NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

The Nvidia Quadro M4000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 1280 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M. The Quadro M4000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K4100M (Kepler-based). The M4000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K4100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The clock speeds of the Quadro M4000M are very similar to the GTX 970M based on the same chip. The base clock is slightly higher with 975 versus 924 MHz but the Boost speed is lower at 1013 versus 1038 MHz. Therefore, with good cooling the GTX 970M should be slightly faster. Compared to the Quadro line-up, it is the second fastest Quadro card in 2015 and therefore clearly faster than the old Quadro K4100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M4000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M4000M is rated at the same TGP of 100 Watt as the M5000M and older K5100M/K4100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q1
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
640 - 1280 -
Core991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz
Memory5000 MHz5012 MHz
Bus128 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Memory4096 MB4096 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0DirectX 12_1, 5.0
Transistors1870 Million5200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size
Introduced13.01.2017 02.10.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
11.7 pt (12%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
1290 Points (9%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
240298 Points (45%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
42129 Points (6%)
176003 Points (24%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (20%)     max: 17884 Points
min: 13452     avg: 17686     median: 17686 (27%)     max: 21920 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
49204 Points (25%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (14%)     max: 3900 Points
6937 Points (24%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (10%)     max: 4165 Points
7723 Points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
63463 Points (8%)
218874 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (16%)     max: 5516 points
min: 9042     avg: 9296     median: 9295.5 (27%)     max: 9549 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (10%)     max: 5515 points
10259 points (20%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
27.7 fps (17%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (15%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (11%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
388 Points (1%)
5686 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 223%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
183%
Quadro M4000M:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
194%
Quadro M4000M:
55  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
201%
Quadro M4000M:
48  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
202%
Quadro M4000M:
20  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
Quadro M4000M:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
146%
Quadro M4000M:
196  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
152%
Quadro M4000M:
181  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
189%
Quadro M4000M:
85  fps
Quadro M1200:
»
Quadro M4000M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 181%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)