Dirt Showdown Benchmarked

Florian Glaser, 05/26/2012

Dirtier than ever. With Dirt Showdown the race game expert Codemasters follows in the footsteps of the action-packed Flatout series. Traditional rallies are passé for now. The developer focuses on flashy demolition derbies. Find out if the track also pushes mobile graphics cards to their limits.

Dirt Showdown (Artwork: Codemasters)

In the past, particular focus was placed on the rally aspect in the Dirt series. Thanks to the successful mixture of arcade and simulation not only action fans (Need for Speed, Burnout, etc.), but also fans of authenticity were fairly satisfied. Besides the car model and track design, especially the atmosphere and technology convinced.

Graphics

First-rate technology
First-rate technology

The same is true for the latest version. The screenshots show that Dirt Showdown offers outstanding graphics. Few rivals can present such clear textures, authentic reflections and fine shadows. The coherent light impressed us most – depending on the time of day, the levels shine in a different light. Sometimes you would just simply like to dive into the screen. The bundle is finished off with fastidious details such as cheering spectators.

Beyond that, the developer earns praise for the stylish menus that again make a quite complex impression, but whose design fits perfectly to the "destruction" motto.

The hardware requirements have increased a bit compared with Dirt 3. The latest episode occasionally runs noticeably slower when using the same hardware and settings.

Benchmarks

Cool menus
Cool menus

We use the limited demo version for our benchmarks that can be downloaded for free via the online platform Steam. Under "Showdown Tour" "Spy+ Pro" you will discover the 8-ball race that takes place in sunny San Francisco (8 ball refers to the layout).

We wait for booting and the intro video to finish and start recording with the tool Fraps when the user interface (position, health, etc.) appears. The benchmark is stopped on the finish line after exactly one round.

Settings

The graphics options are found in a clearly arranged menu. In addition to resolution, anti-aliasing (Codemasters relies on MSAA) and the screen mode, you can also modify the refresh rate and aspect ratio. To prevent annoying time lapses, VSync should also be enabled (the benchmarks were performed without VSync because of the fps limit). The detail level can be set automatically, manually or via five presets.

Great: Dirt Showdown accepts all modifications directly in a running game. Therefore, unlike other games, there is no need to restart or stop the race when altering the settings. Here are our four test settings:

Ultra setting: 1920 x 1080, ultra preset, 4x MSAA
Ultra setting: 1920 x 1080, ultra preset, 4x MSAA
High setting: 1366 x768, high preset, 2x MSAA
High setting: 1366 x768, high preset, 2x MSAA
Medium setting: 1366 x 768, medium preset
Medium setting: 1366 x 768, medium preset
Low setting: 1024 x 768, ultra low preset
Low setting: 1024 x 768, ultra low preset

As expected, the ultra and high presets do not differ much. With the exception of the coarser shadow (compare picture I and II), you cannot see any significant deviation even when looking closely. Texture quality, illumination and reflections are on a high standard.

Medium settings also look good. However, some objects at the sides (note the spectators in the third picture) do not cast a shadow. There are virtually no shadows or reflections in minimum graphics settings. The absence of spectators also has a negative impact on the atmosphere (picture IV).

Ultra
Ultra
High
High
Medium
Medium
Ultra Low
Ultra Low

Results

If you want to enjoy Dirt Showdown in its full beauty, you will have to fall back on a notebook with a high-end graphics card. Ultra details, 1920x1080 pixels and four-time anti-aliasing, are only properly displayed on a top model, such as the Radeon HD 6990M or GeForce GTX 675M. At least an upper midrange member (e.g. GeForce GT 640M) should be installed in the notebook for high details and two-time anti-aliasing.

Typical multimedia graphics cards on the level of a GeForce GT 630M can only display the medium preset smoothly in higher resolutions. In the meantime, minimum settings are also properly processed by integrated GPUs, such as the HD Graphics 3000 (only applies for low resolutions).

If we rule out the ultra preset, the processor has a surprising amount of impact in Dirt Showdown. Our benchmark chart shows that notebooks with a weaker graphics card frequently overtake notebooks with a stronger GPU model – depending on the installed CPU.

Benchmark chart: Dirt Showdown
Benchmark chart: Dirt Showdown

Test Systems

Parts of the results originate from Schenker Notebooks (mysn.de):

  • XMG P501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GTX 560M, GTX 580M, Radeon HD 6970M & HD 6990M, 8 GB RAM)
  • XMG A501 (Core i7-2630QM, HD Graphics 3000 & GeForce GT 555M, 8 GB RAM)
  • Xesia M501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GT 630M, 4 GB RAM)

Many thanks for the great support!

