Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9300H vs Intel Core i7-8665U

Intel Core i5-9300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9300H

The Intel Core i5-9300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 Refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz (4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8300H from 2018, the 9300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz CPU, +50 MHz GPU).

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-9300H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H/9750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-9300H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-8665U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8665U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro enabled WHL-U processors. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8665U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,8 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 should support Thermal Velocity Boost (like the Core i7-8565U, the predecessor).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8665U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Due to the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost, the 8665U should outperform the i7-8565U (see for benchmarks).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i5-9300HIntel Core i7-8665U
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Core i7
CodenameCoffee Lake-HWhiskey Lake-U
Series: Core i7 Whiskey Lake-U
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8665U « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$250 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9300H
30.2 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8665U
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2729 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
988 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 398     avg: 415.2     median: 419 (47%)     max: 427 Points
min: 379     avg: 427     median: 427 (47%)     max: 472 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1530     avg: 1727     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 1877 Points
min: 1050     avg: 1329     median: 1346 (3%)     max: 1530 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 717     avg: 784     median: 790 (5%)     max: 850 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172 (52%)     max: 176 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.9 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6421     avg: 6561     median: 6572 (40%)     max: 6677 Points
min: 6716     avg: 6872     median: 6872 (42%)     max: 7028 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 21798     avg: 24198     median: 24623 (18%)     max: 25656 Points
min: 16602     avg: 18427     median: 18426.5 (13%)     max: 20251 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
429.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5663 Points (9%)
3418 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20736     avg: 22008     median: 22133 (13%)     max: 23155 MIPS
min: 14665     avg: 18146     median: 18298 (11%)     max: 20023 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4542     avg: 4592     median: 4609 (55%)     max: 4626 MIPS
min: 4338     avg: 4684     median: 4705.5 (56%)     max: 4988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.4 fps (17%)
32 fps (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
193.7 fps (45%)
139 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.7     avg: 6.1     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.5 fps
min: 3.82     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 5.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 588     avg: 611     median: 602 (4%)     max: 643 Seconds
min: 716     avg: 801     median: 754.5 (5%)     max: 978 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7787     avg: 8354     median: 8107 (17%)     max: 9169 Points
min: 6202     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (14%)     max: 6528 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.1 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.3 s (1%)
19 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
496 s (2%)
521 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26995 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7499     avg: 8987     median: 9107 (25%)     max: 10557 Points
min: 6266     avg: 7143     median: 6758 (18%)     max: 8676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 52412     avg: 55875     median: 56000 (46%)     max: 58466 Points
56356 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49250     avg: 54277     median: 54947 (45%)     max: 58074 Points
56510 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 58114     avg: 58963     median: 58413 (49%)     max: 61541 Points
min: 54189     avg: 59812     median: 60829 (51%)     max: 63399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5356     avg: 7678     median: 7828.5 (20%)     max: 8903 Points
min: 5234     avg: 6225     median: 5948 (15%)     max: 7398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9387     avg: 11376     median: 11698 (21%)     max: 12349 Points
min: 6860     avg: 8356     median: 8188 (15%)     max: 10574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3165     avg: 4074     median: 4189 (18%)     max: 4861 Points
min: 2638     avg: 2872     median: 2723 (11%)     max: 3405 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1039 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2671 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1095     avg: 1118     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1137 Points
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3697     avg: 4014     median: 4146 (13%)     max: 4200 Points
3453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4704     avg: 4898     median: 4901 (49%)     max: 5089 Points
min: 4686     avg: 5236     median: 5342.5 (53%)     max: 5574 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14853     avg: 16246     median: 16541 (18%)     max: 17684 Points
min: 11206     avg: 15544     median: 16347 (18%)     max: 18275 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5266 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16911 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14195     avg: 15338     median: 15527.5 (28%)     max: 16101 Points
14277 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3596     avg: 3854     median: 3854.5 (75%)     max: 4109 Points
3887 Points (76%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1079     avg: 1138     median: 1108.5 (1%)     max: 1349 ms
min: 1016     avg: 1072     median: 1067.5 (1%)     max: 1136 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86.6 ms (1%)
235 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22225     avg: 32344     median: 33646 (30%)     max: 34957 Points
min: 30142     avg: 33976     median: 34548 (31%)     max: 36667 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
222 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
27.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300H → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8665U → 87% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 14:39:12

#0 checking url part for id 11356 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11328 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11356 +0.017s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 11356 +0.06s ... 0.107s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11328 +0.012s ... 0.119s

#9 got single benchmarks 11328 +0.024s ... 0.143s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.272s ... 0.415s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.44s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)