Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Core i5-13500

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13500

The Intel Core i5-13500 is a fast and relatively power efficient desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz and reaches up to 4.8 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture introduced with Alder Lake is also used in the Raptor Lake processors. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500, the Intel Core i5-13500 offers more cores, which means a higher overall performance can be achieved. In total, the Intel Core i5-13500 can process up to 20 threads in parallel. The performance cores (P cores) offer hyperthreading for this purpose, which is withheld from the energy-efficient cores (E cores).

Performance

Due to the higher number of physical computing units, the Intel Core i5-13500 offers noticeably more performance compared to the Intel Core i5-12500. Both processors have 6 P-cores, although only the Intel Core i5-13500 is additionally equipped with 8 E-cores.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12600K, the Intel Core i5-13500 offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500 is 65 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 154 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500, the energy requirement increases slightly.

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

Performance

The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i5-13500Intel Core i9-13900HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901E compare2.8 - 5.6 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 « 2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701E compare2.6 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901TE compare2.3 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE compare2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E compare3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E compare2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4800 MHz1600 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB32 MB
L3 Cache24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
45 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (60%)
121.4 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
1675 Points (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14573 Points (14%)
min: 24270     avg: 28275     median: 27900 (26%)     max: 32623 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1780 Points (75%)
min: 1867     avg: 2044     median: 2056 (86%)     max: 2105 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
685 Points (75%)
min: 722     avg: 784     median: 788 (86%)     max: 810 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5633 Points (14%)
min: 9152     avg: 10785     median: 10557 (26%)     max: 12541 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2405 Points (15%)
min: 3913     avg: 4521     median: 4494.5 (28%)     max: 4970 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
256 Points (71%)
min: 247     avg: 292     median: 296 (82%)     max: 304 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.4 Points (37%)
min: 49.5     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (68%)     max: 55.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (74%)
min: 3.64     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8875 Points (54%)
min: 11618     avg: 11700     median: 11699.5 (71%)     max: 11781 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
49300 Points (36%)
min: 76718     avg: 79300     median: 79299.5 (57%)     max: 81881 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
79625 Points (51%)
111582 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14282 Points (17%)
17169 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100.7 s (1%)
215.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7704 Points (12%)
min: 12876     avg: 12916     median: 12916 (20%)     max: 12956 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
55528 MIPS (32%)
min: 90675     avg: 112115     median: 115262 (66%)     max: 127283 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5887 MIPS (69%)
min: 6340     avg: 6859     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7177 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.6 fps (3%)
217.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
306 fps (8%)
387.7 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
min: 23.5     avg: 29.2     median: 29.8 (52%)     max: 34.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 2.1     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.3 GB/s (40%)
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (73%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12 GB/s (31%)
min: 15.2     avg: 17     median: 17 (44%)     max: 18.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
399 Seconds (5%)
min: 175     avg: 209.9     median: 202 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
223 Seconds (2%)
min: 101     avg: 117.6     median: 113.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4564 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14875 Points (32%)
min: 16591     avg: 17802     median: 18036.5 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
min: 6.2     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.215 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 315     avg: 315.1     median: 315.1 (1%)     max: 315.265 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
69725 Points (54%)
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (59%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18026 Points (44%)
min: 19090     avg: 23181     median: 23767 (59%)     max: 25681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84456 Points (69%)
min: 77043     avg: 86045     median: 83045 (67%)     max: 101046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
83392 Points (68%)
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81778 Points (66%)
85007 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17891 Points (45%)
min: 16532     avg: 21282     median: 21573 (55%)     max: 23984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26263 Points (47%)
min: 28693     avg: 37096     median: 37730 (67%)     max: 43004 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9655 Points (41%)
min: 13288     avg: 15302     median: 15066 (64%)     max: 18304 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2483 Points (60%)
min: 2548     avg: 2770     median: 2871 (69%)     max: 2892 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
10348 Points (40%)
min: 15031     avg: 16586     median: 16712 (65%)     max: 18014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2191     avg: 2625     median: 2713 (86%)     max: 2818 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 14982     avg: 16173     median: 16420.5 (67%)     max: 16949 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1805 Points (69%)
min: 1345     avg: 1991     median: 2041.5 (77%)     max: 2093 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10322 Points (18%)
min: 17614     avg: 19819     median: 20013.5 (36%)     max: 21075 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1749 Points (8%)
min: 1804     avg: 1964     median: 1982 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10213 Points (32%)
min: 18612     avg: 19451     median: 19027 (60%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7379 Points (74%)
min: 8706     avg: 8840     median: 8843 (88%)     max: 8936 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39094 Points (38%)
min: 66537     avg: 70316     median: 71143 (70%)     max: 71700 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
519 ms (1%)
min: 453     avg: 471     median: 464 (1%)     max: 520 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 95898     avg: 101834     median: 103988 (76%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (70%)
min: 243     avg: 289.1     median: 291 (80%)     max: 304 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
266 Points (48%)
min: 266     avg: 321.9     median: 322 (58%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1549 Points (58%)
min: 1825     avg: 2073     median: 2113.5 (79%)     max: 2295 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98.7 Watt (17%)
min: 106.1     avg: 173.5     median: 178.7 (31%)     max: 231 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121 Watt (22%)
min: 176     avg: 216.9     median: 222 (41%)     max: 266 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.9 Watt (5%)
min: 13.9     avg: 24.1     median: 25 (17%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 19.7     median: 18.8 (23%)     max: 29 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 19.5     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (16%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 142% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 04:22:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759803744s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.032s ... 0.045s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.101s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)