From left to right: Schenker XMG A501, Xesia M501 & XMG P501
From left to right: Schenker XMG A501, Xesia M501 & XMG P501

In following, a list of all performed benchmarks:

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
 Dirt Showdown (2012)
low
1024x768
Ultra Low Preset
med.
1366x768
Medium Preset
high
1366x768
High Preset
2xMSAA
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
4xMSAA
 3NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
78.6
73.8
55.4
 5AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
92.2
88
87
 6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
85.3
88.8
50.9
 7AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
92.5
87.5
84.2
 11NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
102
77
75
75
 12AMD Radeon HD 7970
87.3
73.1
69.2
61.2
 16NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
103.1
95.1
90.5
77.9
 17NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
90.9
72.9
71.7
62.1
 19NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
112.9
87.8
88
663
 22AMD Radeon HD 7870
87.3
71.2
68.8
53.9
 24AMD Radeon HD 8970M
115.1
85.3
59.252
44.62
 29NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
101.1
81.3
75.52
53.43
 30NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
123.1
93.8
90.2
34.1
 32AMD Radeon HD 7970M
97.7
81.1
78.3
48.73
 34NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
94.5
77
74.6
31.4
 38NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
109.9
85.3
84.9
45.2
 47NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
80.3
84.5
39.4
 48NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
101.3
67.1
23.4
 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
61.9
39
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 52AMD Radeon HD 6870
42
 54NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
122
90.452
81.63
33.63
 58NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
89
81
78
34
 59ATI Radeon HD 5850
85.8
75.6
74.4
42.7
 60NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
115.61
93.01
82.7
34.02
 61NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
79.6
62.6
61.4
34.3
 62AMD Radeon HD 6990M
81.4
62.7
60.1
35.7
 63AMD Radeon HD 7770
94
71
67.9
33.2
 64NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
104.7
74.052
51.352
19.22
 71NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
89
34
 72AMD Radeon HD 6970M
76.6
64.2
59.5
30.3
 73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
93.7
73.3
76.12
31.62
 75NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
81.352
55.252
50.92
30.1
 76NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
101
77
73.22
29.42
 79AMD Radeon HD 8870M
72.92
47.22
37.42
24.52
 81NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
96
84
73
23
 83AMD FirePro M6000
97
90
62
27
 85NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
96
92
56
23
 91NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
74.3
62.5
57.8
25.8
 92NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
81.552
65.82
50.74
23.43
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 94AMD Radeon HD 8850M
70
46.7
31.9
 97AMD Radeon HD 8790M
82
47
27
19
 103NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
108.2
81.8
59
21.2
 104NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
917
61.058
53.911
18.1510
 106NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
97
78
49
15
 107NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
90.652
69.72
51.32
19.7
 109NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
67.8
63
60.5
23
 114NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
64.35
48.85
32.95
17.93
 115NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
992
77.552
40.252
16.752
 118NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
57.5
40.9
14.8
 122AMD FirePro M4000
82
51
40
19
 132NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
51
32.4
19.7
 134*NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
74.62
53.63
39.63
17.2
 136AMD Radeon HD 8750M
71.3
44.3
35.1
15.9
 142NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
753
43.83
393
15.62
 144AMD Radeon HD 7730M
74
45
33
15
 164NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
73.8
55.1
36.1
13.4
 167AMD Radeon HD 8730M
55.2
37.5
33
14.8
 170NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
66.6
61.4
37.1
12.9
 184AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
51
33
29.3
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 187AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
42.1
28.7
25.8
 188AMD Radeon HD 8670M
62
35
22
9
 191NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
92
54
33
10
 208AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
35.82
26.7
25.5
 209*AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
41
30.5
29.6
 210AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
29.6
18.7
16.4
9.3
 211AMD Radeon HD 7670M
60.354
41.14
29.64
11.92
 212NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
76.65
49.156
30.556
123
 219NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
38
31.6
22
 225AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
19.9
11.7
 226AMD Radeon HD 8570M
59.4
29.4
13.6
7
 227NVIDIA Quadro K610M
76
48
32
9
 228AMD Radeon HD 8550M
16.5
11.5
10.4
 233Intel HD Graphics 4600
49.9
26.6
 236NVIDIA NVS 5400M
80.52
56.052
33.62
12
 238AMD Radeon HD 7660G
41
27
25
9.9
 249AMD Radeon HD 7650M
58.8
38
32.9
 250AMD FirePro M2000
88
11
 251AMD Radeon HD 7570M
57
38
16
 254ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
55.2
40.2
30.3
10.4
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 260NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
48.552
33.12
25.32
 263AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
35.4
25.2
22.6
 267AMD Radeon HD 7640G
30.2
 269Intel HD Graphics 4400
41.052
24.82
17
5
 272AMD Radeon HD 7550M
65.4
39.6
25.9
 306Intel HD Graphics 4000
52.656
27.86
17.25
65
 311Intel HD Graphics 4200
34.5
18.9
12.6
4.9
 312AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
742
32.52
222
6.52
 319AMD Radeon HD 8450G
25
14.7
 325AMD Radeon HD 7520G
27.3
15.7
13.3
 335AMD Radeon HD 8330
27.7
20.7
16.2
 360Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
31
18.8
11.7
 390AMD Radeon HD 8250
15.9
12.6
11.5
 397Intel HD Graphics 3000
31.15
17.25
9.55
 400NVIDIA GeForce G210M
32
20
10
 420Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
35.652
13.352
 454*Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
27
13.4
8.6
5
 458Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
28
 504Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
9
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
static version load dynamic

Comment this article:

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Dirt Showdown Benchmarked
Author: Florian Glaser, 2012-05-26 (Update: 2013-09-12)