Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (or R5 PRO 230) is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in early 2025. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen 5 7640U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Just like the older chips, the R5 230 has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 5 230, the PRO model offers additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments, such as Secure Processor (an ARM security co-processor).

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R5 PRO 230 has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the Ryzen 5 230 is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The CPU performance is the same as the older Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen 5 7640U due to the same specifications. That means the performance is in the mid range of laptop chips and still well suited for even demanding tasks.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The R5 PRO 230 has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the R5 PRO 230 is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB6 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT816 TOPS INT8
Chip AI80 TOPS INT831 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
L1 Cache384 KB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 117     median: 117 (58%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1083     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20600     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2011     median: 2018 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791.5 (86%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8343     median: 8711 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3240     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 188.8     avg: 292.4     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 34.85     avg: 39     median: 39.5 (51%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8437     avg: 8639     median: 8655 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48553     avg: 53517     median: 53766 (39%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 89081     avg: 97658     median: 98125 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15381     avg: 15748     median: 15797 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 75.7     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.742 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 2.9     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4504     median: 4759 (8%)     max: 4859 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78426     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6182     median: 6181 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.9     avg: 167.2     median: 169.8 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300     avg: 309.4     median: 306 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.4     median: 26.2 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (47%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.1     avg: 15.5     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 238.3     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 155.8     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16239     median: 16471.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 18.6     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 22.248 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73048     median: 75346 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20565     median: 20809.5 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 62767     median: 63723.5 (52%)     max: 76578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 64270     median: 66513.5 (54%)     max: 77375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 63261     median: 64870 (52%)     max: 76518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19505     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 30085     median: 30411 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10462     median: 10533 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2890     median: 2891.5 (67%)     max: 2965 Points
2503 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14682     median: 15051 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
9776 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2751     median: 2764 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12289     avg: 13856     median: 14161 (58%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2091     median: 2098 (71%)     max: 2175 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14344     median: 14516 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1935     median: 1934.5 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14250     median: 14282 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 7969     median: 7818 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52918     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 307.8     avg: 437.1     median: 434 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (81%)     max: 125813 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.2     avg: 254     median: 256.5 (67%)     max: 345 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 308.7     median: 316.5 (57%)     max: 363 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1307     avg: 1758     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 2040 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 89.1     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.6     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.66     avg: 8.6     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.4     avg: 9.3     median: 9.2 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 → 76% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 03:44:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19166 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765593894s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.034s ... 0.044s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19166 +0.001s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 19166 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.089s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)