Notebookcheck Logo
Meswao MES B3 tablet review

When the tablet can't be big enough - azamp / Meswao MES-B3 review

All others are dwarves.

A 15.6-inch screen is already mid-range for a laptop, but for a tablet it is truly huge. The MES-B3 tablet is marketed under the azamp and Meswao brands, but both tablets are identical and, in addition to the large screen, come with a powerful battery and even an update guarantee.
Florian Schmitt 👁 (translated by Florian Schmitt) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM Tablet

Verdict

The Meswao MES-B3 or azamp MES-B3 is a special tablet: a display in 16:9 format is rare and then with 15.6 inches, that is almost unique. The large display has its advantages, especially when watching videos, when the entire screen area is utilised. Streaming in 1440p on YouTube works smoothly.

It's a shame that the manufacturer hasn't taken care of Widevine licensing, then you could also enjoy HD content from other streaming providers. When it comes to security updates, the manufacturer talks about an update guarantee until 2027, but this is not realised in practice: The security patches on our test device are already over a year old.

You shouldn't expect much in terms of cameras and speakers. The screen is also not particularly bright, but is usually sufficient for indoor use. At least there is no PWM flickering when the brightness is low.

The runtimes are okay, but charging takes a long time. The performance is sufficient, but you have to put up with occasional stutters and waiting times.

Overall, the azamp / Meswao MES-B3 focuses very much on its highlight, the large screen. If this is sufficient as an argument and you can live with the disadvantages mentioned, then you can definitely have fun with the tablet in everyday life.

Pros

+ huge screen
+ stable chassis
+ no PWM flickering
+ expandable memory
+ smooth 1,440p streaming also possible

Cons

- completely outdated security patches
- heavy, over 1.1 kg
- slow charging
- no Widevine certification
- slow eMMC storage
- no biometric unlocking

Price and availability

The test device is available as azamp MES-B3 and Meswao MES-B3. The prices differ significantly in some cases, even though they are the same tablet.

The cheapest at the time of testing is the Meswao MES-B3 in grey at around $377 at amazon.com.

Amazon Logo
$377.19
MESWAO 15.6 Inch Android 14 Tablet, 2025 Large Tablet with1080 IPS HD Display Big Screen, 8-Core, 6GB+128GB, Support 512G TF Card, 12000mAh Long Lasting Battery for Movie/Work-Space Gray

Specifications

azamp MES-B3
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.7 x 361 x 218 ( = 0.22 x 14.21 x 8.58 in)
Battery
12000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.8
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.1 kg ( = 38.8 oz / 2.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
399 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and equipment – Heavy, but stable

A tablet weighing over 1.1 kilograms is rarely carried around with you. In return, the MES-B3 offers a huge 15.6-inch screen in 16:9 format. The width of the screen edge is medium.

The back is slightly roughened and available in grey, black or white. The tablet is very stable for its size and can hardly be twisted. Pressure quickly reaches the liquid crystal and forms visible waves.

With 6 GB RAM and 128 GB mass storage, the tablet is sparcely equipped for its price range. The memory can be expanded via a microSD reader, although it does not transfer data very quickly.

Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet

Größenvergleich

361 mm / 14.2 in 218 mm / 8.58 in 5.7 mm / 0.2244 in 1.1 kg2.43 lbs325 mm / 12.8 in 214 mm / 8.43 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 960 g2.12 lbs326.4 mm / 12.9 in 208.6 mm / 8.21 in 5.4 mm / 0.2126 in 718 g1.583 lbs305.8 mm / 12 in 207.5 mm / 8.17 in 5.1 mm / 0.2008 in 609 g1.343 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.48 MB/s +40%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
47.3 MB/s +40%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 58.4, n=60, last 2 years)
35.1 MB/s +4%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
33.9 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
azamp MES-B3; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (28.9-46.5)
azamp MES-B3; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (17.8-86.5)

Communication and operation – Tablet with WiFi 5

WiFi 5 is the fastest WiFi standard that the tablet comes with. The expected data rates of around 300 MBit/s are achieved quite stably.

There is no variant with 5G reception and no satellite positioning.

The touchscreen works reasonably accurately, although you have to repeat a command from time to time. The buttons at the top of the tablet for standby and volume are a little small, but are easy to find. Unlocking the tablet via fingerprint sensor or facial recognition is not possible.

Networking
azamp MES-B3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
298 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
361 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T70
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
92.7 (min: 57) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
120 (min: 100) MBit/s ∼8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
741 (min: 557) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1487 (min: 1246) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
345 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼22%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
554 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
578 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1394 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼76%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
azamp MES-B3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø298 (263-316)
azamp MES-B3; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø361 (338-386)

Software and sustainability – The update promise sounds good, but...

Android 14 is pre-installed on the tablet. The security patches could also do with a new version, as they date back to 2024.

This is a shame, as the manufacturer actually promises updates until 2027, but these are apparently not being provided.

