NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti . The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The GPU features 1024 shaders, 64 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs. The 4 GB GDDR5 memory is connected with a 128-bit memory interface and clocked at 2000 MHz. At a TGP of 60W, the clock speeds are specified from 1575 MHz (base) to 1785 MHz (boost).
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000 ), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M . The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Quadro M Series Codename N19P-Q3 Architecture Turing Maxwell Pipelines 1024 - unified 1024 - unified Core Speed 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz 1050 MHz Memory Speed 8000 MHz 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 60 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 4.7 Billion 5.2 Billion technology 12 nm 28 nm Notebook Size medium sized large Date of Announcement 27.05.2019 02.10.2015 Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M3000M
3 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 19732 avg: 21408 median: 21407.5 (23%) max: 23083 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38539 avg: 44603 median: 44602.5 (12%) max: 50666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5835 avg: 5972 median: 5971.5 (11%) max: 6108 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6415 avg: 6537 median: 6536.5 (7%) max: 6658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 42957 avg: 84310 median: 84309.5 (10%) max: 125662 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150 avg: 13271 median: 13271 (18%) max: 13392 Points
min: 8493 avg: 8540 median: 8539.5 (12%) max: 8586 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370 avg: 13524 median: 13523.5 (12%) max: 13677 Points
min: 8264 avg: 8289 median: 8288.5 (7%) max: 8313 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
27405 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
27921 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 26746 avg: 27321 median: 27320.5 (36%) max: 27895 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 37.8 avg: 38.2 median: 38.2 (13%) max: 38.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 79.3 avg: 80 median: 80 (26%) max: 80.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (27%) max: 76.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 112.7 avg: 114.5 median: 114.5 (22%) max: 116.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 49.91 avg: 55.8 median: 50 (30%) max: 67.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 41.16 avg: 50.2 median: 53 (30%) max: 56.3 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 35.28 avg: 45.1 median: 48 (37%) max: 52 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.08 avg: 19.5 median: 20 (24%) max: 22.46 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 57 avg: 66.9 median: 57.8 (44%) max: 86 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 35.34 avg: 47.4 median: 51.9 (56%) max: 55 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 59 avg: 59.2 median: 59.1 (28%) max: 59.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 43.12 avg: 49.5 median: 52 (27%) max: 53.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 52.3 avg: 76.4 median: 84.8 (21%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 39.84 avg: 52.5 median: 52 (8%) max: 65.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 37 avg: 40.2 median: 39.8 (9%) max: 43.81 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 23.08 avg: 44.8 median: 50.4 (14%) max: 61 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.17 avg: 57.7 median: 64.8 (26%) max: 66 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 45.24 avg: 66.7 median: 77 (13%) max: 77.9 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (19%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.46 avg: 20.6 median: 22 (6%) max: 22.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.68 avg: 4.8 median: 4.8 (4%) max: 4.85 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4455 avg: 5650 median: 5649.5 (4%) max: 6844 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 42.4 avg: 71.1 median: 71.1 (25%) max: 99.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 68 avg: 92.1 median: 92.1 (5%) max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
249.9 fps (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1258 avg: 1273 median: 1273 (6%) max: 1288 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2234 avg: 2261 median: 2261 (4%) max: 2288 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4737 Points (5%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 100% n=9 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 72% n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro M3000M:
179 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
123 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
58 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
21 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
120 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
94 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
87 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
69 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
45 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
200 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
125 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
68 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
54 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
380 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
186 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
151 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
81 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
349 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
271 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
217 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
40 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
57 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
25 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 114.9 69.9 40.2 33.4 Rainbow Six Siege 146.8 76.8 54.5 23.8 Just Cause 3 85.6 50.4 43.7 17.8 Star Wars Battlefront 124.5 59.4 50.9 17.8 Anno 2205 179 123 58 21 The Witcher 3 122.7 74 42 22 14.1 Dirt Rally 108.6 89.6 53.6 39.2 GTA V 136.1 69.1 29.7 35.3 F1 2014 122 122 122 120 Ryse: Son of Rome 94 87 69 45 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 200 125 68 54 GRID: Autosport 380 186 151 81 Thief 88.6 77.4 43.1 Total War: Rome II 349 271 217 40 Company of Heroes 2 66 66 57 25 Metro: Last Light 124.5 82.9 44.6 BioShock Infinite 226.3 179 165 70 Tomb Raider 255.1 185 82.1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 7 7 11 6 7 5 4 10 3 1 4 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 28. 21:30:29
#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6507 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.095s ... 0.096s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.096s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.096s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.024s ... 0.121s
#8 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.014s ... 0.134s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6507 +0.016s ... 0.15s
#10 got single benchmarks 6507 +0.011s ... 0.162s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.163s ... 0.325s
#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.325s
#14 Got 76 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.332s
#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.332s
#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.345s
#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.041s ... 0.385s
#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.385s
#19 return log +0.04s ... 0.426s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)