Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2600

Samsung Exynos 2600

The Samsung Exynos 2600 is an SoC for smartphones and tablets and the first chip that uses the new Samsung 2nm GAA process.

Samsung uses a total of 10 cores based on the new ARM Lumex architecture which is also used in the Dimensity 9500 and thus competes with the eight Oryon cores in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. The C1 Ultra Prime core operates at up to 3.8 Ghz, three C1-Pro cores at a maximum of 3.25 Ghz and six C1-Pro cores at up to 2.75 Ghz, plus a Samsung Xclipse 960 GPU and a 32K Mac NPU, which, according to Samsung, increases Gen AI performance by 113% compared to its predecessor.

According to Samsung, the performance is up to 39% better than its predecessor Exynos 2500. Our benchmarks show a performance that is slightly below the Apple A18 (e.g. iPhone 16). The integrated Heat Path Block (HPB), which sits like a heat sink directly on the Exynos 2600 next to the DRAM, prevents heat build-up.

SeriesSamsung Exynos

Series: Exynos

Samsung Exynos 2600 « 2.75 - 3.8 GHz10 / 10 cores
Samsung Exynos 2500 compare1.8 - 3.3 GHz10 / 10 cores
Samsung Exynos 1280 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock Rate2750 - 3800 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads10 / 10
1 x 3.8 GHz ARM C1-Ultra
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM C1-Pro
6 x 2.8 GHz ARM C1-Pro
Manufacturing Technology2 nm
FeaturesLPDDR5X, UFS 4.1, ISP for up to 320MP camera sensors and 8K30 videos, 23K MAC NPU
GPUSamsung Xclipse 960
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date12/19/2025
Product Link (external)semiconductor.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Single-Core
min: 3060     avg: 3135     median: 3134.5 (72%)     max: 3209 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Multi-Core
min: 10388     avg: 10711     median: 10711 (36%)     max: 11034 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2099     avg: 2139     median: 2138.5 (72%)     max: 2178 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9447     avg: 9451     median: 9451 (17%)     max: 9455 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 10500     avg: 10762     median: 10761.5 (98%)     max: 11023 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 37127     avg: 38137     median: 38137 (36%)     max: 39147 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 374.4     avg: 381.1     median: 381.1 (0%)     max: 387.8 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85043     avg: 88709     median: 88708.5 (58%)     max: 92374 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 88.3     avg: 89.1     median: 89.1 (57%)     max: 89.8 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 921.37     avg: 1650     median: 1649.7 (46%)     max: 2378 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 46.61     avg: 49.6     median: 49.6 (24%)     max: 52.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 2774     avg: 2788     median: 2788.3 (64%)     max: 2802.55 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 145046     avg: 147698     median: 147698 (65%)     max: 150349 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 19076     avg: 19495     median: 19495 (68%)     max: 19914 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2098     avg: 2178     median: 2177.5 (76%)     max: 2257 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.01     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (4%)     max: 8.27 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.831 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.10.10.20.20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.80.90.9111.11.2Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 25. 10:56:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 25 May 2026 05:29:27 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 21002 +0.006s ... 0.037s

#7 got single benchmarks 21002 +0.011s ... 0.048s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.353s ... 0.4s

#10 return log +0.329s ... 0.729s

Reviews for the Samsung Exynos 2600 processor

Exynos and more battery power make it a star - Samsung Galaxy S26 review

Exynos and more battery power make it a star - Samsung Galaxy S26 review

The Galaxy S26 remains this year's most affordable and compact entry in Samsung's premium segment. Although it offers a well-rounded package that leaves little to be desired, it does appear somewhat dated in some aspects.
Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 6.3", 167 g
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus review

Will the Exynos 2600 save the unwanted flagship? - Samsung Galaxy S26+ review

The fact that a Galaxy S26 Plus was not actually planned for the 2026 lineup is evident in many aspects of the Samsung phone. Is the affordable flagship phone still a good choice in the upper class, thanks to the new Exynos 2600? We answer this question in our test report. Update: Sample photos & game reviews added
Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 6.7", 190 g
With MagSafe, additional buttons and durable - Pitaka Galaxy S26 case review

