Gigabyte G5 KF review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4060 for 969 euros
The G5 KF is a gaming laptop in the lower price segment – the 15.6-inch device will set you back roughly €969 (US$1,026). Though a Windows licence isn’t included in the price. The Gigabyte laptop is competing with the likes of the MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF, Intel NUC X15, Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 and Asus TUF A15 FA507.
The G5 KF is a follow-up to the G5 KE and shares the same physical design. You can thus refer to our G5 KE review for more information on the chassis, features, input devices and display.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News Writer (Romania based)
Details here
Comparison with possible competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Gigabyte G5 KF i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H i7-12700H, A730M | 2.2 kg | 26.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) |
Display - 144Hz FHD panel
The matt FHD display (manufactured by Chi Mei) has been carried over from the G5 KE. Though it has a good viewing angle, the 144Hz IPS panel isn’t up to standard when it comes to brightness and contrast. The display isn’t able to reproduce the usual colour spaces (sRGB, AdobeRG and DCI-P3). But at least it doesn’t exhibit PWM flicker at any brightness level. There are no other panel options available. The Asus TUF A15, Intel NUC X15 and Lenovo Slim 5 16APH8 are all kitted out with better displays.
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 297 cd/m²
Contrast: 874:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 4.74
ΔE Greyscale 5.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
44.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Gigabyte G5 KF Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 BOE NJ NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 47% | 50% | 58% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.2 | 42.3 -2% | 64.9 50% | 64.9 50% | 69.3 60% | 40.7 -6% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.3 | 62.6 -3% | 92.6 44% | 96.5 50% | 100 56% | 61 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.7 | 43.7 -2% | 66.3 48% | 66.6 49% | 70 57% | 42.1 -6% |
Response Times | -9% | 51% | -57% | 43% | -40% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25.1 ? | 22 ? 12% | 7.8 ? 69% | 30.4 ? -21% | 10.7 ? 57% | 26.64 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 14 ? -30% | 7.3 ? 32% | 20.8 ? -93% | 7.8 ? 28% | 18.65 ? -73% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 22% | 51% | 48% | 39% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 297 | 247 -17% | 365 23% | 288 -3% | 371.6 25% | 269 -9% |
Brightness | 275 | 234 -15% | 356 29% | 271 -1% | 343 25% | 248 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 89 5% | 86 1% | 91 7% | 84 -1% | 85 0% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.25 26% | 0.17 50% | 0.17 50% | 0.44 -29% | 0.5 -47% |
Contrast | 874 | 988 13% | 2147 146% | 1694 94% | 845 -3% | 538 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.23 | 3.78 39% | 3.51 44% | 1.9 70% | 1.52 76% | 4.54 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.93 | 6.42 69% | 6.37 70% | 3.3 84% | 2.68 87% | 17.28 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.74 | 3.94 17% | 1.88 60% | 0.9 81% | 0.33 93% | 3.34 30% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.92 | 2.16 64% | 3.83 35% | 2.7 54% | 1.2 80% | 3.8 36% |
Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.33 94% | 2.47 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6279 104% | 6906 94% | 7362 88% | 6535 99% | 6503 100% | 7408 88% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
13% | 50% /
50% | 14% /
34% | 47% /
44% | -15% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.9 ms rise | |
↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
25.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.7 ms rise | |
↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Alder Lake meets Ada Lovelace
With the G5 KF, Gigabyte has a relatively affordable FHD gaming laptop in their product lineup. The laptop sports a Core i5-12500H and GeForce RTX 4060 and can be had for slightly under €1,000 (US$1,059). The company also offers less expensive models with the RTX 4050 (G5 MF) or RTX 3050 (G5 GE).
Test conditions
The G5 offers four performance modes specified by the manufacturer (see table). You can switch between them using the Control Center software. We used “Performance mode” for our benchmarks and “Energy-saving mode” for the battery life tests.
Performance mode | Entertainment mode | Energy-saving mode | Silent mode | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Limit 1 (HWInfo) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Power Limit 2 (HWInfo) | 125 Watt | 115 Watt | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
Processor
The 12 CPU cores on the Core i5-12500H (4 P-cores, 8 E-cores) can reach max frequencies of 4.5 GHz (P) and 3.3 GHz (E). Under sustained multi-thread loading (i.e. CB15 in a loop), the clock speed dropped slightly between the first and the second run and stayed at a relatively constant level after that.
The benchmark results are on par with what we’ve seen from the CPU on average (when plugged in). On battery power, the more relevant single-thread score in CB15 (159 points) saw a smaller decrease than the multi-thread score (741 point).
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6851 - 13947, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (29874 - 68178, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (2287 - 3337, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (77935 - 80703, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6590 - 7431, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (18252 - 34041, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (50298 - 111567, n=9) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (746 - 924, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (3848 - 7405, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (13686 - 43813, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
System performance
The system runs smoothly and packs enough power to handle demanding applications, such rendering and gaming. The transfer rates of the memory are fairly typical for DDR4-3200 RAM.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=162, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6318 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23850 - 66598, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (24879 - 68013, n=9) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23543 - 58797, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (83.8 - 114.7, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latency
Our standardised latency monitor test (web browsing, 4K video playback and Prime95 high load) revealed some issues. The system doesn’t appear to be suitable for real-time video and audio processing. Hopefully, this can be improved with future software updates.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
Gigabyte has equipped the G5 with a 512 GB SSD (PCIe 4.0, M2. 2280) from SSSTC that delivers great data transfer speeds. That said, it is prone to performance drops caused by thermal throttling. The notebook also has a PCIe 3.0 slot to accommodate a second M.2 2280 SSD.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average SSSTC CA6-8D512 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |