Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900HX vs Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

The performance should be higher than the old Core i9-12900HX due to more E-cores and probably higher clock speeds.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

Intel Core i9-13950HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13950HX

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) clocked from 2.2 to 5.5 GHz (single core, all core boost 4.9 GHz) with HyperThreading and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading clocked from 1.6 to 4 GHz. The 13950HX is very similar to the Core i9-13980HX, but with vPro Enterprise support and a 100 MHz reduced boost of the P-cores.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).

The performance should be higher than the old Core i9-12900HX due to more E-cores and probably higher clock speeds.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900HXIntel Core i9-13950HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX « 1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5400 MHz1600 - 5500 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 3224 / 32
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Raptor Lake-HX i9-13900HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX i9-13950HX

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
75.1 pt (84%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
74.8 pt (84%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 26407     avg: 28963     median: 28707 (47%)     max: 32623 Points
min: 26736     avg: 29956     median: 28681 (47%)     max: 33277 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2035     avg: 2071     median: 2079.5 (92%)     max: 2095 Points
min: 1952     avg: 2054     median: 2076 (91%)     max: 2113 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 756     avg: 789     median: 793 (91%)     max: 805 Points
min: 742     avg: 780     median: 797 (92%)     max: 803 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9992     avg: 11226     median: 11289 (48%)     max: 12541 Points
min: 8697     avg: 11115     median: 10919 (46%)     max: 12648 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4302     avg: 4718     median: 4821 (50%)     max: 4970 Points
min: 4339     avg: 4739     median: 4529 (47%)     max: 5227 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 278     avg: 296     median: 298 (91%)     max: 301 Points
min: 274     avg: 290.4     median: 297 (91%)     max: 303 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
55.1 Points (78%)
60 Points (85%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (12%)
3.6 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11618 Points (95%)
11424 Points (93%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
81881 Points (89%)
80693 Points (88%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12956 Points (75%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 94649     avg: 116392     median: 118715 (73%)     max: 127283 MIPS
min: 108860     avg: 117837     median: 116665 (72%)     max: 127295 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6800     avg: 6937     median: 6925 (83%)     max: 7070 MIPS
min: 6445     avg: 6800     median: 6880 (82%)     max: 7064 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
217.7 fps (79%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
387.7 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 25.2     avg: 30.6     median: 31 (66%)     max: 34.4 fps
min: 28.7     avg: 31.5     median: 31 (67%)     max: 34.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.8 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175     avg: 208.4     median: 197 (3%)     max: 290 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 195.8     median: 196 (3%)     max: 224 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 101     avg: 113     median: 108.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
min: 100     avg: 108.6     median: 111 (1%)     max: 117 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4049 sec
min: 0.3823     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4121 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16591     avg: 17649     median: 17884 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
19311 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.2 s (1%)
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
315 s (1%)
322.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (71%)     max: 77763 Points
79200 Points (74%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22494     avg: 24466     median: 24629 (68%)     max: 25570 Points
min: 21077     avg: 24548     median: 25874 (71%)     max: 27078 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
101046 Points (65%)
81602 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77857 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81621 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16532     avg: 21902     median: 22879 (58%)     max: 23601 Points
16332 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 34344     avg: 38715     median: 38445 (71%)     max: 43004 Points
min: 31279     avg: 37833     median: 39372 (73%)     max: 42199 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13899     avg: 15138     median: 14910 (74%)     max: 17729 Points
min: 13744     avg: 14796     median: 14781 (73%)     max: 16062 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1988     avg: 2047     median: 2048 (89%)     max: 2093 Points
min: 1805     avg: 1988     median: 2035 (88%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19425     avg: 20427     median: 20371 (71%)     max: 21075 Points
min: 16776     avg: 19490     median: 20036 (70%)     max: 21853 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1982     avg: 2023     median: 2023 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
min: 1856     avg: 1966     median: 1993 (9%)     max: 2048 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20138     avg: 20366     median: 20366 (64%)     max: 20594 Points
min: 17259     avg: 19513     median: 19714 (62%)     max: 21567 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706     avg: 8816     median: 8823 (91%)     max: 8912 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 71048     avg: 71260     median: 71146.5 (79%)     max: 71700 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 453     avg: 459.6     median: 458 (1%)     max: 470 ms
min: 461     avg: 471.2     median: 474 (1%)     max: 478 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 103988     avg: 104431     median: 104431 (100%)     max: 104874 Points
103911 Points (99%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 283     avg: 298.3     median: 303 (90%)     max: 304 Points
min: 279     avg: 288.6     median: 283 (84%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 321     avg: 335     median: 327.5 (80%)     max: 358 Points
min: 266     avg: 297.3     median: 292 (72%)     max: 346 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1991     avg: 2095     median: 2119 (82%)     max: 2195 Points
min: 1592     avg: 1955     median: 2019 (78%)     max: 2139 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.1     avg: 157     median: 162.9 (28%)     max: 200 Watt
min: 134.5     avg: 192.8     median: 205 (35%)     max: 223 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 193.5     avg: 222.6     median: 225 (47%)     max: 247 Watt
min: 191.7     avg: 219.7     median: 204 (43%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 23.6     median: 24.9 (24%)     max: 28.4 Watt
min: 14.2     avg: 22.3     median: 20.1 (19%)     max: 35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 17.9     median: 17.8 (21%)     max: 22.6 Watt
min: 15.5     avg: 19.9     median: 17 (21%)     max: 27.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.5     avg: 20.7     median: 20.7 (24%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt
min: 20.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.4 (25%)     max: 22 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 98% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 29. 03:24:50

#0 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.038s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.009s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.024s ... 0.108s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.289s ... 0.397s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.421s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)