Intel Core i9-13950HX vs Intel Core i5-13500HX
Intel Core i9-13950HX ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) clocked from 2.2 to 5.5 GHz (single core, all core boost 4.9 GHz) with HyperThreading and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading clocked from 1.6 to 4 GHz. The 13950HX is very similar to the Core i9-13980HX , but with vPro Enterprise support and a 100 MHz reduced boost of the P-cores.
Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).
Performance
The average 13950HX in our database is in the same league as the i9-13980HX and the i9-13900HX while being noticeably faster than the Ryzen 9 7845HX , as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast chip, as of mid 2023.
Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 145 W, the MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US is among the fastest laptops built around the 13950HX that we know of.
Power consumption
The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption is 45 W while its Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to go over 157 W. Intel suggests the "base" power consumption should be set to 55 W, which laptop makers aren't really obliged to do. Most will go for a higher value to get better performance.
This i9 series processor is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.
Intel Core i5-13500HX ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading. The P-Cores clock between 2.5 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache.
Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).
Performance
The average 13500HX in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 7745HX , Core i7-13705H , Core i9-12900HK , Core i9-13900H , Core i9-13905H , as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.
Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.
Power consumption
The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption is 157 W and the Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.
The i5-13500HX is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.
Model Intel Core i9-13950HX Intel Core i5-13500HX Series Intel Raptor Lake-HX Intel Raptor Lake-HX Codename Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Clock 1600 - 5500 MHz 1800 - 4700 MHz L2 Cache 32 MB L3 Cache 36 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 24 / 32 14 / 20 TDP 55 Watt 55 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm Die Size 257 mm2 257 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1964 BGA1964 Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1500 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
45.6 pt (75%)
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500HX
39 pt (64%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
887 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24560 avg: 29352 median: 28681 (27%) max: 33277 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 80% 85% 86% 94% 98% 100%
min: 18235 avg: 18582 median: 18334 (17%) max: 19176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 74% 58% 80% 85% 86% 55% 94% 98% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1952 avg: 2067 median: 2096 (89%) max: 2113 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 96% 92% 98% 99% 100% 99%
min: 1689 avg: 1731 median: 1730.5 (74%) max: 1772 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 84% 96% 92% 98% 80% 99% 100% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 742 avg: 788 median: 801 (89%) max: 816 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 91% 92% 98% 98% 98% 98%
min: 648 avg: 674 median: 679 (75%) max: 695 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 83% 91% 92% 98% 79% 98% 98% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8697 avg: 10973 median: 10919 (27%) max: 12648 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 69% 85% 86% 94% 99% 100%
min: 6978 avg: 7123 median: 7021 (17%) max: 7371 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 74% 58% 69% 85% 86% 56% 94% 99% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3625 avg: 4565 median: 4529 (29%) max: 5227 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 69% 87% 83% 86% 89% 98% 100%
min: 2856 avg: 2894 median: 2863 (18%) max: 2964 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 69% 57% 87% 83% 86% 55% 89% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274 avg: 292.9 median: 297 (86%) max: 303 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 99% 90% 92% 98% 98% 100% 99%
min: 242 avg: 252.3 median: 252 (73%) max: 263 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 87% 99% 83% 90% 92% 98% 80% 98% 100% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
60 Points (78%)
33.7 Points (44%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 56% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (88%)
3.1 Points (77%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 88% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11424 Points (69%)
8980 Points (54%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 79% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
80693 Points (58%)
58608 Points (42%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 73% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
400.2 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.7 s (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 99351 avg: 115415 median: 116665 (67%) max: 127295 MIPS
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 86% 86% 92% 94% 100% 100%
min: 68923 avg: 71289 median: 71243 (41%) max: 73701 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 58% 78% 54% 86% 86% 92% 56% 94% 100% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6445 avg: 6775 median: 6754 (81%) max: 7064 MIPS
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 94% 91% 95% 97% 96% 100% 98%
min: 5377 avg: 5652 median: 5728 (68%) max: 5850 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 83% 94% 81% 91% 95% 97% 76% 96% 100% 98%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 26 avg: 30.7 median: 31 (54%) max: 34.5 fps
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 75% 83% 88% 90% 92% 100% 95%
min: 20.3 avg: 20.5 median: 20.3 (36%) max: 20.9 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 61% 75% 59% 83% 88% 90% 59% 92% 100% 95%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175 avg: 203.1 median: 196 (2%) max: 254 Seconds
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 310 avg: 328.3 median: 336 (4%) max: 339 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 101% 100% 102% 102% 102% 100% 102% 102% 102%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 100 avg: 112.4 median: 111 (1%) max: 137 Seconds
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 178 avg: 188 median: 193 (1%) max: 193 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3823 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4121 sec
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100%
