Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP2

The ARM Mali-G57 MP2 (or MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2021 in the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and uses 2 clusters (hence the MC2/MP2 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP2 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 618.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2Valhall
ArchitectureRDNA 2Bifrost
Pipelines192 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
technology4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek MT8188J8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8108 x 2000 MHz? MHz1068 MHz
Mediatek Dimensity 64008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 12 more
min. - max.? MHz680 - 1068 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 1440     avg: 3547     median: 3598 (16%)     max: 3969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 1285     avg: 3603     median: 3648 (8%)     max: 4075 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 969     avg: 2562     median: 2551.5 (11%)     max: 3489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 825     avg: 2425     median: 2391 (6%)     max: 3908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 1424     avg: 3373     median: 3449 (31%)     max: 3808 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 1277     avg: 3432     median: 3482 (21%)     max: 3883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 963     avg: 2485     median: 2524 (12%)     max: 2791 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 823     avg: 2332     median: 2356 (8%)     max: 2655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 1003     avg: 1187     median: 1207 (1%)     max: 1357 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 309     avg: 350.4     median: 332 (0%)     max: 1073 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 1.9     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 6.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 5.2     avg: 15.2     median: 15 (1%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 14.9     median: 15 (1%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 8.6     avg: 24     median: 25 (1%)     max: 43 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 14     avg: 38.6     median: 40 (2%)     max: 70 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP2
min: 23     avg: 60.2     median: 63 (1%)     max: 69 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 0     avg: 66294     median: 60858 (6%)     max: 91922 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
min: 22017     avg: 61836     median: 65311.5 (5%)     max: 68889 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 22.5     avg: 26.4     median: 27 (1%)     max: 29.57 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 1179     avg: 1301     median: 1292 (0%)     max: 1476 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 1133     avg: 1296     median: 1290 (0%)     max: 1475 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13388     avg: 20302     median: 19268 (7%)     max: 26779 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 10582     avg: 20407     median: 19716 (33%)     max: 30301 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 1.077     avg: 3.4     median: 3 (1%)     max: 8.13 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 20% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP2:
29 29.5 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP2:
29.5 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP2:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
66%
Mali-G57 MP2:
26 32.2 35.4 37 39.2 43.1 43.1 43.3 55 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
50%
Mali-G57 MP2:
29.7  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
41%
Mali-G57 MP2:
17 20.7 22 23.2 23.5 23.7 26.6 29.8 31.1 ~ 24 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
76%
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 30 30 30 59 59 59 60 60 61 82 ~ 51 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
89%
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 37.4 37.7 37.9 39 39.3 39.4 39.5 39.8 39.8 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
101%
Mali-G57 MP2:
39.7 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
94%
Mali-G57 MP2:
28.4 29 29.1 29.3 29.4 29.6 29.8 29.9 29.9 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP2:
39 90 ~ 65 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 57.4 ~ 44 fps
high
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 54.3 ~ 42 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G57 MP2:
60 60 60 89 ~ 67 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 74%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Samsung Xclipse 920ARM Mali-G57 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift6060
Genshin Impact59.559.358.23929.724
Armajet6751
PUBG Mobile4439.532394030
Dead Trigger 265
Asphalt 9: Legends4442
Subway Surfers67
Samsung Xclipse 920ARM Mali-G57 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

1
1


3
2
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 16:31:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10691 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753713112s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:18:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.015s ... 0.046s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.052s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10691 +0s ... 0.052s

#11 got single benchmarks 10691 +0.075s ... 0.127s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.133s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.133s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.134s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.135s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.148s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.148s

#19 Got 118 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.166s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.166s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.166s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.17s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.17s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.17s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)