Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 H 270

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 275HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.4 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 1900 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 275HX is only slightly behind the top model, the Core Ultra 9 285HX, due to the 100 MHz lower boost clock of the P-cores Core Ultra 9 285HX and therefore also remains below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform just behind or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

AMD Ryzen 9 H 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 H 270

The Ryzen 9 H 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 270 (or Ryzen 9 8945HS) for China, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 H 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXAMD Ryzen 9 H 270
CodenameArrow Lake-HXHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX compare2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2100 - 5400 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache40 MB8 MB
L3 Cache36 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 275HX
48.4 pt (81%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 133.5     median: 133.8 (75%)     max: 138.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2019     median: 2057 (38%)     max: 2288 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35761     median: 35959 (33%)     max: 40970 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2191     median: 2193.5 (92%)     max: 2267 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 843     median: 846 (92%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12026     avg: 14009     median: 14183 (35%)     max: 16108 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5596     median: 5679 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 330.6     median: 332.5 (92%)     max: 343 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 98236     avg: 113469     median: 112452 (65%)     max: 124155 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6026     avg: 6677     median: 6659 (78%)     max: 7149 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38     median: 38.9 (68%)     max: 43.8 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 154.9     median: 149 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 95.5     median: 92.5 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123908 Points (95%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26428     median: 26595.5 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 107108     median: 107108 (87%)     max: 109928 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 26013     median: 25896 (66%)     max: 29274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 46717     median: 47918.5 (85%)     max: 53054 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13789     avg: 16109     median: 16306 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2863     avg: 3042     median: 3054.5 (76%)     max: 3160 Points
2407 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19380     median: 19381.5 (75%)     max: 21668 Points
12330 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2033     avg: 2202     median: 2217 (87%)     max: 2292 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 22819     median: 22612 (41%)     max: 25855 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 402     avg: 413.5     median: 411 (0%)     max: 432 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 123370     avg: 127054     median: 127124 (93%)     max: 130140 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 327.8     median: 333 (91%)     max: 341 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 351.5     median: 346.5 (62%)     max: 532 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2163     median: 2184.5 (82%)     max: 2339 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 197     median: 209.5 (36%)     max: 270 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 229.1     median: 237 (43%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 29.8     median: 27.1 (18%)     max: 55.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 21.4     median: 20.5 (23%)     max: 38.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 25.1     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 → 71% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 01:10:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18886 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19851 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755472211s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.032s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19851 +0.001s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 19851 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)