Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i7-13700K

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-14501E

► remove from comparison Intel Core i5-14501E

The Intel Core i5-14501E is a peculiar Raptor Lake family desktop processor (SoC) that has 6 performance cores but 0 efficient cores. It's the lack of E-cores that makes 14X01 chips special.

The product has decently sized level 2 and 3 caches at 12 MB and 24 MB, respectively. Its CPU cores run at up to 5.2 GHz. The UHD 770 serves as the integrated graphics solution. There is no 'proper' NPU here, however, vPro Enterprise features such as RPE (Remote Platform Erase) are onboard.

The i5 chip is manufactured built with the Intel 7 process which is fairly old, as of mid 2025. Its base TDP sits at 65 W which is the standard value for desktop CPUs.

Performance

While we have not tested a single 14X01 processor as of July 2025, we do know that a single 4.6 GHz Raptor Cove core, such as that of an Core i7-14650HX is good for 116 Cinebench 2024 points and 285 Cinebench R15 points. (The 14501E can run at up to 5.2 GHz, too, to remind you.) If we multiply the values by 6, we get a reasonably fair projection that sees the 14501E being about as fast as lower mid-range laptop AMD chips of 2025, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. While not particularly impressive, this is definitely sufficient for any tasks and applications one could run in 2025, top games included.

Intel Core i7-13700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700K

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end CPU based on the current Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in September 2022. The base clock is 3.4 GHz and can reach up to 5.4 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 16 cores are divided into 8 P-cores and 8 E-cores, which we already know from the Alder Lake architecture. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, however, the number of E-cores has been doubled, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700K now offers 24 threads. As usual, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. In addition, all new Raptor Lake processors can be operated on the existing Socket 1700 motherboards.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Core i7-13700K still offers 8 P-cores, but these are to be relieved by 8 additional E-cores for demanding applications. The E-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Compared to Alder Lake, the number of e-cores has been doubled, which significantly improves multi-thread performance in combination with a further increase in IPC. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 can increase the clock rate of the P-cores to up to 5.4 GHz. The E-cores can also be overclocked and reach a maximum of 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Intel Core i7-13700K offers an integrated graphics unit (iGPU). The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power Consumption

The Intel Core i7-13700K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires good cooling. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value is not restricted by a Tau value.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7940HSIntel Core i5-14501EIntel Core i7-13700K
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Raptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)Intel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E « 3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K « 3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5200 MHz3400 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB24 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP35 Watt65 Watt125 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8LGA1700LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, DL Boost, GNA, vPro En., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.intel.comwww.intel.de
$409 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
40.8 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700K
46.1 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.9     avg: 106     median: 107 (60%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 919     median: 935 (17%)     max: 972 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16801     median: 16907 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
min: 30737     avg: 30745     median: 30745 (29%)     max: 30753 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1784     median: 1789 (75%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 2114     avg: 2116     median: 2116 (89%)     max: 2118 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 679     avg: 699     median: 702 (76%)     max: 714 Points
min: 808     avg: 812     median: 811.5 (88%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6575     median: 6571 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 11685     avg: 11714     median: 11713.5 (29%)     max: 11742 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2665     median: 2659 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 4438     avg: 4508     median: 4507.5 (28%)     max: 4577 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 281.1     median: 283 (78%)     max: 288 Points
303 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.4     median: 30.5 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
53 Points (69%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (80%)     max: 3.46 Points
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7866     median: 7837 (47%)     max: 7963 Points
11278 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48859     median: 48751 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
85748 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86849     median: 87296 (56%)     max: 88529 Points
135499 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14232     avg: 14421     median: 14300 (17%)     max: 14731 Points
17002 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 87.3     median: 97 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
170.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.699 s
2.3 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7503     median: 7490 (12%)     max: 7580 Points
12835 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70800     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 110420     avg: 111390     median: 111390 (64%)     max: 112359 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6310     avg: 6614     median: 6642 (78%)     max: 6776 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7062     median: 7061.5 (83%)     max: 7062 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.3     median: 144.2 (48%)     max: 150.8 fps
232 fps (78%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 288     avg: 295     median: 292.5 (67%)     max: 304.5 fps
406 fps (94%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 33.7     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (59%)     max: 34 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (41%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (65%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
4 GB/s (69%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15.1 (39%)     max: 15.2 GB/s
15.8 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 308.2     median: 311 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
min: 174     avg: 176.5     median: 176.5 (2%)     max: 179 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 191.7     median: 192 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
min: 106     avg: 108     median: 108 (1%)     max: 110 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
min: 0.3855     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3899 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15630     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 16149 Points
18153 Points (39%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
13.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 572     median: 532.8 (2%)     max: 653.976 s
317.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 81139     median: 81099.5 (62%)     max: 86583 Points
85363 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22356     median: 22390.5 (55%)     max: 25006 Points
31214 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88924     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
99898 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88753     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
99878 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91061     median: 91304.5 (76%)     max: 96047 Points
103719 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19825     median: 20578 (52%)     max: 21353 Points
28204 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28122     median: 28061 (50%)     max: 30876 Points
45127 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11192     median: 11196 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
18897 Points (80%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2408     avg: 2615     median: 2661.5 (66%)     max: 2746 Points
2962 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9798     avg: 12181     median: 12348 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
19249 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2413     avg: 2555     median: 2592.5 (82%)     max: 2646 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 12089     median: 12403 (51%)     max: 13086 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1983     median: 1989.5 (78%)     max: 2032 Points
min: 2081     avg: 2110     median: 2110 (82%)     max: 2139 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11931     median: 12145 (22%)     max: 12500 Points
min: 19719     avg: 20191     median: 20190.5 (36%)     max: 20662 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1880     median: 1905 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
2064 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11682     median: 11526 (36%)     max: 12141 Points
19217 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7923     median: 8014.5 (80%)     max: 8253 Points
8955 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 47560     median: 47496.5 (47%)     max: 49341 Points
69210 Points (69%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 498.9     median: 503 (1%)     max: 515 ms
min: 444     avg: 445.7     median: 444 (1%)     max: 449 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 262.5     median: 264 (73%)     max: 274 Points
301 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 322.4     median: 318 (57%)     max: 349 Points
348 Points (62%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1785     median: 1792 (67%)     max: 1861 Points
2325 Points (87%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 99.2     median: 94 (16%)     max: 130.1 Watt
357 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 101.1     median: 104.7 (19%)     max: 134 Watt
357 Watt (65%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.76     avg: 11.9     median: 10.7 (7%)     max: 20.1 Watt
83.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 28     median: 27.4 (20%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700K → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 04. 20:17:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18709 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14998 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754331422s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:06:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.023s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18709 +0.001s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 18709 +0s ... 0.037s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14998 +0.004s ... 0.04s

#13 got single benchmarks 14998 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.075s ... 0.12s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)