With MagSafe, additional buttons and durable - Pitaka Galaxy S26 case review

Pitaka offers particularly slim protective cases made of aramid, which are equipped with configurable buttons. A magnet for Qi2 charging and other accessories is also integrated. They are compatible with all models in the Galaxy S26 series. A recommendation?
Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 6.3", 167 g
With MagSafe, additional buttons and durable - Pitaka Galaxy S26 case review

With MagSafe, additional buttons and durable - Pitaka Galaxy S26 case review

Pitaka offers particularly slim protective cases made of aramid, which are equipped with configurable buttons. A magnet for Qi2 charging and other accessories is also integrated. They are compatible with all models in the Galaxy S26 series. A recommendation?
Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 6.7", 190 g

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S26+

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S26

   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Not allowed to use precise location tracking?

   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Unjustified price increase?

   » The best compact phones compared: Galaxy S26 vs. Xiaomi 17 vs. Vivo X300

   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Has it lost its throne?

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 Plus review verdict: Who should buy Samsung’s new flagship?

   » Exynos 2600 is a bright spot for Samsung’s premium smartphones

   » Galaxy S26 Plus or Galaxy S25 Plus? Here are the differences based on our review

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 with Exynos 2600 shows many disadvantages compared to Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 with Exynos 2600 shows many disadvantages compared to Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 gets cheaper base model, but only for certain customers

   » Samsung Galaxy S26 with Exynos 2600 fails in battery test compared to Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 with Exynos 2600 fails in battery test compared to Snapdragon

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra gets robust dbrand Tank Case before launch

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra gets robust dbrand Tank Case before launch

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Official videos promise better camera at night and improved zoom

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Official videos promise better camera at night and improved zoom

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 (Plus) and S26 Ultra: Absolutely crazy euro prices leaked

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 (Plus) and S26 Ultra: Absolutely crazy euro prices leaked

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus and Galaxy S26 Ultra: Prices detailed by industry insider

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus and Galaxy S26 Ultra: Prices detailed by industry insider

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Leak allegedly reveals official images and specs of Samsung Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26+

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Leak allegedly reveals official images and specs of Samsung Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26+

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 and new wearables: Samsung teaser leak confirms Galaxy Unpacked launch date

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 and new wearables: Samsung teaser leak confirms Galaxy Unpacked launch date

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Leak shows official Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qi2 charger with disappointing limitation

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Leak shows official Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qi2 charger with disappointing limitation

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung unveils intriguing Galaxy S26 Ultra feature prior to official launch

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung unveils intriguing Galaxy S26 Ultra feature prior to official launch

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 without 128GB model: EU retailer leaks all 30 colors and storage options in Europe

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 without 128GB model: EU retailer leaks all 30 colors and storage options in Europe

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Two Samsung flagships will charge faster, 2nm chip almost certain to come to Europe

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Two Samsung flagships will charge faster, 2nm chip almost certain to come to Europe

   » Samsung Galaxy S26+: Little plus in the 2026 model

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Leaked Exynos 2600 GPU benchmark compared with OnePlus 15

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Leaked Exynos 2600 GPU benchmark compared with OnePlus 15

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 appears to be getting a useful camera feature that Apple has had since the iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 appears to be getting a useful camera feature that Apple has had since the iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 and S26 Ultra: Hands-on with detailed dummies in two colors

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 and S26 Ultra: Hands-on with detailed dummies in two colors

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Very late Galaxy Unpacked launch event and even later availability expected

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Very late Galaxy Unpacked launch event and even later availability expected

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung announces world's first 2nm chip for Galaxy S26

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung announces world's first 2nm chip for Galaxy S26

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: First render images found in One UI 8.5 beta

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: First render images found in One UI 8.5 beta

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus and S26 Ultra: Leaker compares almost all specs with Galaxy S25 counterparts

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus and S26 Ultra: Leaker compares almost all specs with Galaxy S25 counterparts

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Samsung officially discusses performance and efficiency of first-ever 2nm chips

