Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA T600

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA T600

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T600

The Nvidia T600 Desktop GPU is a professional graphics card for workstations that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). The desktop version only offers 640 of the 1024 cores and therefore also less than the T600 mobile (896 CUDA cores). The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory connected with a 128 bit bus (up to 160 GB/s bandwidth). The T600 supports certified drivers (former Quadro line) for professional applications like CAD, 3D modelling, DCC, medicine, or visualization applications.

The maximum power consumption of the card is rated at 40W.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA T600
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 compare 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN12E-Q5
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Pipelines384 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz
Memory Speed1300 MHz10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5 ECCGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption100 Watt40 Watt
Transistors3 Billion4.7 Billion
technology40 nm12 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
TMUs40
ROPs32
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
Die Size 200 mm²
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
2.5 pt (7%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T600 +
6284 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
6552 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
182459 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T600 +
2496 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
2195 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
304731 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
152912 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T600 +
31922 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
40917 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (4%)     max: 3100 Points
310%
T600 +
9497 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2693 Points (2%)
323%
T600 +
8694 Points (7%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600
2654%
T600 +
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
11047 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600
275%
T600 +
30400 Points (17%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24769 Points (27%)
187%
T600 +
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark 06
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (25%)     max: 20979 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
231%
T600 +
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T600 +
32.7 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (23%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (23%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (35%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 7.99     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 53.6     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 33.89     avg: 38.2     median: 38.1 (20%)     max: 42.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
100%
1 T600 +
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
100%
1 T600 +
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
100%
1 T600 +
35.3 fps (6%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
100%
1 T600 +
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
100%
1 T600 +
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
100%
1 T600 +
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
100%
1 T600 +
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
100%
1 T600 +
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
100%
1 T600 +
80 fps (12%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
100%
1 T600 +
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
100%
1 T600 +
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
100%
1 T600 +
34.9 fps (6%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
100%
1 T600 +
35.7 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
100%
1 T600 +
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
100%
1 T600 +
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
100%
1 T600 +
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
100%
1 T600 +
79.9 fps (13%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
100%
1 T600 +
16.9 fps (4%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
100%
1 T600 +
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
4.5 fps (3%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
46.1 fps (7%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
32.3 fps (14%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T600 +
19.4 fps (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600
103%
T600 +
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.1     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (22%)     max: 69.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
154%
T600 +
104.1 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T600 +
1121 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T600 +
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T600 +
4825 Points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
76.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
83.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
100%
1 T600 +
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 530% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
93.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
44.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
6.3  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
171.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
63.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
40.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
29.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
15.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
T600:
150.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
73.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
55.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
27  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
14.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
107.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
13.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
74.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.4  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
14.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
8.5  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
174.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
64.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
51.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
44.8  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
17.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
95  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
46  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
39  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
12  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
132.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
107  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
95.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
40.8  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
70.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
25.1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
17.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
10  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
162.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
148.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
120.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
110.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
T600:
139.1  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
82.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
47.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
27.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
16.1  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T600:
181.5  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
175.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
80.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
25  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
35.3  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
81.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
28.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
high 1600x900
100%
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA T600
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Far Cry 693.544.621.36.33
F1 2021171.978.863.740.229.115.7
F1 2020150.473.155.538.62714.5
Borderlands 3107.64226.719.913.45.54
Metro Exodus74.6342419.414.88.47
Strange Brigade174.464.951.444.831.917.9
Far Cry 5954642392612
X-Plane 11.11132.810795.940.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark70.734.925.117.89.98
Dota 2 Reborn162.8148.6120.7110.539.6
The Witcher 3139.182.847.527.216.1
GTA V181.5175.680.338.226.625
NVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA T600
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
7

5
5
2
4
4
3
1
4
5
1
7
1

9
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 14. 20:46:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760467603s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:19:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0.017s ... 0.066s

#9 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.004s ... 0.07s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.004s ... 0.074s

#11 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.004s ... 0.078s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.107s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.107s

#15 Got 89 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.11s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.11s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.112s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.12s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.122s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)