Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP1 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP1

The ARM Mali-G57 MP1 or MC1 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the UniSoc T616 and uses 1 clusters (hence the MC1/MP1 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP2

The ARM Mali-G71 MP2 is an integrated entry-level graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip Mediatek Helio P23 with 700 or 770 MHz clock speed. Supports OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1 and RenderScript.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G57 MP1ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesnono
technology4 nm7 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 03.07.2020 03.06.2016
CodenameValhallMimir
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines1 - unified2 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
Core Speed770 (Boost) MHz
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T7280 (T620)8 x 1800 MHz850 MHz? MHz
UNISOC T6198 x 1800 MHz850 MHz? MHz
Unisoc T7255 (T616)8 x 1800 MHz750 MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? - 850 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78858 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 79048 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T8 x 2300 MHz770 MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 770 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 1152     avg: 11630     median: 11251.5 (1%)     max: 15567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
13392 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 1414     avg: 1548     median: 1506 (7%)     max: 1710 Points
min: 629     avg: 779     median: 742 (3%)     max: 1097 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 1255     avg: 1386     median: 1343 (3%)     max: 1518 Points
min: 564     avg: 680     median: 642 (1%)     max: 971 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 958     avg: 1002     median: 979 (4%)     max: 1109 Points
min: 431     avg: 528     median: 507 (2%)     max: 737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 814     avg: 853     median: 829 (2%)     max: 942 Points
min: 371     avg: 443.3     median: 419 (1%)     max: 629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1385     avg: 1487     median: 1437 (13%)     max: 1656 Points
min: 70     avg: 669     median: 725 (6%)     max: 1001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1236     avg: 1331     median: 1308 (8%)     max: 1471 Points
min: 55     avg: 579     median: 623 (4%)     max: 879 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 361     avg: 949     median: 958 (5%)     max: 1103 Points
min: 68     avg: 480.3     median: 486 (2%)     max: 741 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 290     avg: 809     median: 816 (3%)     max: 935 Points
min: 53     avg: 404.4     median: 402 (1%)     max: 634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 392     avg: 441.7     median: 422 (0%)     max: 564 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 99     avg: 117.9     median: 113 (0%)     max: 154 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
min: 0.8     avg: 1.1     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 6.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
min: 0.85     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.7 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.5 (0%)     max: 2.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 1.9     avg: 5.7     median: 5.5 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
min: 3.8     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (0%)     max: 5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
min: 4.9     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 6.9 fps
min: 2.6     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (0%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 6.1     avg: 9     median: 8.8 (0%)     max: 10 fps
min: 4.3     avg: 7     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 9.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
min: 11     avg: 14.8     median: 14 (1%)     max: 19 fps
min: 7     avg: 11     median: 11 (0%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP1
min: 20     avg: 23.1     median: 22 (0%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2
min: 14     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (0%)     max: 34 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 22069     avg: 30972     median: 30203 (3%)     max: 39165 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
min: 0     avg: 23231     median: 23331 (2%)     max: 30912 Points
20906 Points (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
min: 9.58     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (0%)     max: 11.4 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
min: 443     avg: 460.1     median: 455 (0%)     max: 512 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
min: 433     avg: 466.7     median: 458 (0%)     max: 529 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8097     avg: 13148     median: 13735 (5%)     max: 17613 Points
min: 2471     avg: 4582     median: 4550 (2%)     max: 6755 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 11168     avg: 12945     median: 11902 (20%)     max: 15764 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1444     median: 1451.5 (2%)     max: 1668 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 1.642     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.79 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 5% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 3% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP1:
58  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
34%
Mali-G57 MP1:
30  fps
34%
Mali-G71 MP2:
30  fps
med.
Mali-G71 MP2:
26 29 30 ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
51%
Mali-G57 MP1:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
46%
Mali-G71 MP2:
21 29 29 30 ~ 27 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G71 MP2:
30 58 60 60 ~ 52 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
47  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
46%
Mali-G71 MP2:
46 48 54 60 ~ 52 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
28 29 29 30 ~ 29 fps
high
Mali-G57 MP1:
26  fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 24 25 28 29 29 ~ 26 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
59  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G57 MP1:
61  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 43%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 42%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 46%

Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G57 MP1ARM Mali-G71 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5955
PUBG Mobile8759403030302827
Dead Trigger 211452
Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G57 MP1ARM Mali-G71 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1

1


1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 24. 18:54:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11103 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8348 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758732842s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Sep 2025 05:19:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.019s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11103 +0s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 11103 +0.019s ... 0.049s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8348 +0s ... 0.05s

#14 got single benchmarks 8348 +0.019s ... 0.069s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.09s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.09s

#18 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.103s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.103s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.103s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.106s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.106s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)