Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000

The Nvidia Quadro P4000 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. There is currently no consumer counterpart and the GPU is sitting between the Quadro P3000 (GTX 1060) and Quadro P5000 (GTX 1070). It is equipped with 1792 shaders and should therefore use the same GP104 chip from the P5000 (2048 shaders). It has 8 GB GDDR-VRAM at the same bandwidth and has the similar 100-Watt TGP according to Nvidia.

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a high-end DirectX 11-compatible graphics solution for laptops, consisting of two GeForce GTX 965M. Each card has a 28 nm GM204 GPU based on the Maxwell architecture, which is the same chip as found on the GTX 980M, GTX 970M as well as several desktop cards. The clocks for the SLI-setup are usually identical to a single GTX 965M (924 MHz GPU, 1250 MHz memory).

With SLI, each card renders a single frame (AFR mode). Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30 fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g., irregular delays between sequential frames).

Architecture

GM204 is based on Nvidia's Maxwell architecture, which replaces the previous Kepler generation. Among other changes, Nvidia have restructured the streaming multi processors (SMM) in order to increase workload and efficiency. Now each SMM contains only 128 shader units and 8 TMUs, which is noticeably less than an equivalent Kepler GPU. The GM204 features four GPCs, and each consists of four SMMs. But, in the GeForce GTX 965M, Nvidia have deactivated 8 of 16 SMMs. As a result, only 1024 shader ALUs and 64 TMUs are active. In addition, there are 32 ROPs in two clusters with 16 units each.

The memory interface has a bandwidth of 128-bits (2x 64 bit) for each of the two GPUs. Thanks to an improved compression algorithm, the connection to the GDDR5 memory should be significantly more efficient per MHz. Furthermore, the L1 (96 KB per SMM) and L2 caches (2 MB) have been significantly increased to lower the needed bandwidth. Compared to the mid-range GM107, the newer and larger GM204 has several additional features and changes. Aside from the improved polymorphic engine in the SSMs, it is also the first Nvidia chip to support DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1.

Performance

With good driver support, SLI almost doubles the performance of a single card. In this case, the GTX 965M SLI beats a single GeForce GTX 980M by about 10 percent. Therefore, the GTX 965M SLI is powerful enough to run even the most demanding games with highest details, AA/AF and/or resolutions exceeding FullHD.

Features

Most of the features are identical to the GeForce GTX 800M series. With the GTX 965M, there can be up to 4 active displays, but this will likely decrease due to Optimus. Displays can be connected with a maximum resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels via DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 2.0 (no HDCP @ 4K). HD audio formats like Dolby True HD and DTS HD can be sent to a compatible receiver as bitstream. As with previous models, 3D Vision is not supported with Optimus.

The video processor VP6 supports the usual formats like H.264 and can also decode and encode H.265 with a resolution of up to 4K via the NVENC API (hybrid H.265 decoder, not fully fixed function). Several parallel streams, such as picture-in-picture in a Blu-Ray movie, are also possible.

Further features of the GTX 900M series, which are also partly supported by older cards, include Battery Boost (longer battery life during gaming), Shadowplay (recording of gaming videos up to 4K60p and 130 Mbit/s) and Gamestream (game streaming on Shield console). More information on these features are available here.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of each GeForce GTX 965M including its MXM board and memory should be around 70 W, leading to a total TDP of about 140 W. Therefore, the SLI setup can only be used in very large and heavy gaming notebooks with powerful cooling systems. Under low load, dynamic clock rates help the GPUs to save energy.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 900M Series
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
GeForce GTX 980M SLI compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M SLI compare 2560 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz2x 192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M SLI 2048 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 980M compare 1536 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M compare 1280 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M compare 1024 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 960M compare 640 @ 1.1 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 950M compare 640 @ 0.91 - 1.12 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 5000 MHz
CodenameN17E-Q3
ArchitecturePascalMaxwell
Pipelines1792 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz924 - 950 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6006 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB2x 4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption73.4 Watt
technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement11.01.2017 05.01.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Transistors0 Billion

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P4000
5.6 pt (17%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce GTX 965M SLI
4.7 pt (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3825 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3960 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
369407 Points (42%)
250259 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
73221 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
18726 Points (20%)
22188 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
53834 Points (14%)
51182 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
10158 Points (18%)
7815 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
12259 Points (14%)
10207 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
81998 Points (10%)
73450 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
12346 Points (17%)
11638 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
15433 Points (13%)
14428 Points (12%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
36260 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
42370 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3DMark 06
29155 Points (38%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
53 fps (32%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
49.9 fps (28%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
50.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
19.7 fps (23%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.8 fps (44%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.2 fps (56%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
59.2 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
48.4 fps (25%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
117.1 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
83.1 fps (12%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
67.2 fps (15%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
39.4 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.9 fps (21%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
10.3 fps (9%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
97.1 fps (39%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
115.2 fps (19%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
93.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6831 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
6789 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
105.6 fps (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
68.4 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
107.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
116.3 fps (7%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
209.8 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
318 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
408.4 fps (24%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1114 fps (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1847 Samples/s (8%)
1513 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3564 Samples/s (6%)
2699 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8609 Points (9%)
3818 Points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
80.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P4000 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI → 86% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P4000:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
61.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
58.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
54  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
66.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
55.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
45.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
43.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P4000:
119.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
112.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
91  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
87.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
115.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
103.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
76.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
65.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
122.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
116.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
89.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
85.7  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
40  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
27  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
159.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
113.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
77.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
41.1  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
105.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
71.9  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
72  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
49.8  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
115  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
58.8  fps
high 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
89.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
153.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
106.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
96.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
84.5  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
84.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
60.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
236.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
184.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
151.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
63.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
67.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
61.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
59.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
44.9  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
85.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
56.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P4000:
196.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
174.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro P4000:
162.4  fps
102%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
165.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P4000:
96  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
93.1  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
145  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
76.2  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
244.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
117.6  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
64.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
57.3  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
159.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
62.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro P4000 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI → 99%

NVIDIA Quadro P4000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III70.361.658.854
Civilization VI66.755.245.1343.7
Doom119.5112.49187.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider115.9103.276.865.5
Star Wars Battlefront122.5116.489.285.7
The Witcher 3159.7113.677.241.09
GRID: Autosport153.8106.396.984.5
Total War: Rome II236.7184.1151.463.3
Company of Heroes 267.661.159.744.94
BioShock Infinite196.9174.4162.496
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
5

1
7
2

3
5
2

4
6






NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Batman: Arkham Knight694027
Battlefield Hardline105.271.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition7249.8
F1 201411590
Ryse: Son of Rome61.258.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor89.569.2
Thief84.760.1
Metro: Last Light85.856.9
BioShock Infinite165.393.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm14576.2
Tomb Raider244.5117.6
Guild Wars 264.557.3
Sleeping Dogs159.962.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps





1

1
8
4
1
4
8






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 00:20:01

#0 checking url part for id 7666 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6375 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.122s ... 0.123s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.123s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.123s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7666 +0.045s ... 0.169s

#8 got single benchmarks 7666 +0.01s ... 0.178s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6375 +0.017s ... 0.195s

#10 got single benchmarks 6375 +0.008s ... 0.203s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.203s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.264s ... 0.467s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.467s

#14 Got 67 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.474s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.474s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.489s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.052s ... 0.541s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.541s

#19 return log +0.043s ... 0.584s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)