Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP1

The ARM Mali-G57 MP1 or MC1 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the UniSoc T616 and uses 1 clusters (hence the MC1/MP1 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
ARM Mali-G57 MP1Qualcomm Adreno 642
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines1 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
technology7 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G57 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T6198 x 1800 MHz850 MHz? MHz
UNISOC T6168 x 1800 MHz750 MHz? MHz
UNISOC T6068 x 1600 MHz650 MHz? MHz
Allwinner A5238 x 480 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 850 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1414     avg: 1553     median: 1506.5 (7%)     max: 1710 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1255     avg: 1392     median: 1378.5 (3%)     max: 1518 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 958     avg: 1004     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1109 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 814     avg: 855     median: 829 (2%)     max: 942 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 392     avg: 431.9     median: 422 (0%)     max: 500 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 99     avg: 114.1     median: 111 (0%)     max: 136 Points
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.8     avg: 1.2     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 6.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.85     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.6 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.9     avg: 5.6     median: 5.5 (0%)     max: 7.1 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.9     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 6.9 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.1     avg: 9.1     median: 9 (0%)     max: 10 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 14.7     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP1
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 20     avg: 23.3     median: 22 (0%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 22069     avg: 31036     median: 31809 (4%)     max: 39165 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 9.58     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (0%)     max: 11.4 fps
48 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 443     avg: 460.8     median: 450 (0%)     max: 512 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 433     avg: 469.6     median: 448 (0%)     max: 529 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8097     avg: 13148     median: 13735 (14%)     max: 17613 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 11168     avg: 12945     median: 11902 (21%)     max: 15764 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.642     avg: 3.9     median: 3.1 (1%)     max: 6.79 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 654% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
58  fps
52%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
30  fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
med.
Adreno 642:
59  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
26  fps
231%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 171%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 210%

ARM Mali-G57 MP1lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet58
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends26
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1




1
2
1









Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 07:24:26

#0 checking url part for id 11103 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.145s ... 0.147s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.147s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.147s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11103 +0.044s ... 0.191s

#8 got single benchmarks 11103 +0.102s ... 0.292s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.294s

#10 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.009s ... 0.303s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.303s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.118s ... 0.422s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.422s

#14 Got 13 rows for game benchmarks. +0.054s ... 0.476s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.476s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.478s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.488s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.488s

#19 return log +0.087s ... 0.574s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)