CO2-neutral production via emissions offsetting is promised, but this cannot be verified. Other sustainability efforts are not recognisable.

Cameras - Hardly useful

Aufnahme Frontkamera
Aufnahme Frontkamera

There is a 32-megapixel sensor at the back, which serves as the main camera. However, this is only a makeshift, taking coarse and grainy photos that lack dynamism and sharpness. They are also taken in 16:9 format by default, which is rather unusual for still images.

Videos can be recorded in a maximum of 1,440p at 30 fps. The autofocus and brightness correction are a little slow, but overall the videos are OK.

The front camera takes passable selfies, but these are also a little grainy.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker azamp MES-B3: 6.66 ∆E min: 3.77 - max: 12.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker azamp MES-B3: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

Display – Large but dim display

Subpixel-Aufnahme
Subpixel-Aufnahme

The large screen is certainly the highlight of the azamp MES-B3 or Meswao MES-B3. At 15.6 inches, it is indeed enormous for a tablet and, with its 16:9 format, offers ideal conditions for watching videos, as most videos on the Internet are available in this format.

However, there is one problem: the MES-B3 does not have Widevine L1 certification and is therefore not suitable for copy-protected content. Streaming on Netflix and co. will therefore only work in SD.

The maximum brightness of the screen is not particularly high at just under 300 cd/m², but it is sufficient for indoor use. While greyscales are only displayed with a slight yellow tint, there are strong colour deviations, especially in blue tones and strong colours: The picture appears very dull overall.

The screen comes without PWM flickering.

269
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 296 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 269.2 cd/m² Minimum: 15.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 643:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.79 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
63.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.135
CCT: 6145 K
azamp MES-B3
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"
Teclast T70
IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x2136, 14"
Screen
72%
30%
73%
Brightness middle
296
605
104%
400
35%
566
91%
Brightness
269
603
124%
385
43%
540
101%
Brightness Distribution
83
98
18%
92
11%
89
7%
Black Level *
0.46
0.36
22%
Contrast
643
1111
73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.79
2.6
55%
5.15
11%
0.91
84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.26
5.4
73%
10.41
49%
1.59
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
1.6
57%
4
-8%
1.4
62%
Gamma
2.135 103%
2.08 106%
2.131 103%
2.251 98%
CCT
6145 106%
6405 101%
7235 90%
6703 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8342 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Grayscales
CalMAN Grayscales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.3 ms rise
↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.5 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life – Enough power for 1440p

Thanks to the MediaTek Helio G99, the giant tablet delivers mid-range power. The performance is usually sufficient for everyday use. Streaming via YouTube even works smoothly with a resolution of 1,440p. Unfortunately, the eMMC memory is very slow and delays loading times and copying processes.

The tablet barely heats up under prolonged load and the SoC only minimally reduces its performance.

The large tablet comes with four speakers. However, these are not really loud and are very treble-heavy. It's more fun to connect external speakers or loudspeakers. This can be done via USB or wirelessly via Bluetooth. A large selection of wireless audio codecs is available so that you can listen to music in good quality.

The 12,000 mAh battery enables a runtime of up to 17:35 minutes in our WLAN test. This is OK, but not record-breaking; the large screen probably limits the runtime here. Charging takes just under 6 hours at maximum, as only 15 watts of charging power is available.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2718 Points +273%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2192 Points +201%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=96, last 2 years)
1281 Points +76%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
728 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (704 - 738, n=16)
724 Points -1%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
715 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
9097 Points +378%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7327 Points +285%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=96, last 2 years)
4083 Points +115%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1784 - 2065, n=16)
1953 Points +3%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1902 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1811 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16743 Points +62%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
16503 Points +60%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years)
11155 Points +8%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10333 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10265 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=22)
9900 Points -4%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 8911, n=64, last 2 years)
1808 Points +44%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1255 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=22)
1232 Points -2%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1203 Points -4%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
21789 Points +1645%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
18628 Points +1391%
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=87, last 2 years)
5913 Points +373%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1249 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1211 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1011 - 1340, n=22)
1199 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
6509 Points +1728%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5356 Points +1404%
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=90, last 2 years)
1918 Points +439%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
356 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
352 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=22)
346 Points -3%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
6546 Points +1713%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5527 Points +1431%
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=89, last 2 years)
2090 Points +479%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
361 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
355 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=22)
338 Points -6%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
9934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
8498 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (3654 - 15576, n=25, last 2 years)
8151 Points
Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
9983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
8402 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (3698 - 14922, n=25, last 2 years)
7896 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
98 fps +476%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
93 fps +447%
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 122, n=93, last 2 years)
33.8 fps +99%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.5 - 44, n=22)
16.2 fps -5%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10.3 fps -39%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
287 fps +1694%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
209 fps +1206%
Average of class Tablet
  (3.9 - 340, n=93, last 2 years)
77.3 fps +383%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
17 fps +6%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=22)
15.7 fps -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
67 fps +509%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
65 fps +491%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=93, last 2 years)
23.8 fps +116%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
11 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 28, n=22)
10.6 fps -4%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6.5 fps -41%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
114 fps +1800%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
89 fps +1383%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.4 - 125, n=93, last 2 years)
29.4 fps +390%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6 fps 0%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=22)
5.87 fps -2%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
55 fps +2100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
43 fps +1620%
Average of class Tablet
  (0.6 - 55.1, n=93, last 2 years)
13.5 fps +440%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.6 fps +4%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=22)
2.5 fps 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
81322 Points +207%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
71054 Points +168%
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years)
36364 Points +37%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
26476 Points
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22689 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 26476, n=22)
21801 Points -18%
azamp MES-B3Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraTeclast T70Xiaomi Pad 7 UltraAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
817%
118%
860%
-22%
246%
Sequential Read 256KB
285.6
3912.45
1270%
975.4
242%
3782.3
1224%
Sequential Write 256KB
174.5
2963.58
1598%
505.3
190%
3098.21
1675%
195.5 ?(72.3 - 314, n=84)
12%
Random Read 4KB
146.6
342.97
134%
165.1
13%
445.76
204%
84.6 ?(8.63 - 247, n=84)
-42%
Random Write 4KB
152.3
554.76
264%
195.5
28%
667.18
338%
Max. Load
 31 °C
88 F
30 °C
86 F
26.9 °C
80 F
 
