Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel HD Graphics 510

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (GT3e) is an integrated graphics card and the fastest GPU of the Broadwell generation. It is built into several high-end CPUs specified at 47 W TDP. The so-called GT3e GPU offers a fast eDRAM cache as well as 48 EUs (Execution Units) and therefore somewhat more shader power than the previous Iris Pro Graphics 5200. The clock range depends on the model it is built into (up to 1150 MHz with Turbo Boost).

Architecture and Features

Broadwell features a GPU based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which has been optimized in various aspects compared to the previous Gen7.5 (Haswell). Inter alia, the shader arrays called "subslice" have been reorganized and now offer 8 Execution Units (EUs) each. Three subslices form a "slice" for a total of 24 EUs. Combined with other improvements such as larger L1 caches and an optimized frontend, the integrated GPU has become faster and more efficient than its predecessor.

The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 represents the high-end "GT3e" version of the Broadwell GPU family and consists of two slices with 48 EUs in total. In addition, there is also a fast eDRAM cache (128 MB), which can be found only on the Iris Pro.

All Broadwell GPUs support OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 11_1). The video engine can now decode H.265 using both fixed function hardware as well as available GPU shaders. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz) or HDMI 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz). HDMI 2.0, however, is not supported.

Performance

Depending on the benchmark, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 performs similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 750M or GeForce 940M. Many games of 2014/2015 can be played fluently in WXGA resolution (1366 x 768) and medium detail settings. However, very demanding games such as The Witcher 3 will require lower resolutions and/or details.

Power Consumption

Utilizing a new 14 nm FinFET process, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is specified at 47 W TDP (entire chip including CPU, GPU and memory controller) and therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks. The TDP is flexible and can be further reduced (37 W), which has a significant impact on performance.

Intel HD Graphics 510

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 510

The Intel HD Graphics 510 (GT1) is an integrated graphics unit, which can be found in low-end ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processors of the Skylake generation. This "GT1" version of the Skylake GPU offers 12 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 950 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 510 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Performance

Depending on various factors like memory configuration, the HD Graphics 510 should perform sligthly below the older HD Graphics 4400 and will handle modern games (as of 2015) only in lowest settings (if it does at all).

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The HD Graphics 510 can be found in mobile processors specified at 15 W TDP and is therefore suited for compact laptops and ultrabooks.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel HD Graphics 510
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.3 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 6100 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 5100 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT3eSkylake GT1
ArchitectureGen. 8 BroadwellGen. 9 Skylake
Pipelines48 - unified12 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz300 - 950 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus WidtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2015 01.09.2015
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics 6200GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-5775C4 x 3300 MHz, 65 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5950HQ4 x 2900 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5850HQ4 x 2700 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-6198DU2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 4405U2 x 2100 MHz, 15 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz950 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 510
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
43274 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100535 Points (13%)
26846 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12893     avg: 13059     median: 13058.5 (14%)     max: 13224 Points
4721 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 15361     avg: 15388     median: 15387.5 (4%)     max: 15414 Points
5664 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1662     avg: 1685     median: 1685 (3%)     max: 1708 Points
570 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1704     avg: 1737     median: 1736.5 (2%)     max: 1769 Points
621 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
62653 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3094 Points (4%)
985 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2766 Points (2%)
847 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3798 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3125 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark 06
7253 Points (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
9.3 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
10.8 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
13.5 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
7348 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
17.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
35.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
51.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
64.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 510
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
121.9 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
167 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
302 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
500 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 510 → 33% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
18.3  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
70.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
41.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
24.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
9.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
13.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
7.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
11.1  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
25  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
11  fps
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
48.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
29.2  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
38.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
25.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
66.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
41.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
110.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
19.3  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
30.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
26.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
31.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
22.2  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
72  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
47  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
173.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
32.2  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
135.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
32.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
22.5  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
39  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
20.1  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
17.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
52.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
23.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
16.2  fps
Intel HD Graphics 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Resident Evil 718.3
Titanfall 219.915.4
Farming Simulator 1770.641.3
Civilization VI24.59.4
The Division13.47.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider11.17
Rainbow Six Siege2515.9
Anno 220519.911
World of Warships48.729.2
Metal Gear Solid V38.925.2
Dota 2 Reborn66.241.8
Dirt Rally110.419.3
GTA V30.926.8
Battlefield Hardline31.522.2
F1 20147247
Sims 4173.732.2
GRID: Autosport135.532.8
Battlefield 433.422.515.9
BioShock Infinite3920.117.7
Tomb Raider52.723.916.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
7
4
2
14
5

3











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 00:01:19

#0 checking url part for id 5947 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6475 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.085s ... 0.086s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.086s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.086s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5947 +0.029s ... 0.115s

#8 got single benchmarks 5947 +0.009s ... 0.124s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6475 +0.018s ... 0.143s

#10 got single benchmarks 6475 +0.015s ... 0.158s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.158s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.174s ... 0.332s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.332s

#14 Got 42 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.335s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.335s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.018s ... 0.353s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.049s ... 0.402s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.402s

#19 return log +0.045s ... 0.447s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)