Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900X

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 12 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 4.7 (base) up to 5.7 GHz (single core boost). When all 12 cores are fully loaded, 5.1 GHz is the max. clock speed. The 7900X is the second fastest Ryzen at launch, only bested by the Ryzen 9 7950X with 4 more cores.

The performance of the R9 7900X is clearly better than the old Ryzen 9 5900X thanks to the improved architecture and modern 5nm process. Compared to Intels Raptor Lake Core i9-13700K the single-core performance is slightly lower and the multi-core performance slightly faster. The gaming performance is a bit lower, and is on average only on par with the Core i5-13600K and also lower than the old Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7950X3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series with 16 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. With the release in February 2023, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is AMD's fastest consumer processor and the new top model of the 7000 series. The CPU cores clock from 4.2 GHz (base clock) up to 5.7 GHz (single core Turbo). In addition, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a CCD with 8 cores that can access the fast 3D V-cache, which offers considerably more gaming performance.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is consistently excellent in all applications tested. In addition, AMD was again able to increase the single-thread performance compared to the non-X3D models. Nevertheless, the lower base clock compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X means that a small drop in multi-thread performance has to be accepted.

The internal structure of the processor is comparable to the previous AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is also still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters with 8 cores each. However, the two CCDs differ significantly from each other because one offers the fast 3D V-Cache, which primarily improves gaming performance. In testing, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D was able to put the Intel Core i9-13900K in second place and is the fastest gaming CPU on the market at the time of testing. 

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is an extremely energy-efficient CPU with up to 162 watts (PPT) and is significantly more frugal under load than an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max. 230 watts).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD Ryzen 9 7900XAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Raphael (Zen4)Raphael (Zen4)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X « 4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D « 4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz4700 - 5600 MHz4200 - 5700 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB768 KB1 MB
L2 Cache0 MB12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache96 MB64 MB128 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 2416 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP162 Watt170 Watt120 Watt
Transistors6570 MillionCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million13140 Million
Technology5 nm5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V5 nm
Die Size1x 71 mm² (CCD) + 121 mm² (I/O) mm22x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2263 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C95 °C89 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)AM5 (LGA 1718)AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$449 U.S.$699 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
48.3 pt (67%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900X
57.1 pt (79%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7950X3D
61.1 pt (85%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17387     median: 17387 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
min: 28925     avg: 29289     median: 29300 (27%)     max: 29628 Points
36291 Points (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1713     avg: 1767     median: 1766.5 (75%)     max: 1820 Points
min: 2012     avg: 2020     median: 2016.5 (86%)     max: 2039 Points
2053 Points (87%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (76%)     max: 709 Points
min: 780     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (87%)     max: 787 Points
795 Points (88%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
min: 11353     avg: 11474     median: 11471.5 (28%)     max: 11623 Points
14188 Points (35%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
min: 4753     avg: 4818     median: 4820.5 (30%)     max: 4856 Points
5974 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (85%)     max: 291 Points
min: 319     avg: 322.2     median: 323 (97%)     max: 325 Points
326 Points (98%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
min: 53.91     avg: 54.6     median: 54.7 (71%)     max: 55.26 Points
64.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (85%)
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (95%)     max: 3.85 Points
3.9 Points (96%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
min: 8465     avg: 8658     median: 8623 (52%)     max: 8858 Points
16551 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
min: 67036     avg: 68658     median: 68579.5 (50%)     max: 70741 Points
138015 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (65%)
min: 121250     avg: 126872     median: 125768 (87%)     max: 134469 Points
72361 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
min: 16151     avg: 16234     median: 16246 (20%)     max: 16338 Points
8853 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
min: 39.576     avg: 40.4     median: 40.3 (0%)     max: 41.122 s
33.9 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
min: 1.781     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.872 s
2 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
17225 Points (27%)
15779 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
min: 124975     avg: 127080     median: 127195 (73%)     max: 129087 MIPS
159341 MIPS (91%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (94%)     max: 8235 MIPS
min: 8252     avg: 8280     median: 8269 (99%)     max: 8345 MIPS
8321 MIPS (99%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (59%)
241 fps (84%)
265.5 fps (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (79%)
376 fps (87%)
392.5 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
min: 36.2     avg: 36.8     median: 36.9 (65%)     max: 37.1 fps
42.4 fps (75%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
2.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
4.2 GB/s (72%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
14.8 GB/s (39%)
26.9 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 165     avg: 166.4     median: 166 (2%)     max: 168 Seconds
133 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
min: 105     avg: 106.2     median: 106 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
86 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
min: 0.3643     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3758 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
min: 20439     avg: 21223     median: 21284 (45%)     max: 21659 Points
20279 Points (43%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
6.1 s (1%)
6.1 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
13.3 s (1%)
13.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
313.4 s (1%)
305.1 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (85%)
min: 82063     avg: 100438     median: 102019 (89%)     max: 102765 Points
99321 Points (87%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (89%)     max: 35127 Points
min: 26455     avg: 27800     median: 27731 (75%)     max: 28963 Points
36991 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
min: 96003     avg: 102745     median: 103232 (84%)     max: 105350 Points
86389 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
min: 97281     avg: 102964     median: 103220 (84%)     max: 106230 Points
86306 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (77%)
min: 94657     avg: 102993     median: 101826 (86%)     max: 108551 Points
87725 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
min: 25631     avg: 26260     median: 26310.5 (67%)     max: 26732 Points
26168 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31839     median: 31839 (57%)     max: 33345 Points
min: 40436     avg: 42329     median: 42325 (75%)     max: 43200 Points
44787 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11975     avg: 13037     median: 13036.5 (55%)     max: 14098 Points
min: 13634     avg: 15940     median: 15959.5 (67%)     max: 16721 Points
17206 Points (73%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2634 Points (71%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14288 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (81%)     max: 2027 Points
min: 2274     avg: 2290     median: 2294 (97%)     max: 2297 Points
2311 Points (98%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 19987     avg: 20553     median: 20667.5 (37%)     max: 20799 Points
24343 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
min: 2183     avg: 2195     median: 2196 (10%)     max: 2201 Points
2183 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
min: 19975     avg: 20532     median: 20658 (65%)     max: 20765 Points
23720 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
min: 9193     avg: 9260     median: 9275 (93%)     max: 9311 Points
9240 Points (92%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (60%)
min: 74731     avg: 76662     median: 77033 (85%)     max: 77769 Points
87922 Points (96%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
min: 431     avg: 438     median: 440 (1%)     max: 441 ms
437 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (81%)
min: 300     avg: 305.8     median: 304.5 (88%)     max: 314 Points
313 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (74%)
min: 371     avg: 383.8     median: 383 (80%)     max: 395 Points
383 Points (80%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (85%)
min: 2315     avg: 2370     median: 2370 (91%)     max: 2408 Points
2193 Points (84%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
319 Watt (55%)
276 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
313 Watt (57%)
273 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
94.1 Watt (62%)
118.4 Watt (78%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
15.5 Points per Watt (12%)
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900X → 120% n=48

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D → 134% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 00:06:12

#0 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14608 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15000 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.016s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.011s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14608 +0.015s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 14608 +0.046s ... 0.113s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15000 +0.011s ... 0.125s

#12 got single benchmarks 15000 +0.008s ... 0.132s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.132s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.448s ... 0.581s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.581s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)