897     avg: 6107     median: 6245.5 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2452     median: 2477 (16%)     max: 2734 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 204     avg: 277.1     median: 294 (81%)     max: 305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 48124     avg: 56861     median: 58647 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 5544     avg: 6017     median: 6045.5 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (4%)     max: 149.8 fps
155.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (7%)     max: 289 fps
319 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 16.2     avg: 20.2     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 335     median: 322 (4%)     max: 427 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 223.7     median: 200 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
8.7 s (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 13154     avg: 19179     median: 19672 (48%)     max: 21820 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (69%)     max: 93052 Points
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 16181     avg: 18316     median: 18475.5 (47%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 21629     avg: 27408     median: 28243 (50%)     max: 30008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 8566     avg: 10023     median: 10182 (43%)     max: 11005 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (64%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2783     median: 2854 (69%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 10774     avg: 13005     median: 13350 (52%)     max: 14194 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2523     avg: 2562     median: 2577 (82%)     max: 2587 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12556     avg: 12666     median: 12719 (52%)     max: 12722 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (74%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 805     avg: 1888     median: 2065.5 (78%)     max: 2155 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 6705     avg: 11120     median: 11341.5 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 431     avg: 485.2     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 693 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (66%)     max: 96330 Points
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (84%)     max: 119825 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 193.1     avg: 251.1     median: 261 (72%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 256     avg: 301.7     median: 314 (56%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1452     avg: 1759     median: 1757 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 39.8     avg: 75.3     median: 68.1 (12%)     max: 106.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 39.2     avg: 75.6     median: 67.5 (12%)     max: 115.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 3.7     avg: 11.4     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 5.05     avg: 7.2     median: 6.8 (8%)     max: 12.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt
min: 21     avg: 34.2     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 49.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 237% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 14. 04:04:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760407480s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.021s ... 0.03s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.018s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.121s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)