MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC Review
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
For the original German review, see here.
Our GeForce GT 1030 review sample, a GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC, was provided by MSI. The company has a total of six different 1030-based graphics cards on offer right now, and all six of them feature 2 GB of 64-bit GDDR5 VRAM.
The cards differ in terms of connectivity, cooling solution, and size. For example, two low-profile PCBs for small cases are available, one with passive and one with active cooling. This is also the case with the normal-sized GT 1030, but unlike the low-profile cards, they lack the DisplayPort connector on the back. Why MSI has made this decision remains a mystery.
All six cards lack additional power connectors and are thus powered through the PCIe slot alone, and have a TDP of 30 W. This is low enough, even for the passively cooled models that use up two slots in order to ensure proper cooling. Accordingly, the actively-cooled models are smaller and only use up a single slot. Despite the fact that the cards only use four PCIe lanes internally, the external connector requires a PCIe x16 slot.
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
MSI Portfolio GeForce GT 1030






Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Specifications | MSI GT 1030 | Zotac GT 1030 | Zotac GTX 1050 Mini | GTX 1050 Ti | GTX 1060 6 GB | GTX 1070 FE | GTX 1080 FE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chip | GP108 | GP108 | GP107 | GP107 | GP106 | GP104 | GP104 |
Manufactured | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm | 16 nm | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Shader | 384 | 384 | 640 | 768 | 1,280 | 1,920 | 2,560 |
Texture Units | 32 | 32 | 40 | 48 | 80 | 120 | 160 |
GPU Base Clock | 1,265 MHz | 1,228 MHz | 1,354 MHz | 1,290 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,607 MHz |
GPU Boost Clock | 1,518 MHz | 1,468 MHz | 1,455 MHz | 1,392 MHz | 1,848 MHz | 1,683 MHz | 1,733 MHz |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | 64 Bit | 128 Bit | 128 Bit | 192 Bit | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 48 GB/s | 112 GB/s | 112 GB/s | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Memory Size | 2 GB | 2 GB | 2 GB | 4 GB | 6 GB | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Power (Watt) | 30 W | 30 W | 75 W | 75 W | 120 W | 150 W | 180 W |
Case | Corsair Carbide Air 540 ATX Cube |
Processor | AMD RYZEN 7 1800X |
RAM | Corsair Vengeance 16 GB DDR4 3.000 MHz |
Mainboard | Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370 Gaming 5 |
Monitor | Acer Predator XB321HK 4K |
SSD | ADATA SP900 M.2 SSD |
HDD | 2 TB Western Digital |
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 10 Professional 64-Bit |
Drivers | ForceWare 384.80 |
Clock Speeds
Our GT 1030 review model runs at 1265 MHz with a turbo boost of up to 1518 MHz and a VRAM clock speed of up to 6008 MHz, resulting in a memory bandwidth of 48.1 GB/s. During our load tests, clock rates fluctuated between 1500 and 1600 MHz, but given that this is a passively cooled card it requires a properly cooled case. As soon as the GPU reaches its thermal limit of 83 °C (~181 °F) it starts to throttle.
That said, during our tests we got nowhere near that limit.
Synthetic Benchmarks
Performance Rating - Percent | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX -1! |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
Gaming Benchmarks
As expected, the MSI GT 1030 ranked slightly better than the Zotac GT 1030 in our gaming benchmarks as well, and the graphics card’s higher clock speeds resulted in higher frame rates. While the difference was measurable, it was far from perceptible. In the end, both cards performed similarly and were about as fast as an Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M.
