Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Galaxy M15 5G smartphone review – AMOLED, a wide-angle camera and a huge battery for under US$200

Disco ball and long-distance runner. The Samsung Galaxy M15 5G is an affordable mid-range smartphone with a large battery capacity and an AMOLED screen that can exclusively be purchased online. Does it offer enough to set itself apart from other inexpensive phones?
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 160.1 x 76.8 ( = 0.37 x 6.3 x 3.02 in)
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.781W/​kg Head, 1.191W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
217 g ( = 7.65 oz / 0.48 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
Best Price
72 %v8
07/2024
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
217 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
80.1 %v7 (old)
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
75.8 %v8
06/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2
174.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.8 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Motorola Moto G24
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.56"1612x720
77 %v7 (old)
05/2024
HMD Pulse Pro
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
196 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.65"1612x720

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case and connectivity – NFC included

Samsung's Galaxy M series is exclusively available online and it seems to have been neglected a little by the manufacturer as on some Samsung sites, such as in the US, the latest devices aren't even listed. You can at least order them from various other online retailers and they are certainly worth taking a look at—this includes the Galaxy M 15 5G which we will be discussing today. If you are expecting a carbon copy of the Galaxy A15 5G, then you've got the wrong idea—even if there are, of course, some similarities.

The phone features the exact same width and length, whereas the Samsung Galaxy M15 5G is a little thicker because it is fitted with a larger battery. This also adds a little bit of extra weight—at 217 grams, this is the heaviest phone within the comparison field. Even so, it still feels comfortable to hold.

Its edges are nicely rounded and its design looks great. You can get the back and frame in the colors light blue, dark blue and gray. The back is smooth but there is a pattern underneath the transparent top layer that refracts the light and is reminiscent of a disco ball.

The case isn't protected against water and dust. Still, it has been constructed well, you can't twist it using a normal amount of force and it doesn't make any creaking noises. You can, however, feel the material transition between the back and the frame ever so slightly

There are two versions of the phone available: one with 4 GB RAM and 128 GB storage and another with 6 GB RAM. NFC is on board, which lets you use the smartphone for mobile payment processes. If you enjoy using analogue headphones, then you can look forward to its 3.5-mm jack.

Unfortunately, it doesn't support eSIMs and if you'd like to insert a microSD card, then you'll have to give up one of the two SIM card slots. The microSD card reader achieved class-average speeds in our test using the Angelbird V60 as a reference card. Data transfers are therefore possible at a decent speed.

Size comparison

163.2 mm / 6.43 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 196 g0.4321 lbs163.5 mm / 6.44 in 74.5 mm / 2.93 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 181 g0.399 lbs160.1 mm / 6.3 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 9.3 mm / 0.3661 in 217 g0.4784 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 174.5 g0.3847 lbs160.1 mm / 6.3 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 200 g0.4409 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
48.7 MB/s +30%
HMD Pulse Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
38.5 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
37.4 MB/s
Motorola Moto G24
  (Angelbird V60)
36.9 MB/s -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=87, last 2 years)
28.7 MB/s -23%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.5 (27.2-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (26.3-44.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.2 (26.4-48.9)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (22.9-43.6)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (27.3-46.6)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø72.6 (44.3-77.8)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.1 (32-79.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø66.2 (29.9-74.6)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.5 (33-81.7)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.4 (37-83.3)

Communication, software, sustainability and operation

The Samsung Galaxy M15 5G comes with WiFi 5 and during our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, it achieved very stable data throughput rates that are usual for the technology: We noted values around 350 MBit/s. Although this isn't quite enough to make use of a gigabit internet line, you can still transfer data pretty quickly.

The Galaxy M15 is a 5G phone and it also supports quite a few frequencies of the fastest current mobile communications standard. This means you should be able to connect to the 5G or 4G network in many countries. However, the Galaxy M15 is not a true world phone, so you should research this before you travel if you want to use mobile internet locally.

Samsung's OneUI 6.1 is preinstalled as an operating system, which is based on Android 14. The manufacturer has taken its own route in many areas, so users used to stock Android may take a while to get used to it. All-in-all, the operating system is super modern and easy to use. We like that the manufacturer has promised 4 years of new operating system versions and up to 5 years of security patches. This also had a positive effect on our sustainability rating.

Speaking of sustainability: Samsung states that the CO2 equivalents generated during the phone's production are 33.9 kg, which is a relatively low and, as a result, good value. As no charger is included, the packaging is smaller and lighter, so fewer emissions are produced during transportation. The box is printed using soy ink and Samsung no longer uses plastic for its packaging.

