Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 +2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.6 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135H also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be at least as fast as the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to give the Radeon 780M something to think about. The Arc is set to be miles ahead of aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus higher performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 135H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

Performance

The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 135HIntel Core i9-13900HX
CodenameMeteor Lake-HRaptor Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H « 3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4600 MHz1600 - 5400 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18 4.6 GHz
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x Intel Crestmont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA1964
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enerp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache32 MB
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
45 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.2 Points (56%)
121.4 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
575 Points (11%)
1675 Points (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10951     avg: 11876     median: 11875.5 (11%)     max: 12800 Points
min: 24270     avg: 28275     median: 27900 (26%)     max: 32623 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1672     avg: 1700     median: 1700 (72%)     max: 1728 Points
min: 1867     avg: 2044     median: 2056 (86%)     max: 2105 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
652 Points (71%)
min: 722     avg: 784     median: 788 (86%)     max: 810 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4228 Points (10%)
min: 9152     avg: 10785     median: 10557 (26%)     max: 12541 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1718 Points (11%)
min: 3913     avg: 4521     median: 4494.5 (28%)     max: 4970 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (68%)
min: 247     avg: 292     median: 296 (82%)     max: 304 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 49.5     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (68%)     max: 55.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.64     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9317 Points (56%)
min: 11618     avg: 11700     median: 11699.5 (71%)     max: 11781 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42283 Points (31%)
min: 76718     avg: 79300     median: 79299.5 (57%)     max: 81881 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111582 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17169 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
506 s (6%)
215.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12876     avg: 12916     median: 12916 (20%)     max: 12956 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4839 MIPS (57%)
min: 6340     avg: 6859     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7177 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90675     avg: 112115     median: 115262 (66%)     max: 127283 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
98 fps (33%)
217.7 fps (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
271.5 fps (63%)
387.7 fps (89%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.5 fps (22%)
min: 23.5     avg: 29.2     median: 29.8 (52%)     max: 34.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 2.1     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (73%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.3 GB/s (19%)
min: 15.2     avg: 17     median: 17 (44%)     max: 18.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
542 Seconds (7%)
min: 175     avg: 209.9     median: 202 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
338 Seconds (2%)
min: 101     avg: 117.6     median: 113.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4564 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12383 Points (26%)
min: 16591     avg: 17802     median: 18036.5 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.4 s (2%)
min: 6.2     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.215 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
457.8 s (2%)
min: 315     avg: 315.1     median: 315.1 (1%)     max: 315.265 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (59%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14970 Points (37%)
min: 19090     avg: 23181     median: 23767 (59%)     max: 25681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76741 Points (62%)
min: 77043     avg: 86045     median: 83045 (67%)     max: 101046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85007 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13970 Points (35%)
min: 16532     avg: 21282     median: 21573 (55%)     max: 23984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
19468 Points (35%)
min: 28693     avg: 37096     median: 37730 (67%)     max: 43004 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7281 Points (31%)
min: 13288     avg: 15302     median: 15066 (64%)     max: 18304 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2257     avg: 2278     median: 2278 (57%)     max: 2299 Points
min: 2548     avg: 2770     median: 2871 (72%)     max: 2892 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10077     avg: 10368     median: 10368 (40%)     max: 10659 Points
min: 15031     avg: 16586     median: 16712 (65%)     max: 18014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2191     avg: 2625     median: 2713 (86%)     max: 2818 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 14982     avg: 16173     median: 16420.5 (67%)     max: 16949 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1640     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (65%)     max: 1663 Points
min: 1345     avg: 1991     median: 2041.5 (80%)     max: 2093 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8637     avg: 9226     median: 9225.5 (17%)     max: 9814 Points
min: 17614     avg: 19819     median: 20013.5 (36%)     max: 21075 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1804     avg: 1964     median: 1982 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18612     avg: 19451     median: 19027 (60%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6693 Points (67%)
min: 8706     avg: 8840     median: 8843 (88%)     max: 8936 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32577 Points (32%)
min: 66537     avg: 70316     median: 71143 (71%)     max: 71700 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
571 ms (1%)
min: 453     avg: 471     median: 464 (1%)     max: 520 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
57.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92150 Points (67%)
min: 95898     avg: 101834     median: 103988 (76%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (64%)
min: 243     avg: 289.1     median: 291 (80%)     max: 304 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
264 Points (47%)
min: 266     avg: 321.9     median: 322 (58%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1465 Points (55%)
min: 1825     avg: 2073     median: 2113.5 (79%)     max: 2295 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.9 Watt (9%)
min: 106.1     avg: 173.5     median: 178.7 (31%)     max: 231 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.4 Watt (10%)
min: 176     avg: 216.9     median: 222 (41%)     max: 266 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
min: 13.9     avg: 24.1     median: 25 (17%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 19.7     median: 18.8 (21%)     max: 29 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.2 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 19.5     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (16%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135H → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 179% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 00:40:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16909 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755643248s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16909 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 16909 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.029s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.102s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)