The 10 Best Gaming Laptops for Late 2017
Gaming laptops are one of the most exciting areas of notebook development. The designs themselves might typically be more old-fashioned or traditional than the sleek ultra-slim devices we often see today, but the idea that something that is still quite compact can pack as much performance as a gaming desktop is impressive.
With Black Friday, Cyber Monday, Christmas and New Years sales, the last two months of the year are a great time to snag yourself a bargain on a new notebook. We have pulled the top 10 gaming notebooks from our database based on the overall NotebookCheck score and identified our top picks for portability, display, gaming performance, battery life, and value.
To reduce the list, we decided that any candidates needed a review from within the last 12 months, a modern Intel Kaby Lake, Kaby Lake-R, Coffee Lake, or AMD Ryzen processor, and an Nvidia GTX 1060 or AMD RX 580 or higher graphics card. Any specific subcategory requirements are listed in each section. Price isn't a limiting factor here; for budget models, be sure to check out our Top 5 Budget Gaming Laptops for Late 2017, which contains some great options.
This list is part of a series of holiday buying guides. For other categories, be sure to check out:
- Top 10 Ultraportable Notebooks (Holiday 2017)
- Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks (Holiday 2017)
- Top 10 Smartphones (Holiday 2017)
- Top 5 Budget Gaming Notebooks (Holiday 2017)
- Top 5 Budget Multimedia Notebooks (Holiday 2017)
- Top 5 Budget Ultraportables (Holiday 2017)
You can click on any laptop's name in the table below to read our comprehensive review for more details.
Top 10 Gaming Notebooks: Holiday 2017
Rank | Rating | Date | Image | Model / Review | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Screen | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 88.7 % v6 (old) | 04 / 2017 | Razer Blade (2017) Intel Core i7-7700HQ ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile ⎘ 15.9 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
2 | 88.4 % v6 (old) | 10 / 2017 | Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q Intel Core i7-7820HK ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | 3.6 kg | 25.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
3 | 88 % v6 (old) | 06 / 2017 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J Intel Core i7-7700HQ ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB NVMe | 3.1 kg | 27.62 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | matte | ||
4 | 88.3 % v6 (old) | 03 / 2017 | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | 5 kg | 47 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | matte | ||
5 | 88.3 % v6 (old) | 02 / 2017 | Alienware 13 R3 Intel Core i7-7700HQ ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | 2.5 kg | 22 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1440 | glossy | ||
6 | 86.7 % v6 (old) | 11 / 2017 | Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
7 | 86.6 % v6 (old) | 10 / 2017 | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Intel Core i7-7700HQ ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, SSD | 3.1 kg | 22.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
8 | 87 % v6 (old) | 10 / 2017 | Guru Mars K Intel Core i7-7700 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD | 4.2 kg | 41 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
9 | 87 % v6 (old) | 08 / 2017 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 4.6 kg | 58 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | matte | ||
10 | 87.4 % v6 (old) | 03 / 2017 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Intel Core i7-7820HK ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 4.3 kg | 45 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | matte |
No single gaming laptop is perfect; the most portable devices might suffer from thermal issues, the most powerful often fall short when used away from the charger. The purpose here is to identify our picks for what we consider to be the best in each category, including our value recommendations.
Portability
We only have a couple of specific requirements to be eligible for most portable. First, the screen-size had to be 14-inches or less out of consideration for fitting into backpacks; second, they had to be under two kilograms, so that they wouldn’t be a burden during several-hour periods of transport.
Razer Blade 2017
Winner: The 14-inch Razer Blade 2017 (Score: 89%) takes the top spot here for its svelte dimensions (18 x 345 x 236 mm / 0.71 x 13.58 x 9.29 inches H x W x D) and weight (1.84 kg / 4.06 pounds). The inclusion of a full 45-watt i7-7700HQ and GTX 1060 is impressive when you consider that the internal dimensions are only 1.47 Liters. Unfortunately, there are problems with fitting components that produce this much heat into such a small chassis. While there was no thermal throttling detected during our gaming benchmarks, we did find that the Blade 2017 scored slightly lower than other models with the same graphics card — although we’re nit-picking with the difference only really being around 2-6%.
