Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

The Core Ultra 7 is superior to the top model Core Ultra 9 285H as only the maximum Turbo frequency is 200 MHz lower. Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform slightly below the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen AI 7 350AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
CodenameArrow Lake-HKrackan Point (Zen 5)Strix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3602 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock4400 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache26 MB8 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt28 Watt54 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt54 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI96 TOPS INT866 TOPS INT873 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86x86
$514 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255H
42.1 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
41 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 119     avg: 123.6     median: 123.5 (62%)     max: 128.1 Points
min: 113.5     avg: 115.8     median: 115.5 (58%)     max: 119 Points
min: 102.7     avg: 112.1     median: 113.5 (57%)     max: 116.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 750     avg: 973     median: 950 (18%)     max: 1197 Points
min: 720     avg: 898     median: 911 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 992.5 (18%)     max: 1112 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16105     avg: 18399     median: 17812 (17%)     max: 22578 Points
min: 12647     avg: 15820     median: 16150 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
min: 11462     avg: 17784     median: 18698 (17%)     max: 20649 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1874     avg: 2061     median: 2079 (85%)     max: 2152 Points
min: 1916     avg: 1959     median: 1954 (79%)     max: 2006 Points
min: 1942     avg: 1985     median: 1992 (81%)     max: 2001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 748     avg: 793     median: 801.5 (87%)     max: 826 Points
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 768 (84%)     max: 784 Points
min: 758     avg: 780     median: 782 (85%)     max: 787 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6356     avg: 7221     median: 6973.5 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
min: 4897     avg: 6168     median: 6329 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
min: 5247     avg: 7126     median: 7303 (18%)     max: 8070 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2414     avg: 2865     median: 2835 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2467     median: 2504 (16%)     max: 2734 Points
min: 1950     avg: 2759     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 3075 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 304.7     median: 309 (86%)     max: 322 Points
min: 204     avg: 278.9     median: 295 (82%)     max: 305 Points
min: 195.7     avg: 287.2     median: 303 (84%)     max: 306 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 Points (69%)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 Points (47%)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
302.8 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 Points (12%)
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 42155     avg: 57634     median: 56815 (33%)     max: 68652 MIPS
min: 48124     avg: 57170     median: 59319 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
min: 47754     avg: 65201     median: 69773 (40%)     max: 71722 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4589     avg: 5855     median: 5963 (70%)     max: 6385 MIPS
min: 5544     avg: 6011     median: 6042 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
min: 5790     avg: 5984     median: 6017 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (4%)
155.1 fps (4%)
96.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (9%)
319 fps (8%)
258.7 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.7     avg: 20.7     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 26.5 fps
min: 16.2     avg: 20.3     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 21.8     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 24.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 256     avg: 343.2     median: 332 (4%)     max: 492 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 331.4     median: 319 (4%)     max: 427 Seconds
min: 243     avg: 300.9     median: 270 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 157     avg: 206.6     median: 199.5 (1%)     max: 293 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 220.9     median: 199.5 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 192.3     median: 175 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
min: 0.4091     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (31%)     max: 15034 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
8.7 s (0%)
415.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17409     avg: 21142     median: 20853 (51%)     max: 24715 Points
min: 13154     avg: 19309     median: 19863 (49%)     max: 21820 Points
min: 17153     avg: 19025     median: 18698 (46%)     max: 20777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
61739 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (91%)     max: 117068 Points
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13466     avg: 19590     median: 19835.5 (50%)     max: 23195 Points
min: 16181     avg: 18334     median: 18480 (47%)     max: 20125 Points
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 22456     avg: 30609     median: 29389 (52%)     max: 37837 Points
min: 21629     avg: 27467     median: 28250 (50%)     max: 30008 Points
min: 19564     avg: 27580     median: 28875 (51%)     max: 29894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6177     avg: 11207     median: 11307 (48%)     max: 13757 Points
min: 8566     avg: 10013     median: 10165.5 (43%)     max: 11005 Points
min: 7753     avg: 10008     median: 10247 (43%)     max: 10783 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2712     avg: 2846     median: 2866 (66%)     max: 2925 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2726     median: 2853.5 (66%)     max: 2942 Points
min: 2778     avg: 2832     median: 2815 (65%)     max: 2920 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11979     avg: 15219     median: 14990 (58%)     max: 17489 Points
min: 10774     avg: 12979     median: 13092.5 (51%)     max: 14194 Points
min: 12627     avg: 14265     median: 14262 (55%)     max: 15137 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1938     avg: 2045     median: 2045 (69%)     max: 2121 Points
min: 805     avg: 1855     median: 2054 (69%)     max: 2155 Points
min: 2062     avg: 2080     median: 2070 (70%)     max: 2104 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11348     avg: 14627     median: 14330.5 (26%)     max: 17218 Points
min: 6705     avg: 11155     median: 11434 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
min: 9599     avg: 12817     median: 13115 (23%)     max: 14182 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 Points (9%)
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 Points (42%)
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 Points (87%)
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
8159 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 Points (49%)
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
43651 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 427     avg: 455.4     median: 454 (1%)     max: 510 ms
min: 431     avg: 484     median: 437 (1%)     max: 693 ms
min: 430     avg: 440.5     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 112005     avg: 117358     median: 117689 (78%)     max: 122048 Points
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (76%)     max: 119825 Points
min: 106359     avg: 112650     median: 110756 (73%)     max: 120835 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 247     avg: 291.7     median: 298 (78%)     max: 317 Points
min: 193.1     avg: 250.7     median: 258 (67%)     max: 277 Points
min: 255     avg: 271.9     median: 265 (69%)     max: 330 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 273     avg: 310.6     median: 313 (56%)     max: 331 Points
min: 256     avg: 300.6     median: 313 (56%)     max: 336 Points
min: 289     avg: 317.2     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1610     avg: 1898     median: 1935.5 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
min: 1452     avg: 1767     median: 1762 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
min: 1658     avg: 1768     median: 1742 (65%)     max: 1964 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.3     avg: 79.1     median: 59.2 (10%)     max: 142.9 Watt
min: 39.8     avg: 78.3     median: 72.4 (12%)     max: 112.4 Watt
min: 38.9     avg: 77.8     median: 75.8 (13%)     max: 116.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.7     avg: 91.9     median: 69.9 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 39.2     avg: 78.8     median: 74.7 (14%)     max: 115.7 Watt
min: 72.1     avg: 86.4     median: 83.2 (15%)     max: 113.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.5     avg: 7.9     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 15.4 Watt
min: 3.7     avg: 11     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
min: 3.47     avg: 7.2     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 9.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.6     avg: 18.5     median: 9 (7%)     max: 137.5 Watt
min: 5.05     avg: 7.4     median: 7 (5%)     max: 12.1 Watt
min: 6.86     avg: 8.6     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 11 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.5     avg: 34.2     median: 39.5 (29%)     max: 43.2 Points per Watt
min: 21     avg: 33.3     median: 34.1 (25%)     max: 49.3 Points per Watt
min: 32.5     avg: 35.4     median: 34.3 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255H → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 94% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 98% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 06. 08:20:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18903 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765005652s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Dec 2025 05:18:50 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.019s ... 0.03s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#11 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.019s ... 0.053s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.003s ... 0.057s

#13 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.011s ... 0.068s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.087s ... 0.155s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.155s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)