ARM Mali-G52 MP1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.
The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.
The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 Qualcomm Adreno 685 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Bifrost Pipelines 1 - unified Core Speed 800 (Boost) MHz Shared Memory no yes yes technology 12 nm 7 nm 5 nm Date of Announcement 29.07.2020 06.12.2018 06.12.2018 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com API DirectX 12 DirectX 12 Power Consumption 7 Watt 7 Watt
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 13089 avg: 14037 median: 13379.5 (2%) max: 16301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 950 avg: 1287 median: 1275 (6%) max: 2142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 834 avg: 1165 median: 1143.5 (3%) max: 2001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 605 avg: 893 median: 915 (5%) max: 1516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 508 avg: 766 median: 787.5 (2%) max: 1339 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 410 avg: 470.6 median: 426 (0%) max: 716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 111 avg: 126.7 median: 117 (0%) max: 181 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6 avg: 0.9 median: 0.9 (0%) max: 0.96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4 avg: 2.1 median: 2.1 (0%) max: 3.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 3.9 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (0%) max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.2 avg: 5.9 median: 6 (1%) max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.6 avg: 9.4 median: 9.4 (0%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 16 (1%) max: 26 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 19 avg: 24.8 median: 24 (0%) max: 42 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 0 avg: 16041 median: 22462 (3%) max: 25274 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 9.57 avg: 12.7 median: 12.7 (0%) max: 15.81 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3562 avg: 15210 median: 15410 (15%) max: 24108 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1293 avg: 10223 median: 11400 (20%) max: 16564 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 3.3 median: 2.7 (1%) max: 7.07 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 15. 23:47:11
#0 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.131s ... 0.132s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.132s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.132s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.039s ... 0.171s
#9 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.034s ... 0.206s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.002s ... 0.208s
#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.006s ... 0.214s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.02s ... 0.234s
#13 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.011s ... 0.245s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.245s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.17s ... 0.415s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.415s
#17 Got 78 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.435s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.435s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.442s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.03s ... 0.473s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.473s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.475s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)