The cooling fans, which are thankfully idle during most office workloads, got to an obtrusive 51 dB during gaming — a comfortable pair of headphones is highly recommended. In the same testing period, the center of the keyboard climbed to around 44 C.
Price comparison
Aorus x3 Plus v7
Runner-up: The Aorus x3 Plus v7 (Score: 82%) gets second place here, despite the marginally smaller 13.9-inch screen and slightly lighter 1.80 kg (3.97 pounds) weight. We decided to put it in second place because of the larger body dimensions (22.9 x 327 x 263.5 mm / 0.9 x 12.87 x 10.37 inches H x W x D) caused by the cooling setup in the rear and a little extra thickness. The 1.97-liter body is still impressively compact for the performance parts that it contains and it only got relegated to second place because of small differences.
The Aorus x3 Plus v7 handled gaming with aplomb, posting good frame rates while also managing to keep the processor running at the overclocked speeds. In a stress test scenario, the clock speeds for both CPU and GPU dropped (but not as significantly as the Razer Blade). The main weakness of the X3 became apparent to us during our gaming testing and stress testing — in both scenarios the fans hit a whopping 53.6 dB.
Price comparison
Gigabyte Aero 14 2017 and MSI GS63VR 7RF
Special mentions: The Gigabyte Aero 14 2017 (Score: 86%) very nearly made it onto this list as the runner up with dimensions of 20 x 335 x 250 mm (0.79 x 13.19 x 9.84 inches) H x W x D resulting in a volume of 1.65 liters. However, since we put a greater emphasis on weight, it was relegated out of the top two spots due to its slightly heavier 1.88 kg heft. The MSI GS63VR 7RF (Score: 84%) also gets a mention as the only 15.6” notebook with a GTX 1060 to come in under 2 kg, with a weight of 1.9 kg.
Display
Displays are an often-overlooked aspect when choosing a gaming laptop. Keen gamers who intend to use the notebook’s screen rather than an external one will benefit from picking a higher quality panel. For this section, we used black-to-white response time as our key metric and utilized other measurements such as refresh rate to decide between similar displays.
Alienware 13 R3
Winner: The Alienware 13 R3 (Score: 88%) can be configured with a beautiful 13.3-inch 1440p OLED display that is stunning to look at. When deciding between TN or IPS panels on gaming laptops, there are positives and negatives for each that must be considered, but the newer OLED technology is better suited for gaming with their fast response and punchy colors. Those who like fast-paced games will drool over the 2.8 ms (1.2 ms rise, 1.6 ms fall) black-to-white response time, which makes pixel ghosting a thing of the past.
The 310-nit brightness is decent and is enough to overcome the glossy surface on the screen when indoors, but it struggles outdoors. This screen produced rich, pleasing colors with true inky blacks and an sRGB rating of 97% and AdobeRGB of 78%. The only real downside of this OLED screen is the presence of PWM at 240 Hz through all brightness levels, which is low enough that those who are sensitive to PWM flicker are likely to be affected. This flickering is similar to competing laptops such as the Razer Blade 2017 and Aorus X3 Plus V7, but those two don’t have the lightning fast response time to redeem themselves.
Price comparison
MSI GT75VR 7RF Titan Pro
Runner-up: The MSI GT75VR 7RF Titan Pro (Score 87%) is a hulking beast of a notebook that is equipped with a 17.3-inch 1080p 120 Hz TN panel with G-Sync support. The black-to-white response time of 6.8 ms isn’t actually the second fastest after the Alienware 13, but it is close. Additionally, the grey-to-grey time of 11.6 ms is suitably low, and together these two figures combine to make it difficult to detect any slow-to-change pixels. The inbuilt support for Nvidia’s G-Sync technology will help reduce visual tearing as the framerate fluctuates, and this 120 Hz display will also provide smooth movement in fast-paced scenes.
The screen is surprisingly color accurate for a TN panel, with a low black level, excellent DeltaE of 0.64 for grey and 1.36 for colors, and sRGB/AdobeRGB ratings of 100%/77% that bests many IPS panels. PWM is present at brightness levels below 15%, but at 25000 Hz the rate of flickering is high enough that only the most sensitive will notice any side effects. Those who are affected should just keep the screen brightness above 15%, something which should be reasonably easy given the disappointing 262-nit maximum brightness.
