Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HIntel Xeon E-2276M
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Coffee Lake
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Coffee Lake-H
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
34.1 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
484 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (59%)     max: 201 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
5214 MIPS (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (34%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
1303 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
24150 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
56114 Points (50%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
220 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 152% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 16:52:09

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.021s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.061s ... 0.118s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.019s ... 0.137s

#9 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.017s ... 0.153s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.153s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.291s ... 0.444s

#12 return log +0.028s ... 0.472s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)