The MSI GeForce GT 1030 was certainly fast enough for casual gaming despite the fact that it ran out of VRAM on higher resolutions regularly. Limiting yourself to the likes of “FIFA 17” or “Farming Simulator 17” will result in decent performance at a very good price.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) -14! | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) -8! | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) -13! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 -16! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) -8! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti -19! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) -7! | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) -5! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M -20! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M -19! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) -3! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M -19! | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX -17! | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M -19! |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 High Preset | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
Sims 4 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
The Division - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
FIFA 17 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Farming Simulator 17 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS AF:2x | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 High / Enabled AA:TS AF:8x | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Watch Dogs 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Mass Effect Andromeda - 1920x1080 High Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III - 1920x1080 High / On (100 % Gameplay Resolution) AA:High | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
Prey - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:8x | |
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 221 | 120 | 101.2 | 37.1 | |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 171.5 | 110 | 77.2 | 32.1 | |
Sims 4 (2014) | 189.1 | 156 | 110.5 | 72.3 | |
GTA V (2015) | 162.9 | 144.6 | 39 | 19.6 | 12.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69 | 42.1 | 21.5 | 12 | |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 144.1 | 90.2 | 46.5 | 36.3 | 11 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 75.3 | 45.9 | 23.9 | 20.1 | 8 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 68 | 31 | 27 | 20 | 7 |
The Division (2016) | 78.3 | 47.6 | 11.9 | 8.3 | 6.9 |
Doom (2016) | 93.3 | 66.4 | 29.8 | 21.5 | 10.2 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 51.1 | 36.6 | 18.6 | 12 | 4.9 |
FIFA 17 (2016) | 252 | 188.4 | 103 | 97.6 | 34.8 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 234.5 | 174.6 | 83.5 | 56.6 | 17.9 |
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 55.7 | 47.5 | 21.9 | 14.8 | 6.2 |
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 119 | 57.9 | 34.6 | 8.9 | 8.5 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 57.5 | 23 | 18.8 | 15.8 | 5.6 |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 67.5 | 24.7 | 13.1 | 9 | 10 |
Prey (2017) | 109.9 | 35.3 | 31.4 | 29.1 | 10 |
Rocket League (2017) | 187.2 | 74.7 | 51.5 | ||
Dirt 4 (2017) | 145.1 | 59.5 | 37.7 | 19 |
Compute Performance
Its low count of shader units (384) renders the GT 1030 comparatively slow in regards to general purpose computing. Both GT 1030 cards performed similarly and are not suitable for professional use.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + MSI GT 1030, R7 1800X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030, E5-2680 v4 | AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop) AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference, 4790K | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB, 6700K | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB, 4790K | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 4790K | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB, 4790K | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M MSI PX60 6QD, 6700HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB, 4790K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Rating | |||||||||
Percent | 28.2 | 27.8 -1% | 97 244% | 89.9 219% | 88.7 215% | 56.8 101% | 45.5 61% | 31.3 11% | 49.9 77% |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | -1% | 241% | 204% | 196% | 126% | 56% | 42% | 97% | |
Room GPUs-only | 535 | 528 -1% | 1661 210% | 1773 231% | 1440 169% | 1175 120% | 782 46% | 803 50% | 1037 94% |
Sala GPUs-only | 935 | 924 -1% | 3468 271% | 2584 176% | 3020 223% | 2156 131% | 1554 66% | 1252 34% | 1864 99% |
ComputeMark v2.1 | -1% | 254% | 228% | 228% | 97% | 67% | 3% | 74% | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | 1049 | 1000 -5% | 2746 162% | 3322 217% | 2475 136% | 1931 84% | 1180 12% | 751 -28% | 1572 50% |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | 794 | 787 -1% | 2539 220% | 2002 152% | 2447 208% | 1092 38% | 1121 41% | 749 -6% | 968 22% |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | 585 | 594 2% | 2162 270% | 1994 241% | 2172 271% | 1277 118% | 1224 109% | 548 -6% | 1100 88% |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | 262 | 256 -2% | 991 278% | 963 268% | 911 248% | 596 127% | 479 83% | 321 23% | 555 112% |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | 262 | 261 0% | 1220 366% | 985 276% | 1039 297% | 597 128% | 536 105% | 378 44% | 554 111% |
1024x600 Normal, Score | 2953 | 2898 -2% | 9659 227% | 9266 214% | 9044 206% | 5493 86% | 4540 54% | 2747 -7% | 4749 61% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-1% | 246% /
250% | 217% /
222% | 213% /
219% | 108% /
104% | 61% /
64% | 19% /
13% | 83% /
79% |
Stress Test and Emissions
Our stress test can be quite a challenge for passively cooled cards. As mentioned before, they require proper cooling of the case in order to avoid overheating. The MSI performed exceptionally well in this regard, and its passive cooler worked very efficiently, even under intense load during the Time Spy and Sky Diver load tests. After a full hour of FurMark, the GPU never got warmer than 60 °C (~140 °F).
After disabling all case fans, the temperature rose to 67 °C (~153 °F), which is still far from its thermal limit and proof of the card’s very good overall cooling performance.
Overclocking
While the GPU’s low temperatures and massive passive cooler had us hoping for a decent overclocking potential, MSI does not allow adjustment of the card’s power target. Accordingly, we were only able to raise its core and VRAM clock speeds by 250 and 600 MHz, respectively. In 3DMark 11, the overclocked card’s score was 600 points higher than before; measurable, but once again far from perceptible.
Verdict
Our review unit was equipped with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM and a passive cooler. Accordingly, its performance was more than adequate for its intended use. Thanks to its gigantic passive cooler, the card not only remained completely quiet but also decently cool, even under load. It can be had for as little as $75, which, considering its performance is a fair price.
Those of you looking for a noiseless fanless graphics card for your entertainment center look no further. The GeForce GT 1030 is the perfect card for you and will not stand in the way of occasional casual gaming sessions either.
With a 30-W TDP, the GPU is highly efficient. The low-end Pascal chip even offers acceptable gaming performance for many games. Nevertheless, you should not expect too much from this graphics card, since it is after all made for the home entertainment sector. High resolution video playback is where this GPU really shines.