Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i3-10110U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3500U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 5 3500C, but the specifications (and performance) are the same.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3500U in our database matches the Intel Core i7-1065G7 in multi-thread performance to be an OK lower mid-range option, as of early 2021.

The Honor MagicBook 14 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3500U that we know of. It can be up to 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to set to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The chip is manufactured on a 12 nm process for subpar, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-10110U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10110U

The Intel Core i3-10110U is a dual-core SoC of the Comet Lake family. The i3 is designed for use in ultraportable laptops of the more affordable flavor as well as mini-PCs. It was announced in August 2019. Just like the other Comet Lake processors, this Core i3 features several advantages over the outgoing Whiskey Lake family including support for faster memory (up to LPDDR4-2933).

Core i3-10110U runs at 2.1 GHz to 4.1 GHz (only 3.7 GHz are reachable when under multi-thread load). Hyper-Threading support is enabled for 4 processing threads in total.

Performance

The average 10110U in our database shapes up to be a decent entry-level CPU, as of late 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and also the Core i3-8145U. While not a whole lot faster than Intel's more affordable Pentium Gold and Pentium Silver chips, the i3 will still let you run most apps with virtually no annoying slowdowns.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 runs at up to 1,000 MHz. What makes this specific iGPU peculiar is that it only has 23 Execution Units at its disposal, not the 24 EUs typical for a UHD Graphics 620. Otherwise, it's the usual affair with 4K monitor support (up to three displays at the same time) and a hardware video decoder that's friends with VP9, AVC, HEVC but not the newer AV1 video codec.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the SoC.