Thanks to its 90 Hz screen, the phone responds very quickly to inputs and the touchscreen is very sensitive right into the corners and along the edges. If you want to unlock your smartphone using your fingerprint, then you need to place your finger on the standby button, as this is where the sensor is hidden. The phone is unlocked very quickly and reliably once prints have been saved. It can also be unlocked using facial recognition, which works just as reliably. In dark environments, the brightness of the screen is usually sufficient to enable recognition.

Networking
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 273) MBit/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 290) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
355 (min: 299) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
367 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
352 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
319 (min: 294) MBit/s ∼87%
HMD Pulse Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
352 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
319 (min: 238) MBit/s ∼87%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (273-358)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (348-394)

Cameras – Even with a wide-angle lens

Photo taken using front-facing camera
Photo taken using front-facing camera

Our test device's camera system has been adopted from the Galaxy A15 5G. This isn't a bad choice, as users receive a wide-angle camera, which is quite rare for phones within this price range. Although it only features a resolution of 5 megapixels and doesn't take the sharpest photos, it still massively expands the camera system's flexibility. 

Its main camera has a 50-megapixel resolution although by standard, it only takes 12.5-megapixel photos but with a higher light yield. If you would like to make use of the lens' full resolution, then you can select a special mode via the camera software. The photo of the plant looks quite good, whereas the photo of our surroundings has a slight blue tinge. The overall level of detail is average. In low-light conditions, the main camera lightens photos well, but light sources are often overexposed in pictures.

You can record videos in 1080p and at 30 fps using the main camera. This is common in this price range, but the resulting videos look a little jerky, especially if there are fast movements. The lighting adjustment and autofocus are sometimes a little slow. 

The third camera is a macro lens with a very low resolution. It is suitable for snapshots, but you shouldn't enlarge the images too much, as details are then only displayed roughly.

There is a 13-megapixel selfie camera on the front of the phone. It takes quite decent pictures. However, you shouldn't zoom in on these photos too much and there is a lack of detail in darker areas.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera
ColorChecker
5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M15 5G: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.84 - max: 11.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.7 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
54 ∆E
37 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M15 5G: 47.44 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.34 ∆E

Display – AMOLED for the masses

Thanks to Xiaomi and Samsung, OLED displays can now also be found in the relatively cheap smartphone classes. The Galaxy M15 5G is no exception to this, but its 6.5-inch AMOLED display is a little smaller than on phones made by other manufacturers. During our test, we measured a maximum brightness of 680 cd/m² when depicting a full white screen. When showing smaller areas, we noted up to 768 cd/m², which about corresponds to the maximum value indicated by the manufacturer 

It is a 90-Hz display which can be throttled to 60 Hz if lower power consumption is required—but fewer frames per second are not possible. During our measurements with the spectral photometer and the CalMAN software, we noted a relatively precise color reproduction and differences compared to the color space's reference value can't be seen by the naked eye.

We measured PWM flickering at about 360 Hz with an amplitude of approximately 15 %. As a result, you should try out the display before purchasing the device if you have reacted sensitively to flickering displays in the past.

682
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 683 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 679 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 678 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
141.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.466
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G24
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
HMD Pulse Pro
IPS, 1612x720, 6.7"
Response Times
26%
28%
-312%
-373%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.8 ?(1.5, 12.3)
1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)
88%
1.13 ?(0.57, 0.56)
92%
36 ?(19.9, 16.1)
-161%
35.7 ?(18.8, 16.9)
-159%
Response Time Black / White *
3.8 ?(1.6, 2.2)
1.3 ?(0.6, 0.7)
66%
1.55 ?(0.9, 0.65)
59%
21.4 ?(13, 8.4)
-463%
26.1 ?(12.7, 13.4)
-587%
PWM Frequency
359
90
-75%
120 ?(100)
-67%
Screen
5%
29%
-67%
-84%
Brightness middle
678
705
4%
958
41%
521
-23%
501
-26%
Brightness
679
701
3%
965
42%
510
-25%
470
-31%
Brightness Distribution
99
96
-3%
83
-16%
93
-6%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.39
0.17
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.96
1.88
4%
1.43
27%
4.83
-146%
5.21
-166%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.61
4.57
-27%
2.51
30%
7.71
-114%
8.79
-143%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.5
46%
1.4
50%
5.3
-89%
6.3
-125%
Gamma
2.466 89%
2.116 104%
2.33 94%
2.111 104%
2.297 96%
CCT
6955 93%
6501 100%
6476 100%
7021 93%
8524 76%
Contrast
1336
2947
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 12%
29% / 29%
-190% / -128%
-229% / -156%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 12.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 359 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 359 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 359 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Performance, emissions and battery – Adequate power

Samsung has made use of an SoC that is commonly seen within this price class, namely the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, and it delivers comparatively good performance. Even so, you won't be able to avoid the odd dropped frame or long waiting times during simple, everyday use.