min: 0.4512 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.4891 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 102% 101% 102% 102% 102% 100% 102% 103% 102%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
19311 Points (41%)
min: 13265 avg: 14596 median: 14596 (31%) max: 15927 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 130 W TDP 150 W 82% 69% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.2 s (1%)
7.7 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
322.8 s (1%)
408 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79200 Points (69%)
78386 Points (69%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 150 W 99% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19337 avg: 23708 median: 23960 (65%) max: 27078 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 71% 80% 81% 78% 96% 96% 98% 100%
min: 22848 avg: 23667 median: 23435 (63%) max: 24719 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 81% 80% 87% 81% 78% 96% 84% 96% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81602 Points (66%)
101155 Points (82%)
CPU TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 81% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77857 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81621 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16332 Points (41%)
min: 20276 avg: 20751 median: 20750.5 (52%) max: 21225 Points
CPU TDP 80 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 100% 77% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31279 avg: 37843 median: 39372 (70%) max: 42199 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 82% 83% 74% 93% 98% 98% 100%
min: 28766 avg: 30450 median: 30600 (55%) max: 31983 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 73% 82% 76% 83% 74% 93% 68% 98% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13744 avg: 15379 median: 14805 (62%) max: 18867 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 74% 73% 78% 100% 85% 82%
min: 12867 avg: 13931 median: 14159 (60%) max: 14766 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 75% 78% 78% 74% 73% 78% 68% 100% 85% 82%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2890 avg: 2920 median: 2919.5 (79%) max: 2949 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 134 W 100% 98%
2478 Points (67%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 134 W 100% 84% 98%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 15878 avg: 16928 median: 16927.5 (67%) max: 17977 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 134 W 88% 100%
13404 Points (53%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 134 W 88% 75% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1805 avg: 2013 median: 2043 (81%) max: 2097 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 86% 93% 97% 98% 100% 97%
min: 1688 avg: 1732 median: 1730 (69%) max: 1779 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 82% 86% 93% 97% 80% 98% 100% 97%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16776 avg: 19501 median: 20036 (36%) max: 21853 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 80% 83% 77% 92% 99% 100% 94%
min: 12683 avg: 13344 median: 13581 (24%) max: 13767 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 63% 80% 62% 83% 77% 92% 58% 99% 100% 94%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856 avg: 1979 median: 2006 (9%) max: 2048 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 145 W 99% 91% 97% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16846 avg: 18847 median: 18486.5 (58%) max: 21567 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 145 W 78% 80% 91% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 451 avg: 466.6 median: 468 (1%) max: 478 ms
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 521 avg: 539 median: 547 (1%) max: 550 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
103911 Points (91%)
90065 Points (79%)
CPU TDP 80 W TDP 150 W 87% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279 avg: 290.9 median: 291 (84%) max: 302 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 92% 94% 100% 98% 96% 99%
min: 240 avg: 246.7 median: 243 (70%) max: 257 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 79% 92% 94% 100% 80% 98% 96% 99%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266 avg: 306.3 median: 318.5 (66%) max: 346 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 98% 78% 77% 100% 95% 91% 93%
min: 255 avg: 280.7 median: 293 (61%) max: 294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 98% 85% 78% 77% 100% 74% 95% 91% 93%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1592 avg: 1950 median: 1964 (75%) max: 2139 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 89% 74% 94% 99% 92% 89% 100%
min: 1701 avg: 1833 median: 1832.5 (70%) max: 1964 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 89% 92% 74% 94% 99% 80% 92% 89% 100%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.5 avg: 188.3 median: 205 (35%) max: 223 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 123% 111% 125% 105% 102% 100% 101%
min: 128.6 avg: 132 median: 132 (23%) max: 135.4 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 123% 126% 111% 125% 105% 125% 102% 100% 101%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 145 avg: 212.8 median: 204 (37%) max: 259 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 139% 123% 121% 119% 104% 104% 100%
179.2 Watt (33%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 139% 123% 121% 119% 128% 104% 104% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 14.2 avg: 20 median: 15.5 (10%) max: 35 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 117% 118% 100% 109% 117% 117%
min: 16 avg: 17.4 median: 17.4 (12%) max: 18.8 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 117% 116% 118% 100% 109% 114% 117% 117%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15 avg: 18.5 median: 17 (19%) max: 27.1 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 119% 118% 100% 114% 116%
13.4 Watt (15%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 119% 122% 118% 100% 114% 116%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.8 avg: 21.5 median: 21.4 (16%) max: 25 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 88% 88% 75% 83% 81%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 100% n=34 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500HX → 86% n=34
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 11. 08:31:56
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14667 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726036316s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:16:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.004s ... 0.011s
#8 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.014s ... 0.025s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14667 +0.004s ... 0.029s
#10 got single benchmarks 14667 +0.007s ... 0.036s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.087s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.089s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card