Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840U vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 +2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.6 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135H also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be at least as fast as the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to give the Radeon 780M something to think about. The Arc is set to be miles ahead of aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus higher performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 135H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840U

The Ryzen 7 8840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 8840U is a rebadged R7 7840U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around the 8840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8840U is a 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This means the chip is fast enough to make 99% of consumers happy, as of December 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Just like the 7640U, the R5 8640U has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640U has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640U is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the chip to be at least 10% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The 8640U has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640U is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 135HAMD Ryzen 7 8840UAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
CodenameMeteor Lake-HHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H « 3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4600 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18 4.6 GHz
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enerp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840U
38.2 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640U
37 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.2 Points (56%)
98 Points (55%)
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
575 Points (11%)
748 Points (14%)
581 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10951     avg: 11876     median: 11875.5 (11%)     max: 12800 Points
min: 10162     avg: 12191     median: 12972 (12%)     max: 13563 Points
10433 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1672     avg: 1700     median: 1700 (72%)     max: 1728 Points
min: 1088     avg: 1619     median: 1703 (72%)     max: 1740 Points
1651 Points (69%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
652 Points (71%)
min: 427     avg: 621     median: 665 (73%)     max: 680 Points
644 Points (70%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4228 Points (10%)
min: 3987     avg: 4817     median: 5067 (12%)     max: 5336 Points
4096 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1718 Points (11%)
min: 1539     avg: 2003     median: 2024 (13%)     max: 2453 Points
1663 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (68%)
min: 176.6     avg: 249.7     median: 266 (74%)     max: 275 Points
256 Points (71%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.1 Points (31%)
19 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
3 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9317 Points (56%)
7381 Points (45%)
7211 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42283 Points (31%)
41306 Points (30%)
34915 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71128 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13618 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
506 s (6%)
84.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5930 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4839 MIPS (57%)
min: 4168     avg: 5727     median: 6012 (71%)     max: 6469 MIPS
6018 MIPS (71%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47579     avg: 54539     median: 57550 (33%)     max: 59549 MIPS
47187 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
98 fps (33%)
118.7 fps (40%)
94.8 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
271.5 fps (63%)
267 fps (62%)
238 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.5 fps (22%)
min: 12.5     avg: 15.2     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.5 fps
11.9 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
1.1 GB/s (32%)
0.9 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.3 GB/s (19%)
11.5 GB/s (30%)
9.2 GB/s (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
542 Seconds (7%)
min: 383     avg: 423.6     median: 405 (5%)     max: 517 Seconds
499 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
338 Seconds (2%)
min: 239     avg: 264.4     median: 246 (2%)     max: 315 Seconds
301 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.4514     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.678 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12383 Points (26%)
min: 13841     avg: 14195     median: 14245 (30%)     max: 14498 Points
13014 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.4 s (2%)
8.8 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
457.8 s (2%)
754 s (3%)
670 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67701     avg: 68184     median: 68141 (52%)     max: 68709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14970 Points (37%)
min: 13875     avg: 16398     median: 17132 (42%)     max: 18587 Points
15121 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76741 Points (62%)
min: 51143     avg: 64986     median: 64712.5 (53%)     max: 79375 Points
76663 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51152     avg: 61249     median: 51313 (42%)     max: 81282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78859     avg: 83002     median: 84626 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13970 Points (35%)
min: 10973     avg: 14368     median: 13601 (34%)     max: 17112 Points
12271 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
19468 Points (35%)
min: 17856     avg: 20716     median: 21341 (38%)     max: 23864 Points
18779 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7281 Points (31%)
min: 6208     avg: 8025     median: 8271 (35%)     max: 9004 Points
6578 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2257     avg: 2278     median: 2278 (57%)     max: 2299 Points
min: 1654     avg: 2354     median: 2528 (63%)     max: 2607 Points
2464 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10077     avg: 10368     median: 10368 (40%)     max: 10659 Points
min: 9609     avg: 10699     median: 10366 (40%)     max: 12664 Points
9903 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2384 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
10532 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1640     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (65%)     max: 1663 Points
min: 1278     avg: 1761     median: 1879 (73%)     max: 1937 Points
1822 Points (71%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8637     avg: 9226     median: 9225.5 (17%)     max: 9814 Points
min: 8205     avg: 9600     median: 9258 (17%)     max: 11296 Points
8507 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1817 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8056 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6693 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32577 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7340 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
31951 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
571 ms (1%)
min: 515     avg: 581     median: 539 (1%)     max: 779 ms
551 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
57.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92150 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (64%)
min: 170.4     avg: 225.3     median: 240.8 (66%)     max: 249 Points
235 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
264 Points (47%)
min: 216     avg: 286.2     median: 303 (54%)     max: 306 Points
272 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1465 Points (55%)
min: 1541     avg: 1639     median: 1625 (61%)     max: 1766 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.9 Watt (9%)
min: 31.5     avg: 43.2     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 50 Watt
35.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.4 Watt (10%)
min: 28.2     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (8%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
min: 5.47     avg: 9.5     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 16.9 Watt
5 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.93     avg: 10.8     median: 9.4 (10%)     max: 22.5 Watt
10.4 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.2 Points per Watt (24%)
54.6 Points per Watt (41%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135H → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840U → 110% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640U → 99% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 03. 01:00:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16909 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16401 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16405 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751497200s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16909 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 16909 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16401 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 16401 +0.009s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16405 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 16405 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.092s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)