Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

The Core Ultra 7 is superior to the top model Core Ultra 9 285H as only the maximum Turbo frequency is 200 MHz lower. Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform slightly below the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
CodenameArrow Lake-HStrix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock4400 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt54 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology5 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$514 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255H
42.4 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.5     avg: 126.2     median: 126.5 (71%)     max: 128.1 Points
min: 102.7     avg: 112.1     median: 113.5 (64%)     max: 116.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 750     avg: 942     median: 856 (16%)     max: 1197 Points
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 992.5 (18%)     max: 1112 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16435     avg: 18134     median: 17652.5 (16%)     max: 22578 Points
min: 11462     avg: 17784     median: 18698 (17%)     max: 20649 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2047     avg: 2095     median: 2098.5 (88%)     max: 2152 Points
min: 1942     avg: 1985     median: 1992 (84%)     max: 2001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 786     avg: 805     median: 807 (88%)     max: 826 Points
min: 758     avg: 780     median: 782 (85%)     max: 787 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6414     avg: 7150     median: 7015 (17%)     max: 8860 Points
min: 5247     avg: 7126     median: 7303 (18%)     max: 8070 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2414     avg: 2829     median: 2835 (18%)     max: 3444 Points
min: 1950     avg: 2759     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 3075 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 306.9     median: 312 (86%)     max: 322 Points
min: 195.7     avg: 287.2     median: 303 (84%)     max: 306 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.3 Points (41%)
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11500 Points (69%)
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65269 Points (47%)
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
96508 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17883 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
319.3 s (4%)
302.8 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7777 Points (12%)
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47514     avg: 57327     median: 56801 (33%)     max: 68627 MIPS
min: 47754     avg: 65201     median: 69773 (40%)     max: 71722 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4589     avg: 5906     median: 6015.5 (71%)     max: 6385 MIPS
min: 5790     avg: 5984     median: 6017 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
154.7 fps (52%)
96.8 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
354.5 fps (82%)
258.7 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.2     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 25.8 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 21.8     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 24.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 256     avg: 340     median: 341 (4%)     max: 429 Seconds
min: 243     avg: 300.9     median: 270 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 157     avg: 207.7     median: 211 (1%)     max: 251 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 192.3     median: 175 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4233     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.515 sec
min: 0.4091     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14666     avg: 14844     median: 14843.5 (32%)     max: 15021 Points
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (31%)     max: 15034 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
415.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 79410     avg: 80381     median: 80381 (62%)     max: 81352 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18204     avg: 21223     median: 20949 (52%)     max: 24715 Points
min: 17153     avg: 19025     median: 18698 (46%)     max: 20777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 106965     avg: 111352     median: 111352 (90%)     max: 115738 Points
61739 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 106511     avg: 111384     median: 111384 (90%)     max: 116256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 108898     avg: 112983     median: 112983 (91%)     max: 117068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19528     avg: 19733     median: 19769 (50%)     max: 19902 Points
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27621     avg: 30658     median: 29128 (52%)     max: 37837 Points
min: 19564     avg: 27580     median: 28875 (51%)     max: 29894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9186     avg: 11565     median: 11334.5 (48%)     max: 13757 Points
min: 7753     avg: 10008     median: 10247 (43%)     max: 10783 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2892     median: 2894 (72%)     max: 2925 Points
min: 2778     avg: 2832     median: 2815 (70%)     max: 2920 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11979     avg: 14969     median: 15223 (59%)     max: 17489 Points
min: 12627     avg: 14265     median: 14262 (55%)     max: 15137 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1980     avg: 2081     median: 2103 (82%)     max: 2121 Points
min: 2062     avg: 2080     median: 2070 (81%)     max: 2104 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11348     avg: 14420     median: 14322 (26%)     max: 17218 Points
min: 9599     avg: 12817     median: 13115 (23%)     max: 14182 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2094 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8697 Points (87%)
8159 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50379 Points (50%)
43651 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 427     avg: 441.3     median: 443 (1%)     max: 455 ms
min: 430     avg: 440.5     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 116699     avg: 119142     median: 118679 (87%)     max: 122048 Points
min: 106359     avg: 112650     median: 110756 (81%)     max: 120835 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 291     avg: 303.9     median: 303.5 (83%)     max: 317 Points
min: 255     avg: 271.9     median: 265 (73%)     max: 330 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 315.1     median: 315 (57%)     max: 327 Points
min: 289     avg: 317.2     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1665     avg: 1905     median: 1920 (72%)     max: 2058 Points
min: 1658     avg: 1768     median: 1742 (65%)     max: 1964 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49     avg: 72.1     median: 57.6 (10%)     max: 131.1 Watt
min: 38.9     avg: 77.8     median: 75.8 (13%)     max: 116.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.6     avg: 93.1     median: 69.9 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 72.1     avg: 86.4     median: 83.2 (15%)     max: 113.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.84     avg: 7.7     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 11.1 Watt
min: 3.47     avg: 7.2     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 9.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.39     avg: 8.8     median: 9 (10%)     max: 9.56 Watt
min: 6.86     avg: 8.6     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 11 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.5     avg: 34.6     median: 39.5 (29%)     max: 40.6 Points per Watt
min: 32.5     avg: 35.4     median: 34.3 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255H → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 98% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 04:36:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18903 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755138984s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 18903 +0.012s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.011s ... 0.038s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.093s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)