The i3-10110U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processees for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 GHz to 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics adapter with 10 CUs (640 shaders) clocked at up to 1,400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 7 3700C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3700U in our database is a solid mid-range CPU as of early 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores matching those of the Core i5-10310U and the Core i5-1035G7 (the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is found close nearby as well). This Ryzen 7 is good for more than just binge-watching Netflix and writing e-mails. Just do not expect it to be as fast as a Core i7-11800H.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the ThinkPad E595 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3700U that we know of. It can be up to 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This can be changed by a laptop manufacturer to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured on a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3500UIntel Core i3-10110UAMD Ryzen 7 3700U
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Comet Lake-UPicasso-U (Zen+)
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Comet LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U « 2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz2100 - 4100 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketFP5BGA1528FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3500U
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10110U
26 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3700U
24.6 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
55.5 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
206 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1910     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1031     avg: 1033     median: 1032.5 (43%)     max: 1034 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 317     avg: 354.3     median: 364 (40%)     max: 372 Points
min: 400     avg: 402     median: 401 (44%)     max: 405 Points
min: 285     avg: 339.2     median: 343 (37%)     max: 368 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1063     avg: 1436     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1540 Points
min: 743     avg: 808     median: 753 (2%)     max: 928 Points
min: 1047     avg: 1344     median: 1499 (4%)     max: 1560 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 482     avg: 642     median: 650 (4%)     max: 682 Points
min: 314     avg: 351.8     median: 321 (2%)     max: 405 Points
min: 537     avg: 648     median: 672 (4%)     max: 683 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 131     avg: 142.4     median: 143 (40%)     max: 147 Points
min: 129     avg: 159     median: 162 (45%)     max: 172 Points
min: 127     avg: 138     median: 139 (39%)     max: 146 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.6 Points (10%)
3.6 Points (5%)
min: 5.02     avg: 7     median: 7.6 (10%)     max: 7.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (39%)
1.9 Points (44%)
min: 1.23     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (38%)     max: 1.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4542     avg: 4556     median: 4557.5 (28%)     max: 4565 Points
min: 6311     avg: 6349     median: 6349 (38%)     max: 6387 Points
min: 4045     avg: 4411     median: 4410.5 (27%)     max: 4776 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13249     avg: 16322     median: 17230.5 (12%)     max: 17578 Points
min: 11023     avg: 11205     median: 11204.5 (8%)     max: 11386 Points
min: 12881     avg: 15461     median: 15461 (11%)     max: 18041 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
14261 Points (9%)
min: 27166     avg: 27205     median: 27205 (17%)     max: 27244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8184 Points (10%)
min: 7765     avg: 7767     median: 7767 (9%)     max: 7769 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
368.2 s (4%)
min: 523     avg: 533     median: 533 (6%)     max: 543 s
450.4 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
12.9 s (3%)
min: 13.92     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
13.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2455 Points (4%)
min: 1695     avg: 2156     median: 2156 (3%)     max: 2617 Points
2392 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 15825     avg: 16929     median: 17024.5 (10%)     max: 17508 MIPS
min: 9858     avg: 10292     median: 10291.5 (6%)     max: 10725 MIPS
min: 12738     avg: 15166     median: 15386.5 (9%)     max: 17153 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3502     avg: 3541     median: 3538 (42%)     max: 3580 MIPS
min: 4038     avg: 4154     median: 4153.5 (49%)     max: 4269 MIPS
min: 3038     avg: 3423     median: 3492.5 (41%)     max: 3668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
39.2 fps (13%)
min: 20.55     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (7%)     max: 20.7 fps
27.1 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
134.8 fps (31%)
min: 106.5     avg: 110.1     median: 110.1 (25%)     max: 113.6 fps
104.8 fps (24%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.35     avg: 3.9     median: 4 (7%)     max: 4.15 fps
min: 2.72     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (5%)     max: 3.12 fps
min: 2.76     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (6%)     max: 3.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (13%)
min: 0.21     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
min: 0.346     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (6%)     max: 0.394 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.4 GB/s (11%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
3.8 GB/s (10%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 680     avg: 704     median: 694 (5%)     max: 796 Seconds
min: 1174     avg: 1280     median: 1279.5 (9%)     max: 1385 Seconds
min: 671     avg: 797     median: 703 (5%)     max: 1018 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.734     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.804 sec
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.76 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5044     avg: 5951     median: 5950.5 (13%)     max: 6857 Points
4595 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
min: 9.404     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 9.446 s
12.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.8 s (1%)
min: 21.75     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 22.1 s
29.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
697 s (3%)
min: 529     avg: 539     median: 538.5 (2%)     max: 548 s
748 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
18229 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5213     avg: 6267     median: 6402.5 (16%)     max: 6967 Points
min: 3863     avg: 4262     median: 4157 (10%)     max: 4765 Points
min: 5060     avg: 5955     median: 5416 (13%)     max: 7250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29562     avg: 32942     median: 30254 (25%)     max: 48997 Points
min: 35890     avg: 39828     median: 40101 (33%)     max: 43494 Points
min: 30752     avg: 31840     median: 31238.5 (25%)     max: 34132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30656     avg: 34184     median: 31241.5 (25%)     max: 49067 Points
min: 34543     avg: 38846     median: 39392 (32%)     max: 42604 Points
min: 30487     avg: 32042     median: 31393 (25%)     max: 34896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26201     avg: 36686     median: 32088 (27%)     max: 54995 Points
min: 42440     avg: 47299     median: 47408 (39%)     max: 52050 Points
min: 24397     avg: 31189     median: 30959.5 (26%)     max: 38440 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5217     avg: 6435     median: 6613 (17%)     max: 7132 Points
min: 3489     avg: 3565     median: 3579 (9%)     max: 3627 Points
min: 2957     avg: 4954     median: 4978 (13%)     max: 7033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7496     avg: 9199     median: 9380 (17%)     max: 10054 Points
min: 5122     avg: 5365     median: 5285 (9%)     max: 5687 Points
min: 6380     avg: 8272     median: 8698.5 (16%)     max: 9457 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2450     avg: 2660     median: 2696 (11%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 1745     avg: 3394     median: 3394 (14%)     max: 5043 Points
min: 2012     avg: 2427     median: 2224 (9%)     max: 3044 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1101 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
3324 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 777     avg: 886     median: 902 (35%)     max: 909 Points
min: 957     avg: 987     median: 987 (39%)     max: 1017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2543     avg: 3097     median: 3157 (6%)     max: 3269 Points
min: 2017     avg: 2026     median: 2025.5 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 772     avg: 880     median: 896 (4%)     max: 913 Points
1002 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2599     avg: 3035     median: 3118.5 (10%)     max: 3244 Points
2034 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3400     avg: 3785     median: 3893 (39%)     max: 3924 Points
4455 Points (44%)
min: 3445     avg: 3785     median: 3843.5 (38%)     max: 4009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10099     avg: 11388     median: 11783 (12%)     max: 12171 Points
8289 Points (8%)
min: 8907     avg: 10275     median: 10542 (11%)     max: 11107 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3669 Points (41%)
4397 Points (49%)
3247 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10597 Points (15%)
7865 Points (11%)
9117 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9503     avg: 12182     median: 13040 (23%)     max: 13145 Points
7335 Points (13%)
10238 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3258     avg: 3405     median: 3442.5 (67%)     max: 3478 Points
3470 Points (68%)
3003 Points (59%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
13873 Points (22%)
7635 Points (12%)
10881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3682 Points (55%)
3765 Points (56%)
3354 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6193 Points (50%)
6421 Points (52%)
7277 Points (59%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6118 Points (55%)
6567 Points (60%)
5738 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16467 Points (32%)
8305 Points (16%)
12851 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
12317 Points (25%)
8126 Points (16%)
10434 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11917 Points (31%)
7706 Points (20%)
10025 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1101     avg: 1272     median: 1274.5 (1%)     max: 1693 ms
min: 1220     avg: 1244     median: 1244 (1%)     max: 1268 ms
min: 1285     avg: 1321     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1405 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
128.8 ms (1%)
95.3 ms (1%)
147.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 19083     avg: 26794     median: 27809 (21%)     max: 32938 Points
29833 Points (23%)
min: 23657     avg: 26597     median: 27490 (21%)     max: 28301 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145     avg: 154     median: 148 (27%)     max: 172 Points
min: 145     avg: 164     median: 164 (29%)     max: 183 Points
min: 152     avg: 154     median: 154 (28%)     max: 156 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24     avg: 33.7     median: 34.7 (6%)     max: 42.5 Watt
46.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.5     avg: 37     median: 38 (7%)     max: 38.5 Watt
24.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 18.1     median: 18.1 (13%)     max: 18.9 Points per Watt
12.9 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3500U → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110U → 88% n=47

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3700U → 91% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 19. 11:46:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11161 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11463 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11141 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752918412s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 10:28:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11161 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 11161 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11463 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#11 got single benchmarks 11463 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11141 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 11141 +0.016s ... 0.041s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.079s ... 0.12s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)