Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-13500HX

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-13500HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13500HX

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading. The P-Cores clock between 2.5 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

The average 13500HX in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13900H, Core i9-13905H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption is 157 W and the Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.

The i5-13500HX is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core i5-13500HX
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HX
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX « 1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
6 x 4.7 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1964
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500HX
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
98 Points (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
887 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 18235     avg: 18582     median: 18334 (17%)     max: 19176 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1731     median: 1730.5 (73%)     max: 1772 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 648     avg: 674     median: 679 (74%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 6978     avg: 7123     median: 7021 (17%)     max: 7371 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 2856     avg: 2894     median: 2863 (18%)     max: 2964 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 242     avg: 252.3     median: 252 (70%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
33.7 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
3.1 Points (75%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
8980 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
58608 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
400.2 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
10.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 68923     avg: 71289     median: 71243 (41%)     max: 73701 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 5377     avg: 5652     median: 5728 (68%)     max: 5850 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 20.5     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 310     avg: 328.3     median: 336 (4%)     max: 339 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 188     median: 193 (1%)     max: 193 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.4512     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4891 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 13265     avg: 14596     median: 14596 (31%)     max: 15927 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
408 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
78386 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 22848     avg: 23667     median: 23435 (58%)     max: 24719 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
101155 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (69%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 20276     avg: 20751     median: 20750.5 (52%)     max: 21225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 28766     avg: 30450     median: 30600 (55%)     max: 31983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 12867     avg: 13931     median: 14159 (60%)     max: 14766 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
2478 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
13404 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1688     avg: 1732     median: 1730 (68%)     max: 1779 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 12683     avg: 13344     median: 13581 (24%)     max: 13767 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 521     avg: 539     median: 547 (1%)     max: 550 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (66%)     max: 96330 Points
90065 Points (66%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 240     avg: 246.7     median: 243 (67%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 255     avg: 280.7     median: 293 (53%)     max: 294 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1701     avg: 1833     median: 1832.5 (69%)     max: 1964 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 128.6     avg: 132     median: 132 (23%)     max: 135.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
179.2 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 16     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (12%)     max: 18.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
13.4 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500HX → 102% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 10. 10:06:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14667 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754813191s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.022s ... 0.033s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14667 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#10 got single benchmarks 14667 +0.008s ... 0.045s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.103s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)