You also shouldn't expect too much from its graphics performance. However, if you lower the detail settings, then most mobile games should run okay. When it comes to AI calculations, you should probably reach for a different SoC, as the Dimensity 6100+ only offers basic capabilities and is not all that fast.

Although you can feel its case heat up under permanent load—we measured up to 43.8°C—this isn't problematic. We didn't note any throttling during the long-term benchmarks of 3DMark.

The mono speaker on the bottom edge offers clear vocal reproduction and a decent volume. The speaker doesn't distort sound even at high volumes. Nevertheless, music and movie sound always sound a little weak-chested due to its lack of low mids and bass. For those who prefer to connect headphones or speakers, there is a 3.5 mm jack connection or Bluetooth 5.3. Only the bare minimum in terms of audio codecs are supported for wireless playback: Samsung's own SSC, as well as SBC, aptX, LDAC and AAC.

With its 6,000 mAh battery, the Galaxy M15 5G features around 1,000 mAh more than is usual for this price range. This enabled runtimes of 19:04 hours in our WLAN test and even 2 days of normal use shouldn't be a problem for the phone. Its powerful battery can be charged at up to 25 watts, which takes a maximum of 2:45 hours.

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
769 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
699 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (678 - 699, n=5)
692 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
690 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
411 Points -41%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
376 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1991 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1814 - 1944, n=5)
1879 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1866 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1814 Points -3%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1324 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1251 Points -33%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=183, last 2 years)
935 Points +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
593 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
538 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
530 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (517 - 538, n=5)
527 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
341 Points -36%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
307 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=183, last 2 years)
3128 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1943 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1780 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1740 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1589 - 1780, n=5)
1689 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1337 Points -23%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1270 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=193, last 2 years)
12453 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10567 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9403 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9078 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9018 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8482 - 9078, n=5)
8841 Points -3%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
8059 Points -11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=166, last 2 years)
7356 Points +196%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2818 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2502 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2468 - 2503, n=5)
2488 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2487 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1453 Points -42%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
977 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=165, last 2 years)
10832 Points +365%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2615 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2336 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2330 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2281 - 2344, n=5)
2321 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1278 Points -45%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
829 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=165, last 2 years)
4462 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3873 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (3258 - 3459, n=5)
3330 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3327 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3258 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
2793 Points -14%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2608 Points -20%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (404 - 13896, n=119, last 2 years)
2801 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1330 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1228 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1222 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1186 - 1230, n=5)
1219 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
730 Points -40%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
426 Points -65%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (403 - 20068, n=181, last 2 years)
6924 Points +474%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1316 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1207 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1204 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1174 - 1208, n=5)
1200 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
726 Points -40%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
422 Points -65%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=185, last 2 years)
1854 Points +464%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
368 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
336 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (328 - 338, n=5)
332 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
329 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
187 Points -43%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
117 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 5248, n=182, last 2 years)
1859 Points +476%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
360 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
325 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (319 - 330, n=5)
325 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
323 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
182 Points -44%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
113 Points -65%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
46.3 fps +231%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.4 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps -7%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
10 fps -29%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=201, last 2 years)
71.5 fps +377%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (15 - 15, n=5)
15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.8 fps -41%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.5 fps -63%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
34.6 fps +298%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.9 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.6 fps -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8.4 - 8.7, n=5)
8.54 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
7.4 fps -15%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
0.85 fps -90%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=201, last 2 years)
28.8 fps +405%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.9 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.7 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (5.7 - 5.7, n=5)
5.7 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.3 fps -42%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2 fps -65%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=200, last 2 years)
13.6 fps +467%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
6.6 fps +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.5 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2.3 - 2.4, n=5)
2.38 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.5 fps -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
34402 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
22638 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (21764 - 22638, n=5)
22293 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22145 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21764 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14717 Points -35%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
12195 Points -46%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +134%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (277 - 293, n=2)
285 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
277 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +321%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
201 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
177 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (173 - 177, n=2)
175 Points -1%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points +115%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
393 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
384 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (381 - 384, n=2)
383 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5GSamsung Galaxy A15 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMotorola Moto G24HMD Pulse ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
36%
-50%
48%
11%
126%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.2
499.6
2%
951.97
93%
291.9
-41%
966
96%
Sequential Write 256KB
493.7
498.1
1%
503.79
2%
252
-49%
824
67%
Random Read 4KB
198.3
194
-2%
243.8
23%
86.3
-56%
205
3%
190.1 ?(89.3 - 297, n=69)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
189.9
223.5
18%
240.36
27%
90.9
-52%
239
26%
183.3 ?(62.6 - 419, n=69)
-3%

