Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP3 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP3

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and uses 3 clusters (hence the MC3/MP3 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP3 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U / Realme 7 5G) is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 680ARM Mali-G57 MP3Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesnoyes
APIDirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology7 nm7 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018 03.07.2020 07.05.2021
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines3 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 800U8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 29682     avg: 32144     median: 32143.5 (4%)     max: 34605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3377     avg: 4000     median: 4032.5 (18%)     max: 4467 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3497     avg: 4324     median: 4247.5 (9%)     max: 5012 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2551     avg: 2908     median: 2783.5 (14%)     max: 3291 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6172     median: 6286 (31%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2375     avg: 2831     median: 2656 (8%)     max: 3304 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7065     median: 7023 (21%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1207     avg: 1337     median: 1226 (1%)     max: 1586 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3143 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 331     avg: 393.6     median: 366 (0%)     max: 461 Points
min: 825     avg: 834     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (3%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
min: 7     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 8.1 fps
min: 15     avg: 16.6     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.9     median: 18 (1%)     max: 22 fps
min: 41     avg: 46     median: 47 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 16.6     median: 17 (2%)     max: 20 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 29.4     median: 27.5 (1%)     max: 35 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 43.3     median: 42.5 (2%)     max: 51 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (5%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP3
min: 57     avg: 72     median: 70 (1%)     max: 83 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 84032     avg: 91910     median: 90626 (11%)     max: 101071 Points
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (22%)     max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 28.5     avg: 35.2     median: 33.7 (0%)     max: 44.63 fps
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (0%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2496     avg: 2535     median: 2498 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2794     median: 2738 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9293     avg: 21578     median: 25659 (26%)     max: 29783 Points
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3448     avg: 16034     median: 22192 (39%)     max: 22461 Points
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.42     avg: 3.5     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 4.98 Watt
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 50% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 106% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP3:
39 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP3:
40  fps
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
61  fps
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps
ARM Mali-G57 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift6045
Armajet50
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 261
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


3
2

2







Qualcomm Adreno 644lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 04. 23:41:52

#0 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10571 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.136s ... 0.137s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.138s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.138s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.036s ... 0.174s

#9 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.012s ... 0.185s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10571 +0.002s ... 0.187s

#11 got single benchmarks 10571 +0.027s ... 0.214s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.216s

#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.013s ... 0.229s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.229s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.125s ... 0.354s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.354s

#17 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.366s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.366s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.37s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.386s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.386s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.388s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)