Notebookcheck

Dirt Showdown Benchmarked

Florian Glaser, 05/26/2012

Dirtier than ever. With Dirt Showdown the race game expert Codemasters follows in the footsteps of the action-packed Flatout series. Traditional rallies are passé for now. The developer focuses on flashy demolition derbies. Find out if the track also pushes mobile graphics cards to their limits.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted:
News Editor, Review Editor
(Smartphones) - Details here

Dirt Showdown (Artwork: Codemasters)

In the past, particular focus was placed on the rally aspect in the Dirt series. Thanks to the successful mixture of arcade and simulation not only action fans (Need for Speed, Burnout, etc.), but also fans of authenticity were fairly satisfied. Besides the car model and track design, especially the atmosphere and technology convinced.

Graphics

First-rate technology
First-rate technology

The same is true for the latest version. The screenshots show that Dirt Showdown offers outstanding graphics. Few rivals can present such clear textures, authentic reflections and fine shadows. The coherent light impressed us most – depending on the time of day, the levels shine in a different light. Sometimes you would just simply like to dive into the screen. The bundle is finished off with fastidious details such as cheering spectators.

Beyond that, the developer earns praise for the stylish menus that again make a quite complex impression, but whose design fits perfectly to the "destruction" motto.

The hardware requirements have increased a bit compared with Dirt 3. The latest episode occasionally runs noticeably slower when using the same hardware and settings.

Benchmarks

Cool menus
Cool menus

We use the limited demo version for our benchmarks that can be downloaded for free via the online platform Steam. Under "Showdown Tour" "Spy+ Pro" you will discover the 8-ball race that takes place in sunny San Francisco (8 ball refers to the layout).

We wait for booting and the intro video to finish and start recording with the tool Fraps when the user interface (position, health, etc.) appears. The benchmark is stopped on the finish line after exactly one round.

Settings

The graphics options are found in a clearly arranged menu. In addition to resolution, anti-aliasing (Codemasters relies on MSAA) and the screen mode, you can also modify the refresh rate and aspect ratio. To prevent annoying time lapses, VSync should also be enabled (the benchmarks were performed without VSync because of the fps limit). The detail level can be set automatically, manually or via five presets.

Great: Dirt Showdown accepts all modifications directly in a running game. Therefore, unlike other games, there is no need to restart or stop the race when altering the settings. Here are our four test settings:

Ultra setting: 1920 x 1080, ultra preset, 4x MSAA
Ultra setting: 1920 x 1080, ultra preset, 4x MSAA
High setting: 1366 x768, high preset, 2x MSAA
High setting: 1366 x768, high preset, 2x MSAA
Medium setting: 1366 x 768, medium preset
Medium setting: 1366 x 768, medium preset
Low setting: 1024 x 768, ultra low preset
Low setting: 1024 x 768, ultra low preset

As expected, the ultra and high presets do not differ much. With the exception of the coarser shadow (compare picture I and II), you cannot see any significant deviation even when looking closely. Texture quality, illumination and reflections are on a high standard.

Medium settings also look good. However, some objects at the sides (note the spectators in the third picture) do not cast a shadow. There are virtually no shadows or reflections in minimum graphics settings. The absence of spectators also has a negative impact on the atmosphere (picture IV).

Ultra
Ultra
High
High
Medium
Medium
Ultra Low
Ultra Low

Results

If you want to enjoy Dirt Showdown in its full beauty, you will have to fall back on a notebook with a high-end graphics card. Ultra details, 1920x1080 pixels and four-time anti-aliasing, are only properly displayed on a top model, such as the Radeon HD 6990M or GeForce GTX 675M. At least an upper midrange member (e.g. GeForce GT 640M) should be installed in the notebook for high details and two-time anti-aliasing.

Typical multimedia graphics cards on the level of a GeForce GT 630M can only display the medium preset smoothly in higher resolutions. In the meantime, minimum settings are also properly processed by integrated GPUs, such as the HD Graphics 3000 (only applies for low resolutions).

If we rule out the ultra preset, the processor has a surprising amount of impact in Dirt Showdown. Our benchmark chart shows that notebooks with a weaker graphics card frequently overtake notebooks with a stronger GPU model – depending on the installed CPU.

Benchmark chart: Dirt Showdown
Benchmark chart: Dirt Showdown

Test Systems

Parts of the results originate from Schenker Notebooks (mysn.de):

  • XMG P501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GTX 560M, GTX 580M, Radeon HD 6970M & HD 6990M, 8 GB RAM)
  • XMG A501 (Core i7-2630QM, HD Graphics 3000 & GeForce GT 555M, 8 GB RAM)
  • Xesia M501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GT 630M, 4 GB RAM)

Many thanks for the great support!