 33.5 °C
92 F
29.3 °C
85 F
27.5 °C
82 F
 
 31.9 °C
89 F
30.2 °C
86 F
28.2 °C
83 F
 
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 29.8 °C = 86 F
27.5 °C
82 F
27.6 °C
82 F
32.5 °C
91 F
27.8 °C
82 F
29.2 °C
85 F
32.9 °C
91 F
28.2 °C
83 F
28.4 °C
83 F
31.6 °C
89 F
Maximum: 32.9 °C = 91 F
Average: 29.5 °C = 85 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 %
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92.3 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 % -27%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.5 % -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -28%
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Rückseite
Heatmap Rückseite
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204651.12537.840.23130.8314033.334.25033.734.16323.227.68020.322.610021.82612520.420.316022.219.420018.523.125015.230.53151740.340014.647.350016.753.463021.862.280021.164.1100016.967.9125017.964.7160016.165.4200014.368.3250014.965.8315016.569.4400018.671.3500022.870.2630023.472.8800023.673.4100002058.41250018.947.81600019.152.3SPL31.880.7N1.546.3median 18.6median 62.2Delta2.813.942.339.740.636.731.830.629.739.436.435.924.327.319.425.122.226.820.729.718.838.818.844.219.250.615.557.615.356.717.460.124.369.126.974.722.183.418.779.817.675.316.77615.56915.268.917.173.421.373.524.479.326.978.823.473.417.565.917.957.433.888.51.873.4median 18.8median 69.12.99.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noiseazamp MES-B3Teclast T70
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
azamp MES-B3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Teclast T70 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 35min
azamp MES-B3
12000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh
Teclast T70
10000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
12000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-45%
-11%
21%
WiFi v1.3
1055
585
-45%
943
-11%
1281
21%
Reader / Idle
935
1474
H.264
721
1023
1305
Load
207
224

Notebookcheck overall rating

Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet
Review Meswao MES B3 Tablet

If you absolutely need a huge screen, then the MES-B3 is almost unrivalled.

However, there are some hard pills to swallow, such as the completely outdated security patches.

azamp MES-B3 - 07/19/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
32 / 69 → 46%
Weight
74 / 40-88 → 70%
Battery
91%
Display
68%
Games Performance
6 / 65 → 8%
Application Performance
56 / 92 → 61%
AI Performance
20%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
39 / 90 → 43%
Average
47%
72%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
5%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
8.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 12.4%

Comparison of possible alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
72.1%
azamp MES-B3
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $377.19
List Price: 399€
1.1 kg128 GB eMMC Flash15.60"
1920x1080
141 PPI
IPS
2.
87.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,189.93
SAMSUNG - Galaxy Tab S10 Ult...
2. $849.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus...
3. $839.87
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra...
List Price: 1339€
718 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash14.60"
2960x1848
239 PPI
AMOLED 2X
3.
72.8%
Teclast T70
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $21.99
14.1-inch Android Tablet Cas...
2. $19.89
for Teclast T70 /Callsky-Tab...
3. $18.89
Case for Teclast T70 14.1-in...
List Price: 270€
960 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash14.00"
1920x1200
162 PPI
IPS
4.
89.7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $402.00
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $609.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $296.00
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 870€
609 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash14.00"
3200x2136
275 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > When the tablet can't be big enough - azamp / Meswao MES-B3 review
Florian Schmitt, 2025-07-20 (Update: 2025-07-20)