Temperature

Max. Load
 42.3 °C
108 F
37.6 °C
100 F
35.4 °C
96 F
 
 43.8 °C
111 F
36.8 °C
98 F
35.2 °C
95 F
 
 42.9 °C
109 F
37.5 °C
100 F
34.9 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 43.8 °C = 111 F
Average: 38.5 °C = 101 F
33.1 °C
92 F
37.6 °C
100 F
41.6 °C
107 F
33.8 °C
93 F
39 °C
102 F
43.6 °C
110 F
33.2 °C
92 F
38 °C
100 F
43.6 °C
110 F
Maximum: 43.6 °C = 110 F
Average: 38.2 °C = 101 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.02 (1.981-2.04)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.04)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.22 (2.21-2.22)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.128 (1.121-1.139)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.16-7.36)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.34 (7.3-7.35)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.98 (7.96-8.01)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.39 (4.36-4.41)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.55-2.58)

Speaker

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.839.52534.835.23129.6284031.432.65036.636.76325.325.48018.423.510018.9221251629.116014.538.420018.842.525014.346.63151053.540010.460.550010.663.26309.862.88001168.4100013.971.1125010.271.5160010.271.5200010.471.8250011.169.9315011.972.8400012.576.4500013.37463001476800014.877.81000015.4671250016.265.4160001760SPL24.885N0.661.4median 13.3median 67Delta2.69.543.738.933.232.129.326.432.331.440.735.632.626.319.718.616.917.615.518.913.330.79.633.611.835.69.237.88.7451153.113.257.813.761.914.867.113.77010.672.710.97212.368.913.765.213.663.613.968.114.467.815.660.515.959.21654.916.744.925.879.90.741.1median 13.7median 59.22.113.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M15 5GHMD Pulse Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HMD Pulse Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Runtimes

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
6000 mAh
1144 min
Motorola Moto G24
5000 mAh
969 min -15%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
5000 mAh
965 min -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
958 min -16%
HMD Pulse Pro
5000 mAh
899 min -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
5000 mAh
801 min -30%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 04min

Pros

+ 5G ready
+ long runtimes
+ camera system with a wide-angle lens
+ bright and color-accurate AMOLED
+ long update promise
+ isn't throttled under load

Cons

- heavier than similar smartphones
- few Bluetooth audio codecs
- PWM flickering
- no eSIM support

Verdict – Samsung has put together a great deal

Samsung Galaxy M15 5G review
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G review

Samsung's Galaxy M15 5G is a pretty good total package for a low price: It features 5G support, a bright AMOLED display, a large battery and a wide-angle camera—none of which are a given within this price class.

The phone has been constructed well and it looks attractive thanks to the reflections on the back. When it comes to software updates, Samsung offers a wonderful 4 operating system versions and 5 years of security patches—some high-end devices don't even get as much. 

Its battery life is great, its speaker can get quite loud and its camera system delivers decent quality—although you may still have to reduce your expectations as a result of the phone's low price.

However, you will have to accept a slightly higher weight due to the device's large battery and a slightly thicker case. Its processor can't perform any miracles and occasionally falters.

If you are looking for the most features for a low price, then the Samsung Galaxy M15 5G is a good choice.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is similarly well-equipped. If you want to save some weight, then you might want to take a closer look at the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Samsung Galaxy M15 5G is not yet available to purchase in the United States. Its MRSP is just under US$200.

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Samsung Galaxy M15 5G - 07/17/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
40 / 69 → 57%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 64%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
58%
Average
64%
72%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
91.1%
Materials
15%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
85%
Total Sustainability Score: 57.7%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Samsung Galaxy M15 5G smartphone review – AMOLED, a wide-angle camera and a huge battery for under US$200
Florian Schmitt, 2024-07-18 (Update: 2024-07-18)