From left to right: Schenker XMG A501, Xesia M501 & XMG P501
From left to right: Schenker XMG A501, Xesia M501 & XMG P501
Discussion

In following, a list of all performed benchmarks:

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
 Dirt Showdown (2012)
low
1024x768
Ultra Low Preset
med.
1366x768
Medium Preset
high
1366x768
High Preset
2xMSAA
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
4xMSAA
 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
78.6
73.8
55.4
 20AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
92.2
88
87
 21NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
85.3
88.8
50.9
 22AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
92.5
87.5
84.2
 31NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
102
77
75
75
 32AMD Radeon HD 7970
87.3
73.1
69.2
61.2
 43NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
103.1
95.1
90.5
77.9
 46NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
90.9
72.9
71.7
62.1
 48NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
112.9
87.8
88
663
 51AMD Radeon HD 7870
87.3
71.2
68.8
53.9
 52NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
98.1
90.6
65.9
 56AMD Radeon HD 8970M
115.1
85.3
59.252
44.62
 60NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
101.1
81.3
75.52
53.43
 61NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
123.1
93.8
90.2
34.1
 64AMD Radeon HD 7970M
97.7
81.1
78.3
48.73
 67NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
94.5
77
74.6
31.4
 74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
109.9
85.3
84.9
45.2
 75NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
96.9
91.6
48.4
 81NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
80.3
84.5
39.4
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 82NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
101.3
67.1
23.4
 84NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
61.9
39
 89AMD Radeon HD 6870
42
 92NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
122
90.452
81.63
33.63
 96NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
89
81
78
34
 99ATI Radeon HD 5850
85.8
75.6
74.4
42.7
 100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
115.61
93.01
82.7
34.02
 101NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
79.6
62.6
61.4
34.3
 102AMD Radeon HD 6990M
81.4
62.7
60.1
35.7
 106AMD Radeon HD 7770
94
71
67.9
33.2
 107NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
104.7
74.052
51.352
19.22
 114NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
89
34
 117NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
93.7
73.3
76.12
31.62
 119NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
81.352
55.252
50.92
30.1
 121NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
101
77
73.22
29.42
 125AMD Radeon HD 6970M
76.6
64.2
59.5
30.3
 127AMD Radeon HD 8870M
72.92
47.22
37.42
24.52
 129NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
96
84
73
23
 131AMD FirePro M6000
97
90
62
27
 132AMD FirePro M5100
107
94
78
27
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 133NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
96
92
56
23
 139NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
74.3
62.5
57.8
25.8
 140NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
81.552
65.82
50.74
23.43
 142AMD Radeon HD 8850M
70
46.7
31.9
 144AMD Radeon R9 M265X
92.9
74.5
68.9
21.8
 147AMD Radeon HD 8790M
82
47
27
19
 155NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
108.2
81.8
59
21.2
 157NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
97
78
49
15
 164NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
917
61.058
53.911
18.1510
 165NVIDIA Quadro K620M
98
75
52
17
 168NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
90.652
69.72
51.32
19.7
 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
67.8
63
60.5
23
 175NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
64.35
48.85
32.95
17.93
 181NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
992
77.552
40.252
16.752
 184NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
57.5
40.9
14.8
 188AMD FirePro M4000
82
51
40
19
 199NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
51
32.4
19.7
 201*NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
74.62
53.63
39.63
17.2
 203AMD Radeon HD 8750M
71.3
44.3
35.1
15.9
 210NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
753
43.83
393
15.62
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 214AMD Radeon HD 7730M
74
45
33
15
 243NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
73.8
55.1
36.1
13.4
 246AMD Radeon HD 8730M
55.2
37.5
33
14.8
 249NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
66.6
61.4
37.1
12.9
 265AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
51
33
29.3
 268AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
42.1
28.7
25.8
 269AMD Radeon HD 8670M
62
35
22
9
 273NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
92
54
33
10
 290AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
35.82
26.7
25.5
 291*AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
41
30.5
29.6
 292AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
29.6
18.7
16.4
9.3
 293AMD Radeon HD 7670M
60.354
41.14
29.64
11.92
 294NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
76.65
49.156
30.556
123
 302NVIDIA GeForce 820M
48
31.6
27.6
 305NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
38
31.6
22
 313AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
19.9
11.7
 314AMD Radeon HD 8570M
59.4
29.4
13.6
7
 315Intel HD Graphics 6000
57
36
23
10
 316NVIDIA Quadro K610M
76
48
32
9
 317AMD Radeon HD 8550M
16.5
11.5
10.4
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 323Intel HD Graphics 4600
49.9
26.6
 325Intel HD Graphics 5500
51.4
30
21.9
 329NVIDIA NVS 5400M
80.52
56.052
33.62
12
 331AMD Radeon HD 7660G
41
27
25
9.9
 342AMD Radeon HD 7650M
58.8
38
32.9
 343AMD FirePro M2000
88
11
 344AMD Radeon HD 7570M
57
38
16
 347ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
55.2
40.2
30.3
10.4
 353NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
48.552
33.12
25.32
 356AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
35.4
25.2
22.6
 360AMD Radeon HD 7640G
30.2
 367Intel HD Graphics 4400
41.052
24.82
17
5
 371AMD Radeon HD 7550M
65.4
39.6
25.9
 406Intel HD Graphics 4000
52.656
27.86
17.25
65
 413AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
29.2
21.1
16.4
 414Intel HD Graphics 4200
34.5
18.9
12.6
4.9
 416AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
742
32.52
222
6.52
 423AMD Radeon HD 8450G
25
14.7
 430AMD Radeon HD 7520G
27.3
15.7
13.3
 440AMD Radeon HD 8330
27.7
20.7
16.2
Pos      Model                                     Dirt Showdown
lowmed.highultra
 443AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
31.2
21.3
17
 469Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
31
18.8
11.7
 501AMD Radeon HD 8250
15.9
12.6
11.5
 508Intel HD Graphics 3000
31.15
17.25
9.55
 511NVIDIA GeForce G210M
32
20
10
 530Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
35.652
13.352
 564*Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
27
13.4
8.6
5
 569Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
28
 618Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
9
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article:
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Dirt Showdown Benchmarked
Florian Glaser, 2012-05-26 (Update: 2013-09-12)