Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (73%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (75%)     max: 270 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (43%)     max: 18690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (76%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (69%)     max: 91831 Points
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (70%)     max: 96182 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 88% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 02. 04:39:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751423965s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.031s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#10 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.008s ... 0.055s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.112s

#13 return log +0.006s ... 0.118s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)