Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10300H vs Intel Core i7-13620H

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13620H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13620H

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H series (based on the Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.9 GHz (single-core boost, all-core boost up to 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the older i7-12650H, the 13620H offers higher clock speeds.

Performance

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the i7-13620H should be able to clearly best the old i7-12650H. Still, the faster i7 models of the 13th gen offer more e-Cores and therefore a clearly better multi-threaded performance.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the 12th gen.). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5GHz.

Power consumption

The i7-13620H is rated at a TDP of 55W (PL1, 115W PL2) and is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds compared to the 12th gen CPUs.

ModelIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Core i7-13620H
CodenameComet Lake-HRaptor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB864 KB
L2 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 16
6 x 4.9 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1440BGA1700
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTThread Director
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
29.7 pt (49%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13620H
38.7 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (38%)
min: 109     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (62%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
min: 691     avg: 758     median: 757.5 (14%)     max: 824 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
min: 10819     avg: 14472     median: 15247 (14%)     max: 15496 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
min: 1805     avg: 1842     median: 1846.5 (78%)     max: 1871 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (49%)     max: 470 Points
min: 693     avg: 704     median: 702.5 (77%)     max: 719 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
min: 4214     avg: 5505     median: 5727 (14%)     max: 5905 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
min: 1681     avg: 2246     median: 2315 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (52%)     max: 194 Points
min: 258     avg: 262.7     median: 263 (73%)     max: 269 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
27.1 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (51%)     max: 2.17 Points
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
10181 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
54809 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (23%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.2 s (3%)
1021 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
3.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4825 Points (8%)
8682 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
min: 45983     avg: 56867     median: 58483 (34%)     max: 62324 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (58%)     max: 4956 MIPS
min: 5742     avg: 5966     median: 5902.5 (70%)     max: 6326 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
53.3 fps (1%)
138.2 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
190.2 fps (5%)
345.4 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
min: 12.9     avg: 16.3     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (11%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
13.8 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
min: 353     avg: 405.8     median: 384.5 (5%)     max: 506 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
min: 215     avg: 234.2     median: 220.5 (2%)     max: 289 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
min: 0.4438     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.8 s (1%)
15.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
380 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75313 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (24%)     max: 10909 Points
min: 14557     avg: 20157     median: 20971 (52%)     max: 22258 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
min: 72358     avg: 88076     median: 91770 (75%)     max: 100099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
100899 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (51%)     max: 63995 Points
98837 Points (79%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
min: 13351     avg: 17139     median: 17901.5 (45%)     max: 19637 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
min: 19126     avg: 25548     median: 26217 (47%)     max: 29465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
min: 7713     avg: 10561     median: 11123.5 (47%)     max: 12228 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1599 Points (39%)
min: 2498     avg: 2568     median: 2592 (63%)     max: 2605 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
min: 9131     avg: 11687     median: 12557 (49%)     max: 13077 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1518 Points (48%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
5152 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (46%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 1785     avg: 1817     median: 1813 (69%)     max: 1865 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
min: 8357     avg: 10876     median: 11359.5 (20%)     max: 12223 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
1767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
11205 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
7977 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (17%)     max: 18807 Points
42882 Points (42%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
min: 508     avg: 515     median: 513 (1%)     max: 532 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (36%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 260     avg: 264.7     median: 264 (73%)     max: 270 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (38%)     max: 231 Points
min: 271     avg: 292.5     median: 287 (52%)     max: 319 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1493     avg: 1830     median: 1869 (70%)     max: 1986 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
min: 61.1     avg: 110.2     median: 116.5 (20%)     max: 135 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
min: 124.9     avg: 138.1     median: 128.8 (24%)     max: 170 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.1     avg: 18.5     median: 19.5 (13%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.3     avg: 15.6     median: 14.8 (18%)     max: 21.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt
min: 14.7     avg: 17.5     median: 18 (13%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13620H → 200% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 22:30:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14723 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759696249s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.022s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14723 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 14723 +0.016s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.111s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)