NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIA Quadro M620 ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 ► remove from comparison
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.
The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.
The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.
The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.
The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used for 15-Watt processor and therefore small-sized notebooks.
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 Gen. 9.5 Series Architecture Maxwell Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Pipelines 512 - unified 48 - unified Core Speed 1018 MHz 300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 5012 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 DDR3, DDR4 Max. Amount of Memory 2048 MB Shared Memory no yes API DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 30 Watt technology 28 nm 14 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus QuickSync Notebook Size large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 10.07.2019 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de Codename Kaby Lake GT3e
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Core i7-8557U 4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W 300 MHz 1150 MHz Intel Core i5-8257U 4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W 300 MHz 1050 MHz min. - max. 300 MHz 1050 - 1150 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
1.4 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (3%)
624 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (2%)
550 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481 avg: 13620 median: 13620 (15%) max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980 avg: 22120 median: 22119.5 (6%) max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694 avg: 2914 median: 2989 (5%) max: 3059 Points
1736 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867 avg: 3067 median: 3130 (4%) max: 3204 Points
1893 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4015 avg: 4118 median: 4140 (6%) max: 4200 Points
3238 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3676 avg: 3761 median: 3801 (3%) max: 3805 Points
2985 Points (3%)
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
17237 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
15307 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (32%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6 avg: 16.5 median: 16.5 (5%) max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
37.9 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
40.4 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
50.1 fps (38%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
20.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
54.8 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
51.5 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 55.3 avg: 57.6 median: 56.3 (14%) max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 25.96 avg: 27.5 median: 27.8 (4%) max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15.8 avg: 18.8 median: 20.2 (4%) max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 10.34 avg: 11 median: 10.9 (3%) max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 22.94 avg: 24.9 median: 25.2 (7%) max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.22 avg: 0.5 median: 0.6 (1%) max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8 avg: 34.5 median: 34.4 (14%) max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.42 avg: 31.7 median: 32.1 (5%) max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3 avg: 24.9 median: 24.9 (4%) max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6851 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
72.4 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 82.7 avg: 95.3 median: 95.3 (6%) max: 107.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
min: 55.3 avg: 67.1 median: 67.1 (4%) max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
min: 97.8 avg: 98.6 median: 98.6 (99%) max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
97.8 fps (2%)
69.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
133.5 fps (8%)
101.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
198.3 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482 avg: 658 median: 658 (3%) max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718 avg: 1079 median: 1079 (2%) max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 100% n=11 Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 73% n=11
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
37.4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.1 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.5 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
127.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
44.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
31.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
15.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
70.3 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
18.7 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
59.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
60.4 ~ 60 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
25.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
46.3 ~ 36 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
18.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
25.2 ~ 22 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
13.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
19.5 ~ 17 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
55.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
62.2 ~ 59 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
31.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
36.6 ~ 34 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
17.8 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
20.4 ~ 19 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
14.4 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
4.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M620:
110.6 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
64.3 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
28.9 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
24.4 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
76.5 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
57.3 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
29 fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.9 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
53.9 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
32.8 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
18.6 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
118.5 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
28.2 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
190.5 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
139.6 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
114.4 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
17.8 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
51.7 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
44.4 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
27.1 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
11.7 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
192.8 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
147.4 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
39.1 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
176.4 fps
59%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
104.6 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
105.6 fps
57%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
60 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
92.3 fps
56%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
51.6 fps
100%
Quadro M620:
35.6 fps
62%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.1 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 59% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 56%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 low med. high ultra QHD 4K X-Plane 11.11 37.4 26.1 22.5 Dota 2 Reborn 76.5 57.3 29 26.9 BioShock Infinite 104.6 60 51.6 22.1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2
NVIDIA Quadro M620 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rocket League 127.1 44.9 31.9 15.7 Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III 70.3 18.7 Doom 60 36 22 17 Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 34 19 14.4 4.9 Star Wars Battlefront 110.6 64.3 28.92 24.37 The Witcher 3 53.9 32.83 18.62 10 Dirt Rally 249 118.5 62 28.2 Total War: Rome II 190.5 139.6 114.4 17.8 Company of Heroes 2 51.7 44.4 27.1 11.7 GRID 2 192.8 147.4 126 39.1 BioShock Infinite 176.4 105.6 92.3 35.6 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 5 1 5 3 2 5 1 3 1 7 2 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 27. 06:35:10
#0 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:40:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.091s ... 0.092s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.092s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.092s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.041s ... 0.132s
#8 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.016s ... 0.148s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0.002s ... 0.15s
#10 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.007s ... 0.157s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.157s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.195s ... 0.352s
#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.352s
#14 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.36s
#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.36s
#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.369s
#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.029s ... 0.398s
#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.398s
#19 return log +0.036s ... 0.434s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)