Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12800H vs Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Core i7-12800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12800H

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to3.7 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900H, the 12800H is lower clocked and also features  the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Performance

The average 12800H in our database matches the Ryzen 9 6900HS and the Core i9-11900H in multi-thread performance. Which is fairly impressive, as of mid 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 70 W, the ZBook Studio 16 G9 is among the fastest laptops built around the 12800H that we know of. It can be about 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i7-12800H is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12800HIntel Core i9-12900H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-HAlder Lake-H
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4800 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2014 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12800H
43.4 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
44.1 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.2     median: 103 (72%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 562     median: 564 (10%)     max: 734 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9777     avg: 14387     median: 15283 (14%)     max: 16597 Points
min: 7359     avg: 15137     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1796     avg: 1824     median: 1828 (78%)     max: 1859 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1822     median: 1858 (79%)     max: 1921 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 703     median: 706 (78%)     max: 714 Points
min: 624     avg: 705     median: 714.5 (79%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3741     avg: 5443     median: 5731 (14%)     max: 6433 Points
min: 2681     avg: 5705     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1566     avg: 2236     median: 2222 (14%)     max: 2697 Points
min: 1395     avg: 2468     median: 2586 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 242     avg: 260     median: 265 (80%)     max: 269 Points
min: 235     avg: 261.7     median: 264 (80%)     max: 277 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.08     avg: 23.3     median: 23.8 (31%)     max: 32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7952     avg: 8363     median: 8183.5 (49%)     max: 9498 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 24313     avg: 42701     median: 43671.5 (32%)     max: 60567 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178     avg: 65825     median: 69621 (48%)     max: 77409 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846     avg: 13148     median: 13199 (16%)     max: 13378 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 187.176     avg: 209.6     median: 202.7 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.421     avg: 4.2     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7620     avg: 8091     median: 7917 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44553     avg: 59950     median: 62100 (36%)     max: 68930 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60982     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5726     avg: 5835     median: 5820 (70%)     max: 5976 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5836     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 6289 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 67.5     avg: 101.6     median: 97.6 (34%)     max: 125.45 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 225     avg: 256.5     median: 262 (60%)     max: 286 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 16.3     median: 16.8 (30%)     max: 19.4 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 18.2 (32%)     max: 22.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 10.2     median: 10 (26%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
337 Seconds (4%)
min: 273     avg: 423.5     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 192     avg: 233.2     median: 222 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 231.8     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4442     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4715 sec
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10122     avg: 12879     median: 13394 (29%)     max: 14082 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.6 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 17.5     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.4     avg: 412.9     median: 402.8 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33640     avg: 51723     median: 53621 (47%)     max: 62706 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15130     avg: 21336     median: 22022 (60%)     max: 24746 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21309     median: 22326.5 (60%)     max: 26126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79353 Points (64%)
min: 70655     avg: 87027     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 71651     avg: 88896     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81857     avg: 89536     median: 88917 (75%)     max: 100472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12719     avg: 17648     median: 18989 (48%)     max: 19895 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17947     median: 19159 (48%)     max: 22123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21866     avg: 27059     median: 27907 (50%)     max: 29584 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25581     median: 26750 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9325     avg: 11508     median: 11786 (50%)     max: 13353 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12137 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1893     avg: 2279     median: 2269 (69%)     max: 2515 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9258     avg: 10114     median: 10229.5 (40%)     max: 11247 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1739     avg: 1790     median: 1771 (75%)     max: 1842 Points
min: 1631     avg: 1796     median: 1820 (77%)     max: 1892 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9607     avg: 11957     median: 12434 (22%)     max: 12940 Points
min: 8519     avg: 11993     median: 12256.5 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1686     median: 1694 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374     avg: 10522     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7191     avg: 7488     median: 7417.5 (74%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30682     avg: 36126     median: 36900 (41%)     max: 39648 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 510     avg: 520     median: 513 (1%)     max: 542 ms
min: 490     avg: 521     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
91965 Points (83%)
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (78%)     max: 92438 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
265 Points (76%)
min: 239     avg: 260.6     median: 264 (76%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 284     avg: 294.8     median: 294.5 (61%)     max: 306 Points
min: 263     avg: 297.6     median: 297 (62%)     max: 332 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1768     avg: 1800     median: 1790 (69%)     max: 1843 Points
min: 1515     avg: 1845     median: 1872 (72%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.7     avg: 108.7     median: 118 (20%)     max: 126 Watt
min: 52     avg: 108.3     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 84.3     avg: 135.4     median: 143 (26%)     max: 158 Watt
min: 74.6     avg: 126.6     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 28.3     median: 26 (17%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 14.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 19.8     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12800H → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 102% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 19:33:44

#0 checking url part for id 14045 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14045 +0.015s ... 0.052s

#7 got single benchmarks 14045 +0.019s ... 0.072s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.012s ... 0.083s

#9 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.083s ... 0.166s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.166s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.236s ... 0.402s

#12 return log +0.02s ... 0.423s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)