Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs Intel Core i5-12500H

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

Intel Core i5-12500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12500H

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and all 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compared to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 18 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12600H, the 12500H offers base clock for both clusters, a slower clocked iGPU and only "Essentials" vPro support.

Performance

The average 12500H in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, Core i7-12650H and also the Core i9-11900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. For something that's supposedly a mid-range chip, this kind of performance is just outrageously good, as of Q3 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Gigabyte G7 KE is among the fastest laptops built around the 12500H that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.3 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W. Its Base power consumption sits at 45 W and its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to exceed 95 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

Last but not he least, Intel Core i5-12500H is manufactured on Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800UIntel Core i5-12500H
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Alder Lake-H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H « 1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4200 MHz1800 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB10 MB
L3 Cache8 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 16
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
30.1 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12500H
36.4 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
min: 11330     avg: 13325     median: 13461 (13%)     max: 14686 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (52%)     max: 1240 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1677     median: 1685.5 (71%)     max: 1701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (52%)     max: 488 Points
min: 627     avg: 647     median: 652.5 (71%)     max: 656 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
min: 4687     avg: 5126     median: 5090.5 (12%)     max: 5640 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
min: 2001     avg: 2142     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2283 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (51%)     max: 187 Points
min: 233     avg: 242.5     median: 242.5 (67%)     max: 250 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
min: 44105     avg: 50901     median: 51984.5 (30%)     max: 54380 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (52%)     max: 4603 MIPS
min: 5174     avg: 5360     median: 5377 (63%)     max: 5563 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
min: 12     avg: 15.1     median: 15.3 (27%)     max: 16.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 385     avg: 435.3     median: 426 (5%)     max: 520 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
min: 223     avg: 245.1     median: 238 (2%)     max: 288 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
min: 0.4748     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.535 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
min: 12791     avg: 13126     median: 13126 (28%)     max: 13461 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (39%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (30%)     max: 12541 Points
min: 15380     avg: 18894     median: 19689 (48%)     max: 20500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58600 Points (48%)
min: 82429     avg: 85046     median: 85045.5 (69%)     max: 87662 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58705 Points (48%)
84919 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67233 Points (54%)
86520 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
min: 15451     avg: 16932     median: 17100 (43%)     max: 18190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
min: 23099     avg: 24362     median: 24351.5 (43%)     max: 25450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
min: 8343     avg: 9856     median: 9989 (42%)     max: 11121 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2239     avg: 2280     median: 2279.5 (55%)     max: 2320 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 8714     avg: 9892     median: 9891.5 (38%)     max: 11069 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2125 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
8352 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (44%)     max: 1192 Points
min: 1556     avg: 1642     median: 1636.5 (62%)     max: 1693 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
min: 7962     avg: 9862     median: 10272 (18%)     max: 10828 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1162 Points (5%)
1636 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7298 Points (23%)
10203 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (27%)     max: 27407 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
min: 545     avg: 555     median: 554 (1%)     max: 565 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36619 Points (27%)
min: 83082     avg: 83286     median: 83229 (61%)     max: 83548 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 214     avg: 238.4     median: 240 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (37%)     max: 219 Points
min: 246     avg: 270.7     median: 272 (49%)     max: 286 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1668     avg: 1755     median: 1752 (66%)     max: 1824 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
min: 59.5     avg: 103.2     median: 106 (18%)     max: 132.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
min: 76.3     avg: 116     median: 126.5 (23%)     max: 134.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.45     avg: 17.4     median: 17.5 (12%)     max: 30.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.46     avg: 11.9     median: 12.3 (15%)     max: 16 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
min: 15.7     avg: 19.8     median: 18 (13%)     max: 27.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12500H → 144% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 05:47:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14055 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759636023s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14055 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14055 +0.017s ... 0.037s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)