Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8650U vs AMD Ryzen 7 1800X vs Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 1800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the fastest model at the time of announcement.

The CPU cores clock from 3.6 base speed up to 4.1 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 4 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.7 GHz. Therefore, the CPU offers 200 MHz more than the Ryzen 7 1700X.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review.

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4417U

The Intel Pentium Gold Processor 4417U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry level laptops based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2019 and integrates two "big" cores (similar to the Core i3, i5 and i7 CPUs) clocked at 2.3 GHz (fixed, no Turbo Boost). The integrated graphics card is named Intel HD Graphics 610 and offers 12 EUs clocked at 300 - 950 MHz. The integrated memory controller supports slower memory speeds than the faster i3 and i5 models (DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600) and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

With a fixed clock speed of 2.3 GHz, the dual core CPU is clearly slower than models with Turbo Boost and high clock speeds for single thread performance. The multi thread performance however is also limited due to the two cores. The faster Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and  fast Turbo Boost speeds therefore offers a much better performance. Still, the Pentium 4417U offers enough performance for daily tasks and non demanding applications.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 12.5 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down) with a clearly reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-8650UAMD Ryzen 7 1800XIntel Pentium Gold 4417U
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshAMD Ryzen 7Intel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshZenKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X « 3.6 - 4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X3.4 - 3.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 17003 - 3.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U « 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4200 MHz3600 - 4000 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 162 / 4
TDP15 Watt95 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1356AM4BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreading
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$409 U.S.$499 U.S.$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Transistors4800 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 1800X
31.3 pt (43%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8891 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
939 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 394     avg: 398.5     median: 398.5 (44%)     max: 403 Points
203 Points (23%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3544     avg: 3611     median: 3610.5 (9%)     max: 3677 Points
472 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
min: 1598     avg: 1620     median: 1618 (10%)     max: 1647 Points
228 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (51%)     max: 178 Points
min: 157     avg: 160.7     median: 160.8 (48%)     max: 164 Points
89 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
18 Points (23%)
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.04 Points
1.8 Points (45%)
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
5062 Points (31%)
3570 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
32833 Points (24%)
8012 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
min: 103     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (1%)     max: 104 s
665 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
min: 3.8     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (1%)     max: 5.4 s
21.2 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
min: 3814     avg: 3967     median: 3967 (6%)     max: 4120 Points
1792 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 40195     avg: 40776     median: 40776 (23%)     max: 41357 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3907     avg: 4062     median: 4062 (49%)     max: 4217 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (14%)     max: 41.98 fps
min: 73     avg: 84     median: 84 (29%)     max: 95 fps
15.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
min: 163     avg: 179     median: 179 (41%)     max: 195 fps
81.1 fps (19%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.69     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 9.83 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
1.5 GB/s (26%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
min: 9.6     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (25%)     max: 9.8 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 290     avg: 294.8     median: 294.8 (2%)     max: 299.5 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.685 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
min: 8462     avg: 9302     median: 9585 (20%)     max: 9858 Points
3204 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
12.7 s (3%)
17.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
27.1 s (1%)
39.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
613 s (3%)
922 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (17%)
54690 Points (48%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (19%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 12983     avg: 13638     median: 13782 (37%)     max: 14150 Points
min: 2831     avg: 3011     median: 3010.5 (8%)     max: 3190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
min: 68390     avg: 69090     median: 69090 (56%)     max: 69790 Points
min: 28577     avg: 28749     median: 28749 (23%)     max: 28921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
min: 67876     avg: 68235     median: 68234.5 (55%)     max: 68593 Points
min: 27361     avg: 27522     median: 27521.5 (22%)     max: 27682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (48%)     max: 58675 Points
min: 66264     avg: 67071     median: 67070.5 (57%)     max: 67877 Points
min: 29007     avg: 29032     median: 29032 (24%)     max: 29057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
min: 13294     avg: 13818     median: 13818 (35%)     max: 14342 Points
min: 2590     avg: 2591     median: 2590.5 (7%)     max: 2591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 18915     avg: 19158     median: 19232 (34%)     max: 19328 Points
min: 3635     avg: 3644     median: 3644 (6%)     max: 3653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 7497     avg: 7917     median: 8003 (34%)     max: 8252 Points
min: 1369     avg: 1398     median: 1398 (6%)     max: 1427 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 969     avg: 1072     median: 1023 (43%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6372     avg: 6646     median: 6545 (12%)     max: 7021 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 983     avg: 1007     median: 1006.5 (4%)     max: 1030 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6850     avg: 7036     median: 7036 (22%)     max: 7222 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4274     avg: 4489     median: 4488.5 (45%)     max: 4703 Points
2695 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25106     avg: 26147     median: 26147 (29%)     max: 27188 Points
5248 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4481     avg: 4490     median: 4490 (61%)     max: 4499 Points
2599 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21180     avg: 21595     median: 21594.5 (53%)     max: 22009 Points
5029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
30389 Points (54%)
4882 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4014 Points (78%)
2254 Points (44%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5089 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2389 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
9682 Points (78%)
6053 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7385 Points (67%)
5722 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
27037 Points (53%)
4999 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
24878 Points (50%)
5090 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
20615 Points (54%)
5280 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
min: 931     avg: 945     median: 948 (1%)     max: 955 ms
2162 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
107.7 ms (1%)
165.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (30%)     max: 42822 Points
31263 Points (28%)
16702 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
min: 186     avg: 186.5     median: 186.5 (39%)     max: 187 Points
102 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
155 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
162 Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1800X → 152% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4417U → 59% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 10:41:59

#0 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8514 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11489 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.049s ... 0.091s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8514 +0.022s ... 0.113s

#10 got single benchmarks 8514 +0.026s ... 0.139s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11489 +0.003s ... 0.142s

#12 got single benchmarks 11489 +0.014s ... 0.156s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.156s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.508s ... 0.664s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.664s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)