Price comparison
Alienware 13 R3 JJT6C_133KL05 (SDCA029), OLED, 13.3", 2560x1440 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Aorus X9 AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440 | SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 ID: AUO52ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN05.2, , 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | |||||
Display P3 Coverage | 90.3 | 60.6 | 66.4 | 65.9 | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 84 | 89.2 | 87.8 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.8 | 61.1 | 65.3 | 64.2 | |
Response Times | |||||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.6 ? | 21.6 ? | 26 ? | 20.8 ? | |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.8 ? | 6.8 ? | 6.6 ? | 7 ? | 8.8 ? |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 25000 ? | |||
Screen | |||||
Brightness middle | 313 | 274 | 346 | 384 | 416.2 |
Brightness | 310 | 262 | 326 | 372 | 409 |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 | 88 | 88 | 94 |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.86 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.54 | 1.36 | 5.98 | 9.89 | 8.4 |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.94 | 4.1 | 9.77 | 14.56 | 15.4 |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.43 | 0.64 | 5.47 | 10.41 | 11.2 |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.02 109% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6337 103% | 6551 99% | 7721 84% | 9919 66% | 10036 65% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 78 | 77 | 55 | 58 | 57.2 |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 100 | 84 | 89 | 87.3 |
Contrast | 1054 | 641 | 573 | 484 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
Graphics cards are the most critical component for providing visual fidelity, and while a single GPU is easily enough for most gamers — and most games — those who want the absolute maximum performance in supported titles, or smooth 4K gaming, will need to consider dual-GPU configurations. We based these results on 3D Mark’s Fire Strike combined score because it represents typical gaming scenarios, including the impact of CPU on physics calculation.
MSI GT83VR 7RF Titan SLI
Winner: The MSI GT83VR 7RF Titan SLI (Score: 84%) squeaks slightly ahead of its closest competitor with a massive Fire Strike score of 22192. It achieves this score with two Pascal based GTX 1080s in SLI configuration, which posts results 75 - 90% higher than competitors with a single GTX 1080. Unfortunately, gaming performance doesn’t scale as well as synthetic benchmarks. Some supported titles, such as The Witcher 3, scored 35% (1080p) to 43% (4k) better than the single card Schenker XMG U727 2017, while other games provide near identical performance between the two models e.g., Resident Evil 7. When adding external displays into the equation, nearly every game we tested showed a significant improvement in frame rates at 4K.
While this section is all about the graphics cards, it is worth noting that the processor is a slight weakness in the GT83VR. The i7-7920HQ is one of the fastest mobile chips available right now, but it comes up short by up to 10 – 13% in CPU benchmarks when compared against overclockable HK-series mobile processors.
Price comparison
Asus GX800VH
Runner-up: The Asus GX800VH makes its way onto the list via a technicality. Back in 2016, Asus provided us with a prototype of the Skylake version for testing, but as a pre-release unit, we didn't perform a full review or assign a score. Being tested more than a year ago, and running an older Skylake CPU would also have put it outside the criteria of this guide.
However, in late 2017 this water-cooled behemoth and its dual GTX 1080 SLI setup is still the second fastest notebook we’ve ever run through Fire Strike with a score of 22020 points. Since the graphics card configuration is identical to the GT83VR above, the same comments regarding gaming abilities apply here, except that the GX800VH comes with a 4K G-Sync display from the factory. Asus now has a Kaby Lake version with an overclocking-capable i7-7820HK, creating an incredibly potent gaming machine that could post an even higher score than the prototype we tested.
Price comparison
Asus ROG G701VIK and Acer Predator 17 X
Special Mentions: Multi-GPU notebooks are a niche product, and the vast majority of shoppers are likely to end up buying something with a single GPU. Our first special mention is the Asus ROG G701VIK (Score: 86%) with a GTX 1080 and combined Fire Strike score of 17700 — 5 – 10% above most similarly equipped competitors. Another plus is that Asus included a 120 Hz G-Sync display to take advantage of this horsepower. The other laptop we'd like to highlight is the Acer Predator 17 X (Score: 87%) and its Fire Strike score of 17463, which is less than 2% behind the G701. The display has a better-than-normal 75 Hz refresh rate and G-Sync to help reduce screen tearing.
