Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255U vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Core Ultra 7 255U

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255U

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U is an upper mid-range CPU with 12 cores from the Arrow Lake U series, which was introduced at the beginning of 2025. The chip is similar to the Meteor Lake U series, but the compute part is manufactured using the modern Intel 3 process and therefore offers higher clock rates.

Like its predecessor, the SoC is based on a tile/chiplet design. The smaller compute tile (compared to the H processors) offers 2 performance cores (P cores, Redwood Cove architecture, SMT) and 8 efficiency cores (E cores, Crestmont architecture). The P-cores support hyperthreading (therefore 14 threads together) and clock up to 5.2 GHz. The E-cores clock at a maximum of 4.2 GHz. In addition, there are now two more low-power efficiency cores with up to 2.4 GHz on the low-power island; the compute tile can therefore be completely deactivated when idle and during simple tasks in order to save power.

Performance

Due to the higher clock rates, the Core Ultra 7 255U can clearly distinguish itself from the old top model Core Ultra 7 165U (12 cores, max 4.9 / 3.8 GHz, 12 MB cache). The old Core Ultra 7 155U lags even further behind due to its low clock rates.

Graphics unit

The Core Ultra 7 155U offers a new Arc-based iGPU called Intel Graphics with 4 Xe cores and 64 EUs that reach a maximum of 2.1 GHz. However, the performance is far below the new Arc iGPU in the H series.

Features

Arrow Lake-U has integrated WiFi 6E (WiFi 7 optional). The integrated memory controller now supports LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (max. 128 GB). A dedicated NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) is now used. The Xe Media Engine supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 Decode up to 8K 10-bit HDR. The chip now supports PCIe-5.0 (x8 for GPU) and PCIe-4.0 (three x12 for SSDs).

Power consumption

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U is specified with 15 watts TDP (base) and 57 watts (PL2) max. turbo power. Meteor Lake consists of five individual chips, whereby the processor part is manufactured in the new Intel 3 process (5nm). The graphics unit is produced at TSMC in N5 and the SoC and I/O tile in the older N6 process. These 4 chips are then applied to the 22nm base tile using the Foveros process.

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 258V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 256V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 258V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 258V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that one of the two systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 255UIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
CodenameArrow Lake-ULunar Lake
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-UIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255U « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235U compare2.4 - 4.9 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225U compare2.4 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 14
2 x 5.2 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 4.2 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP15 Watt17 Watt
Technology5 nm3 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA2833
FeaturesDDR5-6400/LPDDR5-8400/LPDDR5x-8400 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 2100 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V (300 - 1950 MHz)
NPU / AI12 TOPS INT847 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.4 MB
L2 Cache14 MB
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Chip AI115 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255U
36.9 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 258V
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 104.3     avg: 107.9     median: 107.9 (61%)     max: 111.4 Points
min: 107.8     avg: 118.7     median: 119.8 (67%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 560     avg: 616     median: 616 (11%)     max: 672 Points
min: 406     avg: 555     median: 573 (11%)     max: 660 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11581     avg: 11869     median: 11869 (11%)     max: 12157 Points
min: 7920     avg: 10159     median: 10416 (10%)     max: 11097 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1829     avg: 1872     median: 1872 (79%)     max: 1915 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1857     median: 1865 (78%)     max: 1957 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 701     avg: 720     median: 719.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
min: 643     avg: 711     median: 716 (78%)     max: 749 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4459     avg: 4587     median: 4586.5 (11%)     max: 4714 Points
min: 3130     avg: 3945     median: 4071 (10%)     max: 4314 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1851     avg: 1904     median: 1904 (12%)     max: 1957 Points
min: 1280     avg: 1568     median: 1597 (10%)     max: 1656 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
251 Points (70%)
min: 258     avg: 284.2     median: 286 (79%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.7 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9982 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36479 Points (26%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
296.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.2 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8536 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41105     avg: 42881     median: 42881 (25%)     max: 44657 MIPS
min: 28482     avg: 34715     median: 35705 (20%)     max: 36724 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5208     avg: 5218     median: 5217.5 (61%)     max: 5227 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5690     median: 5706 (67%)     max: 5869 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (22%)     max: 13.1 fps
min: 9.65     avg: 12.4     median: 12.4 (22%)     max: 14.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 591     avg: 602     median: 602 (8%)     max: 613 Seconds
min: 509     avg: 601     median: 585.5 (7%)     max: 772 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 315     avg: 317     median: 317 (2%)     max: 319 Seconds
min: 315     avg: 357.7     median: 351 (2%)     max: 452 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4654     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4672 sec
min: 0.443     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10693 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
418.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
40813 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17039     avg: 17212     median: 17212 (42%)     max: 17385 Points
min: 11274     avg: 14709     median: 15288 (38%)     max: 15903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
94008 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15421 Points (39%)
min: 10515     avg: 13417     median: 13694.5 (35%)     max: 14569 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16224     avg: 19587     median: 19587 (35%)     max: 22950 Points
min: 15893     avg: 20464     median: 21012.5 (37%)     max: 22333 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7247     avg: 7578     median: 7577.5 (32%)     max: 7908 Points
min: 2097     avg: 6649     median: 7009 (30%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2462     avg: 2493     median: 2492.5 (60%)     max: 2523 Points
min: 2593     avg: 2740     median: 2754 (67%)     max: 2795 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 10421     avg: 10748     median: 10748 (42%)     max: 11075 Points
min: 8964     avg: 10785     median: 10967 (43%)     max: 11334 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1766     avg: 1813     median: 1812.5 (69%)     max: 1859 Points
min: 1891     avg: 1997     median: 2006 (76%)     max: 2046 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9957     avg: 10089     median: 10088.5 (18%)     max: 10220 Points
min: 7574     avg: 9422     median: 9651 (17%)     max: 9864 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 548     median: 547.5 (1%)     max: 563 ms
min: 468     avg: 484.4     median: 476 (1%)     max: 559 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
104376 Points (76%)
min: 94615     avg: 107955     median: 112290 (82%)     max: 113526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 249     median: 249 (68%)     max: 254 Points
min: 199.5     avg: 270     median: 279 (77%)     max: 291 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 283     avg: 286.5     median: 286.5 (51%)     max: 290 Points
min: 219     avg: 285.9     median: 295 (53%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1638     avg: 1725     median: 1725 (65%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1551     avg: 1682     median: 1702 (64%)     max: 1742 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.6     avg: 47.3     median: 47.3 (8%)     max: 55 Watt
min: 28     avg: 45     median: 46.2 (8%)     max: 55.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65     avg: 65.4     median: 65.4 (12%)     max: 65.7 Watt
min: 38.2     avg: 53.6     median: 54.1 (10%)     max: 61.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.84     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (3%)     max: 5.4 Watt
min: 1.484     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 7.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.21     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 6.61 Watt
min: 2.25     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (7%)     max: 9.04 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.2     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 30.1 Points per Watt
min: 26.1     avg: 29.5     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 33.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255U → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 258V → 100% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 03. 10:21:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18741 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17995 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759479703s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18741 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 18741 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17995 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 17995 +0.026s ... 0.05s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.093s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)