Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9900K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9900K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. At the time of announcement in late 2018, the 9900K is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU and offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking. The CPU integrates 8 cores (16 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 5 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is up to 25 % faster than the older Core i7-8700K. The single thread performance is only slightly faster due to the higher clock speeds. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9900K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i9-9900K
CodenameAlder LakeCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 16
TDP125 Watt95 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
40 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900K
33.5 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
12397 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (80%)
1280 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (80%)
min: 495     avg: 502     median: 502 (55%)     max: 509 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
min: 4816     avg: 4871     median: 4871 (12%)     max: 4926 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
min: 1623     avg: 1939     median: 1979 (12%)     max: 2040 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (76%)
min: 203     avg: 210.6     median: 212 (59%)     max: 218 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
min: 17.37     avg: 20.7     median: 21.4 (28%)     max: 21.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (79%)
min: 2.33     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (57%)     max: 2.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
min: 7786     avg: 7924     median: 7933 (48%)     max: 8042 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
min: 36683     avg: 45846     median: 48778.5 (35%)     max: 49142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (57%)
min: 63009     avg: 63708     median: 63976 (41%)     max: 64138 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
min: 10167     avg: 10218     median: 10192 (12%)     max: 10294 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
min: 85.6     avg: 91.9     median: 91.3 (1%)     max: 98.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
min: 3.276     avg: 4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 5.203 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
min: 7315     avg: 7775     median: 7633 (12%)     max: 8518 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
min: 43248     avg: 48207     median: 48207 (28%)     max: 53166 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (70%)
min: 5311     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (64%)     max: 5510 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (4%)
min: 90.9     avg: 110     median: 114.3 (3%)     max: 120.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (9%)
min: 252.7     avg: 260.9     median: 260.5 (7%)     max: 270 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
min: 12.36     avg: 14.8     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 0.8     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
min: 7.8     avg: 10.4     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
min: 219.2     avg: 239.7     median: 223.8 (2%)     max: 276.1 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
min: 10312     avg: 13253     median: 14281.5 (30%)     max: 14409 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
min: 7.545     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.823 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
min: 16.73     avg: 17     median: 16.9 (1%)     max: 17.25 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
min: 413.8     avg: 429.5     median: 432.2 (2%)     max: 440 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (66%)
min: 58733     avg: 65154     median: 65153.5 (50%)     max: 71574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (62%)
min: 16598     avg: 17566     median: 17264 (43%)     max: 19169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
min: 64697     avg: 67569     median: 67554.5 (55%)     max: 72059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
min: 67420     avg: 68874     median: 67813 (55%)     max: 72450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (62%)
min: 67259     avg: 68959     median: 68173.5 (55%)     max: 72229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
min: 16435     avg: 17955     median: 17969 (45%)     max: 18694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
min: 21585     avg: 24141     median: 24497.5 (44%)     max: 25010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
min: 9413     avg: 10630     median: 10593 (45%)     max: 11298 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2629 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12969 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (72%)
1300 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
8845 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
min: 6014     avg: 6113     median: 6049 (60%)     max: 6339 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (46%)
min: 26616     avg: 31703     median: 32981 (32%)     max: 34233 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
min: 919     avg: 937     median: 924 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
71 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38473     avg: 40081     median: 40081 (29%)     max: 41689 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
202 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
203.2 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900K → 84% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 19:40:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10442 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759081241s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10442 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 10442 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.086s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)