Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840U

The Ryzen 7 8840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 8840U is a rebadged R7 7840U with virtually no differences between the two to report. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties; the 8840U also features Ryzen AI, now in its 2nd generation, which is AMD's answer to Intel's GNA and DL Boost technologies.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around the 8840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8840U is a 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This means the chip is fast enough to make 99% of consumers happy, as of December 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U that we are dealing with here. Just like the 7640U, the R5 8640U has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Furthermore, this Ryzen 5 series laptop chip comes with the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640U has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640U is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the chip to be at least 10% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The 8640U has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640U is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840UAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840U
42.3 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
98 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
748 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12972 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1701 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
665 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5067 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2024 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
263 Points (79%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.1 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7381 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41306 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71128 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13618 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
84.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
57795 MIPS (33%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5921 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.7 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
267 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.5 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.5 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
383 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
239 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13841     avg: 14195     median: 14245 (30%)     max: 14498 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
754 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67701     avg: 68184     median: 68141 (60%)     max: 68709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13875     avg: 16591     median: 17505 (47%)     max: 18393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51143     avg: 60560     median: 51161 (42%)     max: 79375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51152     avg: 61249     median: 51313 (42%)     max: 81282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78859     avg: 83002     median: 84626 (71%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10973     avg: 14894     median: 16597 (42%)     max: 17112 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18217     avg: 21447     median: 22259 (40%)     max: 23864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8271     avg: 8577     median: 8455 (36%)     max: 9004 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2537 Points (77%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
11144 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1894 Points (80%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10014 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
515 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
248 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
302 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1566 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
16.9 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
22.5 Watt (25%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 09. 21:36:23

#0 checking url part for id 16401 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16405 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16401 +0.02s ... 0.051s

#7 got single benchmarks 16401 +0.013s ... 0.065s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16405 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#9 got single benchmarks 16405 +0s ... 0.068s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.167s ... 0.235s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.259s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)