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus GX800VH Prototype | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Aorus X9 | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
Guru Mars K | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Asus GX800VH Prototype | |
Aorus X9 | |
Guru Mars K | |
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL |
Battlefield 1 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
Aorus X9 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Aorus X9 | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 |
Resident Evil 7 | |
1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Aorus X9 | |
3840x2160 High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
Aorus X9 |
Dishonored 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Aorus X9 | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:TX | |
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI | |
Aorus X9 | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 |
Battery Life
Although we are assessing gaming laptops, we decided to base the rankings on our WiFi Surfing v1.3 test, since for most people it is more important how long they can practically use their notebook when unplugged rather than how long they can game away from a power socket.
Razer Blade 2017
Winner: The Razer Blade 2017 (Score: 89%) makes another appearance, and although it has a good-sized battery for the form factor at 70 Wh, it is still a lower capacity than similar sized models from Alienware and Gigabyte. However, it might be Razer’s power policy — which is among the more aggressive — which achieves the 9h 5min ‘WiFi Surfing v1.3’ battery life. This policy is most obvious when looking at ‘idle maximum’ and ‘load maximum’ power draw.
Price comparison
Gigabyte Aero 14 2017
Runner-up: The Gigabyte Aero 14 2017 (Score: 86%) is another relatively compact laptop with a large battery, showing the advantage of a small screen in sipping power more frugally. Despite having a more substantial 94 Wh battery compared to the Razer Blade 2017, Gigabyte’s power policy allows for the CPU and GPU to both draw more wattage under load. This battery results in a (still excellent) measurement of 8h 44min in ‘WiFi surfing v1.3.’
Price comparison
Best Value
Sometimes the budget won’t stretch to cover features such as high refresh rate displays or premium construction materials. In these cases, the ideal gaming laptop is the one which gives the best trade-off between price and performance. We believe this is currently GTX 1060 (and Max-Q) equipped models around the US$1000-1100 range. Price eligibility was confirmed using Amazon US, but regional (and holiday) pricing may vary.
Acer Predator Helios 300
Winner: The Acer Predator Helios 300 (Score: 82%) is a great value orientated choice for those on a budget. The Intel i7-7700HQ has enough power to handle gaming tasks, and performance is in line with other i7-7700HQ models with Cinebench R15 scores of 159 (single) and 735 (multi). This GTX 1060 performs on the higher end of the scale with a Fire Strike Graphics score of 12009, with the gaming benchmarks showing that most games can be handled at the 17-inch screen’s native 1080p resolution on ultra-settings.
To reduce the price some shortcuts were taken. Our test unit has noticeable light bleed and clouding around the corners, and the color reproduction is just ‘ok’ (86% sRGB). The speakers were underwhelming, the sound was flat, and the noisy cooling fans make a high-pitched sound as they speed up, although most people will use headphones or an external speaker setup when gaming at home. Finally, the 48 Wh battery is significantly smaller than the 70 – 99 Wh typically found in 17-inch laptops, which explains the comparatively short 4h 39min battery life in our WiFi v1.3 test.
Price comparison
Dell Inspiron 15 7577
Runner-up: The Dell Inspiron 15 7577 (Score: currently under review) is the GTX 1060 Max-Q upgrade to the popular GTX 1050 Ti equipped Inspiron 7567. Retail prices are similar to the Helios 300, but our test model is rocking the slower i5-7300HQ (131 / 514, Single / Multi-core in Cinebench R15), fortunately for gamers the i5 compared to the i7 doesn’t result in as large of a difference in gaming as it does in CPU heavy workloads.
Where we do see a more substantial performance gap is with the use of the more power-efficient Max-Q variant of the GTX 1060, but we are still only talking about a difference of around 8 – 14% lower than several different GTX 1060 based laptops in Fire Strike Graphics benchmark (10263). The Inspiron 15 7577 was still able to play our test games on 1080p Ultra between 45 – 98 fps.
Our review is still in progress, so it is too early to talk about many aspects of this laptop. However, our measurements found that the screen brightness is low with a maximum of just 223 nits, and the color reproduction is among the least accurate with 55% sRGB.