Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 510 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

Intel HD Graphics 510

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 510

The Intel HD Graphics 510 (GT1) is an integrated graphics unit, which can be found in low-end ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processors of the Skylake generation. This "GT1" version of the Skylake GPU offers 12 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 950 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 510 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Performance

Depending on various factors like memory configuration, the HD Graphics 510 should perform sligthly below the older HD Graphics 4400 and will handle modern games (as of 2015) only in lowest settings (if it does at all).

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The HD Graphics 510 can be found in mobile processors specified at 15 W TDP and is therefore suited for compact laptops and ultrabooks.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 617 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 617 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process. Compared to the similar UHD Graphics 615 in other Amber Lake models, the 617 looks to be higher clocked (+50 MHz) and has more headroom due to the higher TDP of 7 versus 5 Watt.

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 617 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 617 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 / 617 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 617 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 617 can be found in Y processors with 7 W TDP  and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled subnotebooks like the MacBook Air 2018.

Intel HD Graphics 510Intel UHD Graphics 617
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameSkylake GT1Kaby-Lake GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9 SkylakeGen. 9 Amber Lake
Pipelines12 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 950 (Boost) MHz300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement01.09.2015 30.10.2018
CPU in HD Graphics 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-6198DU2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 4405U2 x 2100 MHz, 15 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz950 - 1000 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 617GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-10510Y4 x 1200 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8210Y2 x 1600 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz950 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 510
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 322     avg: 338.3     median: 337 (1%)     max: 356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 286     avg: 299     median: 300 (1%)     max: 311 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
43274 Points (5%)
77156 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
26846 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4721 Points (5%)
4841 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5664 Points (1%)
7231 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
570 Points (1%)
min: 845     avg: 890     median: 889.5 (2%)     max: 934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
621 Points (1%)
min: 947     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
62653 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
3711 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
4496 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
985 Points (1%)
min: 1632     avg: 1672     median: 1671.5 (2%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
847 Points (1%)
min: 1509     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (1%)     max: 1572 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3798 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3125 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark 06
7253 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 617
8662 Points (11%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
9.3 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
10.8 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
13.5 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
7348 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
17.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (2%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
min: 34.7     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (2%)     max: 43.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
35.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
51.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
64.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 510
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
121.9 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
167 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
302 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
500 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 510 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 148% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
20.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.1  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
12.8  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
61.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
26  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
18.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
18.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
15.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
70.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
41.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
24.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
9.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
13.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
7.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
11.1  fps
145%
UHD Graphics 617:
16.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
25  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
11  fps
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
48.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
29.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
38.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
25.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
66.2  fps
102%
UHD Graphics 617:
67.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
41.8  fps
67%
UHD Graphics 617:
28.2  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
13.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
110.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
19.3  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
30.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
26.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
31.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
22.2  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
72  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
47  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
173.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
32.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
135.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
32.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
22.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 510:
39  fps
122%
UHD Graphics 617:
47.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
20.1  fps
139%
UHD Graphics 617:
27.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
17.7  fps
141%
UHD Graphics 617:
25  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
8.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
52.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
23.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 510:
16.2  fps

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 510 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 119%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 112%

Intel UHD Graphics 617lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.214.112.8
Rocket League61.22618.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16.1
Dota 2 Reborn67.228.214.613.6
BioShock Infinite47.627.9258.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1
2
4


4


2








Intel HD Graphics 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Resident Evil 718.3
Titanfall 219.915.4
Farming Simulator 1770.641.3
Civilization VI24.59.4
The Division13.47.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider11.17
Rainbow Six Siege2515.9
Anno 220519.911
World of Warships48.729.2
Metal Gear Solid V38.925.2
Dota 2 Reborn66.241.8
Dirt Rally110.419.3
GTA V30.926.8
Battlefield Hardline31.522.2
F1 20147247
Sims 4173.732.2
GRID: Autosport135.532.8
Battlefield 433.422.515.9
BioShock Infinite3920.117.7
Tomb Raider52.723.916.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
7
4
2
14
5

3











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 17:45:46

#0 checking url part for id 6475 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9356 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.096s ... 0.097s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.097s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6475 +0.041s ... 0.138s

#8 got single benchmarks 6475 +0.018s ... 0.156s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9356 +0.002s ... 0.157s

#10 got single benchmarks 9356 +0.008s ... 0.166s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.166s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.207s ... 0.373s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.373s

#14 Got 57 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.379s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.379s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 0.393s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.051s ... 0.443s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.443s

#19 return log +0.038s ... 0.481s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)