Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12
technology7 nm8 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement02.12.2020 15.12.2015 06.12.2018
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.1 pt (3%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.05576 -95%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.0842 -92%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.192 -82%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.097
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 2936%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (20%)
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (37%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (29%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7991     avg: 8422     median: 8055 (72%)     max: 9221 Points
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10111     avg: 11212     median: 10261 (62%)     max: 13263 Points
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 6140     avg: 6868     median: 6868 (34%)     max: 7596 Points
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6816     avg: 8126     median: 8126 (27%)     max: 9436 Points
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (2%)     max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 59     median: 62 (7%)     max: 74 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 93.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 135.5     median: 138 (6%)     max: 180 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 161     avg: 241     median: 257 (2%)     max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834     avg: 295219     median: 305358 (31%)     max: 321314 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (3%)     max: 109.3 fps
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (18%)
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (70%)
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25     avg: 9.6     median: 10.2 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 23% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 205% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
62%
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
61%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
49%
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
83%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
59%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
67%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
57%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
54%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 58%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 63%

Qualcomm Adreno 690lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact373627
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 660lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011960
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Genshin Impact59.358.855.6
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile66605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
1

1
4
1
2
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 18. 11:26:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1739874387s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 05:19:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.026s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.032s ... 0.077s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.078s

#12 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.038s ... 0.116s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.004s ... 0.12s

#14 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.005s ... 0.125s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.125s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.157s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.157s

#18 Got 269 rows for game benchmarks. +0.024s ... 0.181s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.181s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.182s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.189s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.189s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.189s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)