Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Strix Halo
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz3000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache24 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8FP11
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI80 TOPS INT8126 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.9 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.9     median: 117 (66%)     max: 121 Points
min: 114     avg: 115.4     median: 116 (65%)     max: 116.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1078     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
min: 1648     avg: 1805     median: 1827 (34%)     max: 1912 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20619     median: 21897 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 29063     avg: 34856     median: 35991 (33%)     max: 37423 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2011     median: 2018.5 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 2034     avg: 2045     median: 2044 (86%)     max: 2052 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 791     avg: 799     median: 800 (87%)     max: 803 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8404     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 11357     avg: 13533     median: 13882 (34%)     max: 14641 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3248     median: 3448 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 4739     avg: 5371     median: 5488 (35%)     max: 5881 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 188.8     avg: 295.3     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 314     avg: 316.4     median: 317 (88%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.1     median: 40.1 (52%)     max: 41.17 Points
min: 55.9     avg: 63.2     median: 64.3 (83%)     max: 68.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
min: 3.72     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8437     avg: 8635     median: 8653.5 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
min: 8691     avg: 8704     median: 8698 (53%)     max: 8728 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 52505     avg: 54759     median: 54920 (40%)     max: 56689 Points
min: 62519     avg: 66954     median: 65332 (47%)     max: 74633 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 99802     median: 99347 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
min: 110924     avg: 123266     median: 114175 (73%)     max: 144699 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15381     avg: 15735     median: 15812.5 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
min: 16057     avg: 16159     median: 16196 (20%)     max: 16223 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 73.5     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.476 s
min: 32.773     avg: 111.5     median: 33.1 (0%)     max: 347.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
min: 2.361     avg: 3.7     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 7.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4416     median: 4424.5 (7%)     max: 4806 Points
min: 3413     avg: 14883     median: 8853.5 (14%)     max: 38410 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78686     median: 80868 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
min: 116237     avg: 123900     median: 121368 (70%)     max: 136872 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6174     median: 6179 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 6474     avg: 6501     median: 6499 (77%)     max: 6540 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 164.85     avg: 172.8     median: 170.6 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
min: 188.8     avg: 204.4     median: 189.4 (5%)     max: 235 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300     avg: 310.1     median: 305.3 (8%)     max: 330 fps
min: 320.5     avg: 324.5     median: 325.5 (8%)     max: 327.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.4     median: 26.3 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 32.4     avg: 35.1     median: 33.7 (59%)     max: 40.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 1.7     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (46%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
min: 2.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.6     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
min: 16.7     avg: 21.5     median: 20.2 (53%)     max: 28.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 236.7     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 132     avg: 140.6     median: 134 (2%)     max: 163 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 154.9     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 86     avg: 91.6     median: 87 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.3984     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4094 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16238     median: 16563 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
min: 16575     avg: 17918     median: 17702.5 (38%)     max: 19691 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
min: 8.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 8.359 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.914 s
min: 17.502     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.659 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
407.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 74245     median: 76054 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
min: 88295     avg: 91621     median: 91177 (70%)     max: 95834 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20432     median: 20777.5 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
min: 22033     avg: 25525     median: 26998 (66%)     max: 28889 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 60316     median: 61356.5 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
min: 75830     avg: 79255     median: 77087 (63%)     max: 84504 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 61354     median: 63791.5 (52%)     max: 67802 Points
min: 75621     avg: 78854     median: 77354 (63%)     max: 83969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
min: 76968     avg: 79446     median: 79260.5 (64%)     max: 82293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19488     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 21608     avg: 23690     median: 23927.5 (61%)     max: 25765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 30106     median: 30538 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 30555     avg: 35481     median: 37386 (67%)     max: 39630 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10478     median: 10630 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 9451     avg: 10534     median: 10837 (46%)     max: 11285 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2886     median: 2877 (70%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2791     avg: 2909     median: 2929 (71%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14641     median: 15043 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
min: 16510     avg: 19000     median: 17599 (68%)     max: 22157 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2748     median: 2766 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
min: 2819     avg: 2820     median: 2819.5 (90%)     max: 2820 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12289     avg: 13899     median: 14313 (59%)     max: 15017 Points
min: 16420     avg: 16428     median: 16428 (67%)     max: 16436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2087     median: 2097 (80%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 2184     avg: 2224     median: 2228 (85%)     max: 2275 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14281     median: 14477.5 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
min: 16535     avg: 19467     median: 17552 (31%)     max: 24593 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1936     median: 1942 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
min: 1991     avg: 2060     median: 2091 (9%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14257     median: 14353 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
min: 16628     avg: 19726     median: 17929 (57%)     max: 24621 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 7996     median: 7804 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
min: 8054     avg: 8190     median: 8220 (82%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52953     median: 54787 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
min: 66187     avg: 78352     median: 66840 (66%)     max: 102029 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 307.8     avg: 433.4     median: 433.5 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 424     avg: 431.8     median: 427 (0%)     max: 453 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 111154     median: 122035 (89%)     max: 125813 Points
123023 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 258.6     median: 259 (71%)     max: 345 Points
min: 252     avg: 274.2     median: 273 (75%)     max: 317 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 311.3     median: 321 (58%)     max: 363 Points
min: 302     avg: 325.2     median: 320 (57%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1793     median: 1785 (67%)     max: 2040 Points
min: 1948     avg: 2089     median: 2069 (77%)     max: 2274 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.6     median: 93 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 111.2     avg: 157.5     median: 169.9 (29%)     max: 184.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 95.3     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 133.2     avg: 177     median: 192.8 (35%)     max: 200 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.58     avg: 8.8     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 8.18     avg: 9.9     median: 10.5 (7%)     max: 11.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.4     median: 9.2 (11%)     max: 12.8 Watt
13.8 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 35.8     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 27.9     avg: 31.4     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 36.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 → 123% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 13. 17:58:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18628 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760371116s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.019s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18628 +0.007s ... 0.035s

#10 got single benchmarks 18628 +0.019s ... 0.055s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.094s ... 0.149s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.151s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)