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Samsung officially discusses performance and efficiency of first-ever 2nm chips

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » All Samsung S26 models reportedly getting faster wireless charging

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » All Samsung S26 models reportedly getting faster wireless charging

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Exynos 2600 expected to enable impressive camera features

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Exynos 2600 expected to enable impressive camera features

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra reportedly more similar to Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26+ than previously thought

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra reportedly more similar to Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26+ than previously thought

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung confirms many new features for the Galaxy S26, including new camera sensors

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung confirms many new features for the Galaxy S26, including new camera sensors

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: New information points to significantly delayed launch

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: New information points to significantly delayed launch

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 launch rumored to be postponed by months due to massive delays

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 launch rumored to be postponed by months due to massive delays

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: At least one Samsung flagship with Exynos 2600 instead of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 "confirmed"

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: At least one Samsung flagship with Exynos 2600 instead of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 "confirmed"

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 Ultra leaks: Samsung to target professionals with Apple ProRes alternative and big display upgrades

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 Ultra leaks: Samsung to target professionals with Apple ProRes alternative and big display upgrades

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Samsung promises "good results" for Exynos 2600 2nm chip

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Samsung promises "good results" for Exynos 2600 2nm chip

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 family: First accessories affirm camera designs

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 family: First accessories affirm camera designs

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the like: No sign of faster charging in certification

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the like: No sign of faster charging in certification

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Galaxy S26 Pro: Renders reveal design adjustments

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Galaxy S26 Pro: Renders reveal design adjustments

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra reportedly getting "Flex Magic Pixel" display, entire series to get revamped

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra reportedly getting "Flex Magic Pixel" display, entire series to get revamped

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Big differences in battery sizes between Samsung Galaxy S26, Xiaomi 16 and other flagships expected in 2026

   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Firmware analysis confirms 60-watt fast charging and One UI 8.5

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Firmware analysis confirms 60-watt fast charging and One UI 8.5

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 Edge with upgraded camera and Galaxy Ring 2: Early details on Galaxy Unpacked 2026 launch leaked

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26 Edge with upgraded camera and Galaxy Ring 2: Early details on Galaxy Unpacked 2026 launch leaked

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Specific traces point to major changes for Samsung’s next flagship phone lineup

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy S26: Specific traces point to major changes for Samsung’s next flagship phone lineup

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Battery may disappoint once again

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Battery may disappoint once again

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 Ultra: Image allegedly shows thinner screen edges

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 Ultra: Image allegedly shows thinner screen edges

Samsung Galaxy S26: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.30", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Smart camera features instead of new camera hardware

Samsung Galaxy S26+: Samsung Xclipse 960, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy S26: Smart camera features instead of new camera hardware

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Mobile CPU Comparison
Comparison of all mobile CPU series

» Mobile Processors - Benchmarklist
Benchmarklist of all known CPUs that are used in laptops (desktop and laptop CPUs)

Other CPUs of the series Exynos

» Samsung Exynos 2600
   10x 2.75 GHz - 3.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2500
   10x 1.8 GHz - 3.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2200
   8x 1.82 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2100 5G
   8x 2.2 GHz - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1480
   8x 2.05 GHz - 2.75 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 990
   8x 2 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1380
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9825
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.73 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9820
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9810
   8x - 2.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1330
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 1280
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9610
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa
   8x 2.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9611
   8x 1.7 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9609
   8x 1.6 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa
   8x 2.1 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7885
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7880
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa
   8x 1.9 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7884B
   8x 1.56 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7578
   4x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5260 Hexa
   6x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5410 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 7904
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 3470 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 5250 Dual
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad
   4x 1.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz
   2x 1.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
+ Apple M1
   8x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
+ Apple A18 Pro
   6x 2.42 GHz - 4.04 GHz
+ Apple A18
   6x 2.42 GHz - 4.04 GHz
+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2600
   10x 2.75 GHz - 3.8 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.39 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.3 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
   8x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2500
   10x 1.8 GHz - 3.3 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-04-10)