Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-7Y75 vs AMD A12-9720P

Intel Core i7-7Y75

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7Y75

The Intel Core i7-7Y75 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the end of August 2016. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.3-3.6 GHz (2-core Turbo not specified yet). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Despite the changed designation, the Core i7-7Y75 is the successor to the Core m7-6Y75 (Skylake Y-series), so the chip does not reach the performance level of other Core i processors due to the lower TDP. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y75 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

AMD A12-9720P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9720P

The AMD A12-9720P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was introduced in 2017. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts, not verified) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.7 - 3.8 GHz (4.05 GHz for single core were briefly achievable in our test sample), a Radeon R7 iGPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average A12-9720P in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-4210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, making the former a fairly slow chip that's suitable for basic day-to-day activities only as of late 2022.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAM, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9720P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelIntel Core i7-7Y75AMD A12-9720P
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 « 1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1300 - 3600 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
TDP4.5 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGAFP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$393 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-7Y75
23.8 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1390 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
721 Points (31%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 202     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (26%)     max: 267 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (1%)     max: 505 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 251.3     median: 258 (2%)     max: 260 Points
min: 229     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (1%)     max: 240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 121     avg: 125.7     median: 126 (38%)     max: 130 Points
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (22%)     max: 76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.87     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (4%)     max: 2.98 Points
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.44     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (37%)     max: 1.54 Points
min: 0.93     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (23%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5496 Points (33%)
min: 2640     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (17%)     max: 2846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9392 Points (7%)
min: 7200     avg: 7361     median: 7361 (5%)     max: 7522 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
11682 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
6449 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
619 s (7%)
415.5 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.4 s (3%)
13 s (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
9657 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
4617 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
16 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
91.2 fps (21%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
2 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1921 Seconds (14%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
0.9 sec (20%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
3309 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
min: 17.77     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (4%)     max: 21.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.5 s (1%)
min: 39.77     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (2%)     max: 48.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
min: 864     avg: 902     median: 901.5 (4%)     max: 939 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3347     avg: 3582     median: 3688 (10%)     max: 3710 Points
2761 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 34113     avg: 34681     median: 34680.5 (28%)     max: 35248 Points
25648 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 31394     avg: 32948     median: 32948 (27%)     max: 34502 Points
24747 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 35750     avg: 40104     median: 37884 (32%)     max: 46679 Points
min: 24457     avg: 27079     median: 27079 (23%)     max: 29701 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2706     avg: 2924     median: 2994 (8%)     max: 3072 Points
min: 2258     avg: 2330     median: 2329.5 (6%)     max: 2401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4174     median: 4289 (8%)     max: 4395 Points
min: 3179     avg: 3265     median: 3264.5 (6%)     max: 3350 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1387 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
864 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1393 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1142     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (2%)     max: 1468 ms
2422 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
89.4 ms (1%)
min: 146.6     avg: 192.1     median: 192.1 (2%)     max: 237.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22300     avg: 24506     median: 24506 (22%)     max: 26712 Points
min: 14783     avg: 16961     median: 16960.5 (15%)     max: 19138 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 110     avg: 127     median: 127 (26%)     max: 144 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
654 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
18.5 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
17.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7Y75 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9720P → 85% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 01:29:23

#0 checking url part for id 8161 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9192 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8161 +0.021s ... 0.069s

#7 got single benchmarks 8161 +0.025s ... 0.093s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9192 +0.003s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 9192 +0.017s ... 0.114s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.283s ... 0.397s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.42s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)