Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i5-12500H vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-12500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12500H

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and all 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compared to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 18 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12600H, the 12500H offers base clock for both clusters, a slower clocked iGPU and only "Essentials" vPro support.

Performance

The average 12500H in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, Core i7-12650H and also the Core i9-11900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. For something that's supposedly a mid-range chip, this kind of performance is just outrageously good, as of Q3 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Gigabyte G7 KE is among the fastest laptops built around the 12500H that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.3 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W. Its Base power consumption sits at 45 W and its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to exceed 95 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

Last but not he least, Intel Core i5-12500H is manufactured on Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in October 2024. The hybrid architecture APU has 8 CPU cores onboard (a mix of three Zen 5 and five Zen 5c cores) running at 2.0 to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. The AMD Secure Processor (which in a nutshell is an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard as well as are a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and up to LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support, including ECC RAM.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI PRO chip is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

We fully expect this PRO series processor to be 15% to 25% slower than the 10-core Ryzen AI 9 365 chip for Core Ultra 7 155U-like multi-thread benchmark scores. Of course, a lot depends on how high the power targets are which can differ vastly between designs.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs several differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this AMD iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 360 is supposed to have a low-term TDP power target of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 365Intel Core i5-12500HAMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
CodenameStrix Point (Zen 5)Alder Lake-HStrix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Alder Lake-PAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3602 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H « 1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 3652 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 « 2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5000 MHz1800 - 4500 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
Cores / Threads10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
12 / 168 / 16
3 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
5 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP54 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8BGA1744FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache1.1 MB
L2 Cache10 MB8 MB
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12500H
36.4 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
38.8 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.7     avg: 112.1     median: 113.5 (64%)     max: 116.3 Points
108.5 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 992.5 (18%)     max: 1112 Points
708 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11462     avg: 17784     median: 18698 (17%)     max: 20649 Points
min: 11330     avg: 13325     median: 13461 (13%)     max: 14686 Points
13794 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1942     avg: 1985     median: 1992 (84%)     max: 2001 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1677     median: 1685.5 (71%)     max: 1701 Points
1958 Points (82%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 758     avg: 780     median: 782 (85%)     max: 787 Points
min: 627     avg: 647     median: 652.5 (71%)     max: 656 Points
766 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5247     avg: 7126     median: 7303 (18%)     max: 8070 Points
min: 4687     avg: 5126     median: 5090.5 (12%)     max: 5640 Points
5398 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1950     avg: 2759     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 3075 Points
min: 2001     avg: 2142     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2283 Points
2023 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 195.7     avg: 287.2     median: 303 (84%)     max: 306 Points
min: 233     avg: 242.5     median: 242.5 (67%)     max: 250 Points
271 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
25.5 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
3.5 Points (83%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 Points
8410 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 Points
44438 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76704 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15443 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
302.8 s (4%)
287.9 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.7 s (1%)
6.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 Points
4389 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47754     avg: 65201     median: 69773 (40%)     max: 71722 MIPS
min: 44105     avg: 50901     median: 51984.5 (30%)     max: 54380 MIPS
52491 MIPS (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5790     avg: 5984     median: 6017 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
min: 5174     avg: 5360     median: 5377 (63%)     max: 5563 MIPS
5417 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
96.8 fps (32%)
123.3 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
258.7 fps (60%)
296.9 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 21.8     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 24.5 fps
min: 12     avg: 15.1     median: 15.3 (27%)     max: 16.6 fps
17.2 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
10.7 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 243     avg: 300.9     median: 270 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
min: 385     avg: 435.3     median: 426 (5%)     max: 520 Seconds
388 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 192.3     median: 175 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
min: 223     avg: 245.1     median: 238 (2%)     max: 288 Seconds
243 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4091     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
min: 0.4748     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.535 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (31%)     max: 15034 Points
min: 12791     avg: 13126     median: 13126 (28%)     max: 13461 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
415.6 s (2%)
424.1 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17153     avg: 19025     median: 18698 (46%)     max: 20777 Points
min: 15380     avg: 18894     median: 19689 (48%)     max: 20500 Points
15769 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61739 Points (50%)
min: 82429     avg: 85046     median: 85045.5 (69%)     max: 87662 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
84919 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
86520 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
min: 15451     avg: 16932     median: 17100 (43%)     max: 18190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19564     avg: 27580     median: 28875 (51%)     max: 29894 Points
min: 23099     avg: 24362     median: 24351.5 (43%)     max: 25450 Points
21341 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7753     avg: 10008     median: 10247 (43%)     max: 10783 Points
min: 8343     avg: 9856     median: 9989 (42%)     max: 11121 Points
8042 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2778     avg: 2832     median: 2815 (70%)     max: 2920 Points
min: 2239     avg: 2280     median: 2279.5 (57%)     max: 2320 Points
2699 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12627     avg: 14265     median: 14262 (55%)     max: 15137 Points
min: 8714     avg: 9892     median: 9891.5 (38%)     max: 11069 Points
12344 Points (48%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2125 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
8352 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2080     median: 2070 (81%)     max: 2104 Points
min: 1556     avg: 1642     median: 1636.5 (64%)     max: 1693 Points
1995 Points (78%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9599     avg: 12817     median: 13115 (23%)     max: 14182 Points
min: 7962     avg: 9862     median: 10272 (18%)     max: 10828 Points
10661 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1636 Points (7%)
1914 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10203 Points (32%)
10575 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8159 Points (81%)
8042 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43651 Points (44%)
40993 Points (41%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 430     avg: 440.5     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
min: 545     avg: 555     median: 554 (1%)     max: 565 ms
454 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 106359     avg: 112650     median: 110756 (81%)     max: 120835 Points
min: 83082     avg: 83286     median: 83229 (61%)     max: 83548 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 255     avg: 271.9     median: 265 (73%)     max: 330 Points
min: 214     avg: 238.4     median: 240 (66%)     max: 251 Points
254 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 317.2     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 336 Points
min: 246     avg: 270.7     median: 272 (49%)     max: 286 Points
300 Points (54%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1658     avg: 1768     median: 1742 (65%)     max: 1964 Points
min: 1668     avg: 1755     median: 1752 (66%)     max: 1824 Points
1676 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.9     avg: 77.8     median: 75.8 (13%)     max: 116.1 Watt
min: 59.5     avg: 103.2     median: 106 (18%)     max: 132.7 Watt
45.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.1     avg: 86.4     median: 83.2 (15%)     max: 113.2 Watt
min: 76.3     avg: 116     median: 126.5 (23%)     max: 134.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.47     avg: 7.2     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 9.7 Watt
min: 4.45     avg: 17.4     median: 17.5 (12%)     max: 30.6 Watt
5.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.86     avg: 8.6     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 11 Watt
min: 6.46     avg: 11.9     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 16 Watt
4.7 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 32.5     avg: 35.4     median: 34.3 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt
min: 15.7     avg: 19.8     median: 18 (13%)     max: 27.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12500H → 81% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 → 85% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 23:55:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14055 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18004 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755381310s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.012s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14055 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 14055 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18004 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#13 got single benchmarks 18004 +0.005s ... 0.056s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.073s ... 0.129s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.129s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)